Suppr超能文献

为低识字水平的门诊患者绘制用药说明象形图的研发。

Development of pictographs depicting medication use instructions for low-literacy medical clinic ambulatory patients.

作者信息

Chuang Mei-Hua, Lin Chin-Lon, Wang Yuh-Feng, Cham Thau-Ming

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Rd., Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Jun;16(5):337-45. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.5.337.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One approach to help elderly and low-literacy patients understand instructions for medication use is to use pictographs or pictorial diagrams. However, most of these pictographs are designed by medical professionals and may not be optimal for such patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare low-literacy patients with medical staff in dimensions of preference and comprehension of pictographs intended to illustrate medication use instructions for medical clinic ambulatory patients.

METHODS

Following 2 pilot tests, the first with small samples (5 pharmacists and 5 patients) and the second with 100 patients with low literacy, a survey of pictograph understanding and preference was conducted between May and October 2008. The survey used a third version of 3 sets of pictographs in 4 medication instruction categories for 250 low-literacy patients and 250 members of the medical staff in a teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. The 4 medication instruction categories were (a) route of administration for external use; (b) time of day for medication administration; (c) medication administration before, after, or with meals; and (d) administration quantity. The measure of preference was which pictograph in each subset best described the instruction, and the measure of comprehension was the percentage of participants who understood the meaning of the pictograph. Differences between the 2 groups in pictograph choice and comprehension were calculated using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

All patients were considered low literacy (never attended school or grade 6 education or less). The preference of pictographs was significantly different between patients and medical staff for each of the 12 sets of pictographs. Comprehension was significantly different between patients and medical staff for pictographs in the categories of medication administration time of day and medication administration associated with meals. For pictographs representing "at bedtime," "after meals," and "with meals," the percentage of patients who chose "do not understand" was significantly higher than the percentage of medical staff choosing this item. The 3 patient age groups were 60 years or younger (43.2%), aged 61 to 70 years (26.4%), and aged 71 years or older (30.4%). Preference was found to be significantly different among the 3 patient age groups in pictographs for medication administration time "before meals" (P = 0.002), "after meals" (P = 0.007), "with meals"(P = 0.037), and in the pictographs representing "half tablet" (P = 0.012) in the category of administration quantity. Comprehension was found to differ among the 3 patient age groups in pictographs representing "at bedtime" (P = 0.040), "before meal" (P = 0.022), "after meals" (P = 0.025), and "with meals" (P = 0.014) and for "one, two, or three tablets" (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Patients and medical staff had significant differences in preference for all categories of medical instruction pictographs and had significant differences in comprehension for the pictographs in the categories of medication administration time of day and medication administration associated with meals. Patients' preferences for and comprehension RESEARCH of the medical instruction pictographs were age-related. For successful development of a comprehensible prescription drug label, a diverse sample of patients should be consulted to ensure that the pictographs depicting medication use instructions are useful to all individuals, including those with low literacy.

摘要

背景

帮助老年患者和低文化水平患者理解用药说明的一种方法是使用象形图或示意图。然而,这些象形图大多是由医学专业人员设计的,可能对这类患者并非最佳选择。

目的

比较低文化水平患者与医务人员在对旨在说明门诊患者用药说明的象形图的偏好和理解方面的差异。

方法

在进行了两次预试验后,第一次是小样本试验(5名药剂师和5名患者),第二次是对100名低文化水平患者进行试验,于2008年5月至10月对象形图的理解和偏好进行了调查。该调查使用了第三版的3组象形图,涉及4类用药说明,调查对象为台湾南部一家教学医院的250名低文化水平患者和250名医务人员。这4类用药说明分别是:(a)外用给药途径;(b)用药时间;(c)饭前、饭后或与餐同服;(d)给药剂量。偏好的衡量标准是每个子集中哪个象形图最能描述说明,理解的衡量标准是理解象形图含义的参与者的百分比。使用Fisher精确检验计算两组在象形图选择和理解方面的差异。

结果

所有患者均被视为低文化水平(从未上学或接受过六年级及以下教育)。在12组象形图中,患者和医务人员对象形图的偏好均存在显著差异。在用药时间和与餐相关的用药象形图方面,患者和医务人员的理解存在显著差异。对于表示“睡前”“饭后”和“与餐同服”的象形图,选择“不理解”的患者百分比显著高于选择该选项的医务人员百分比。3个患者年龄组分别为60岁及以下(43.2%)、61至70岁(26.4%)和71岁及以上(30.4%)。在用药时间“饭前”(P = 0.002)、“饭后”(P = 0.007)、“与餐同服”(P = 0.037)的象形图以及给药剂量类别中表示“半片”(P = 0.012)的象形图方面,发现3个患者年龄组的偏好存在显著差异。在表示“睡前”(P = 0.040)、“饭前”(P = 0.022)、“饭后”(P = 0.025)、“与餐同服”(P = 0.014)以及“一、二或三片”(P = 0.041)的象形图方面,发现3个患者年龄组的理解存在差异。

结论

患者和医务人员在各类医学说明象形图的偏好上存在显著差异,在用药时间和与餐相关的用药象形图的理解上也存在显著差异。患者对医学说明象形图的偏好和理解与年龄相关。为成功开发易懂的处方药标签,应咨询不同样本的患者,以确保描绘用药说明的象形图对所有个体(包括低文化水平者)都有用。

相似文献

7
Improving patient understanding of prescription drug label instructions.提高患者对处方药标签说明的理解。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jan;24(1):57-62. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0833-4. Epub 2008 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

3
Recall of Pharmaceutical Pictograms by Older Adults.老年人对药品象形图的记忆
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Nov-Dec;72(6):446-454. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验