Suppr超能文献

图片在改善患者教育效果方面的有效性:系统评价。

Effectiveness of pictographs in improving patient education outcomes: a systematic review.

机构信息

Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Res. 2021 Mar 23;36(1):9-40. doi: 10.1093/her/cyaa046.

Abstract

The objective of this review was to investigate process of pictograph development and the effectiveness of pictographs in patient education. We conducted searches in Medline/PubMed, CINAHL with full text, PsycInfo, ERIC and Cochrane Library with keywords: (pictograph or pictorial) AND (patient education) NOT (children or adolescent or youth or child or teenagers). After excluding manuscripts that did not meet inclusion criteria, 56 articles were included between the time of the last review on this topic (January 2008) and May 2019. There are 17 descriptive studies, 27 randomized control trial studies, 9 quasi-experimental studies and 2 unique literatures in the systematic review. Major goals of the studies are pictograph development or validation. The majority of manuscripts (n = 48) supported the approach. However, six studies did not find significant differences in the outcome. Differences in patient population, pictograph designs and author-developed outcome measurements made it difficult to compare the findings. There is a lack of evidence on validating information outcome measurements. This review demonstrated that implementing pictographs into patient education is a promising approach for better information understanding and health management. Pictographic interventions need to be carefully developed and validated with both the targeted patient population and the clinical experts.

摘要

本次综述的目的在于调查象形图的发展过程以及其在患者教育中的效果。我们在 Medline/PubMed、CINAHL with full text、PsycInfo、ERIC 和 Cochrane Library 中使用关键词进行了检索:(象形图或图画)AND(患者教育)NOT(儿童或青少年或青年或儿童或青少年)。排除了不符合纳入标准的文献后,自上次关于该主题的综述(2008 年 1 月)以来至 2019 年 5 月,共有 56 篇文章被纳入系统综述。其中有 17 项描述性研究、27 项随机对照试验研究、9 项准实验研究和 2 项独特的文献。研究的主要目标是象形图的开发或验证。大多数文献(n=48)支持这种方法。然而,有 6 项研究并未发现结果存在显著差异。由于患者人群、象形图设计和作者开发的结果测量存在差异,使得研究结果难以进行比较。关于验证信息结果测量的证据不足。本综述表明,在患者教育中引入象形图是一种很有前景的方法,可以更好地理解信息并进行健康管理。象形图干预措施需要精心开发,并针对目标患者人群和临床专家进行验证。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验