• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为低识字水平的门诊患者绘制用药说明象形图的研发。

Development of pictographs depicting medication use instructions for low-literacy medical clinic ambulatory patients.

作者信息

Chuang Mei-Hua, Lin Chin-Lon, Wang Yuh-Feng, Cham Thau-Ming

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100 Shih-Chuan 1st Rd., Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Jun;16(5):337-45. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.5.337.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.5.337
PMID:20518586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10437966/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

One approach to help elderly and low-literacy patients understand instructions for medication use is to use pictographs or pictorial diagrams. However, most of these pictographs are designed by medical professionals and may not be optimal for such patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare low-literacy patients with medical staff in dimensions of preference and comprehension of pictographs intended to illustrate medication use instructions for medical clinic ambulatory patients.

METHODS

Following 2 pilot tests, the first with small samples (5 pharmacists and 5 patients) and the second with 100 patients with low literacy, a survey of pictograph understanding and preference was conducted between May and October 2008. The survey used a third version of 3 sets of pictographs in 4 medication instruction categories for 250 low-literacy patients and 250 members of the medical staff in a teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. The 4 medication instruction categories were (a) route of administration for external use; (b) time of day for medication administration; (c) medication administration before, after, or with meals; and (d) administration quantity. The measure of preference was which pictograph in each subset best described the instruction, and the measure of comprehension was the percentage of participants who understood the meaning of the pictograph. Differences between the 2 groups in pictograph choice and comprehension were calculated using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

All patients were considered low literacy (never attended school or grade 6 education or less). The preference of pictographs was significantly different between patients and medical staff for each of the 12 sets of pictographs. Comprehension was significantly different between patients and medical staff for pictographs in the categories of medication administration time of day and medication administration associated with meals. For pictographs representing "at bedtime," "after meals," and "with meals," the percentage of patients who chose "do not understand" was significantly higher than the percentage of medical staff choosing this item. The 3 patient age groups were 60 years or younger (43.2%), aged 61 to 70 years (26.4%), and aged 71 years or older (30.4%). Preference was found to be significantly different among the 3 patient age groups in pictographs for medication administration time "before meals" (P = 0.002), "after meals" (P = 0.007), "with meals"(P = 0.037), and in the pictographs representing "half tablet" (P = 0.012) in the category of administration quantity. Comprehension was found to differ among the 3 patient age groups in pictographs representing "at bedtime" (P = 0.040), "before meal" (P = 0.022), "after meals" (P = 0.025), and "with meals" (P = 0.014) and for "one, two, or three tablets" (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Patients and medical staff had significant differences in preference for all categories of medical instruction pictographs and had significant differences in comprehension for the pictographs in the categories of medication administration time of day and medication administration associated with meals. Patients' preferences for and comprehension RESEARCH of the medical instruction pictographs were age-related. For successful development of a comprehensible prescription drug label, a diverse sample of patients should be consulted to ensure that the pictographs depicting medication use instructions are useful to all individuals, including those with low literacy.

摘要

背景

帮助老年患者和低文化水平患者理解用药说明的一种方法是使用象形图或示意图。然而,这些象形图大多是由医学专业人员设计的,可能对这类患者并非最佳选择。

目的

比较低文化水平患者与医务人员在对旨在说明门诊患者用药说明的象形图的偏好和理解方面的差异。

方法

在进行了两次预试验后,第一次是小样本试验(5名药剂师和5名患者),第二次是对100名低文化水平患者进行试验,于2008年5月至10月对象形图的理解和偏好进行了调查。该调查使用了第三版的3组象形图,涉及4类用药说明,调查对象为台湾南部一家教学医院的250名低文化水平患者和250名医务人员。这4类用药说明分别是:(a)外用给药途径;(b)用药时间;(c)饭前、饭后或与餐同服;(d)给药剂量。偏好的衡量标准是每个子集中哪个象形图最能描述说明,理解的衡量标准是理解象形图含义的参与者的百分比。使用Fisher精确检验计算两组在象形图选择和理解方面的差异。

结果

所有患者均被视为低文化水平(从未上学或接受过六年级及以下教育)。在12组象形图中,患者和医务人员对象形图的偏好均存在显著差异。在用药时间和与餐相关的用药象形图方面,患者和医务人员的理解存在显著差异。对于表示“睡前”“饭后”和“与餐同服”的象形图,选择“不理解”的患者百分比显著高于选择该选项的医务人员百分比。3个患者年龄组分别为60岁及以下(43.2%)、61至70岁(26.4%)和71岁及以上(30.4%)。在用药时间“饭前”(P = 0.002)、“饭后”(P = 0.007)、“与餐同服”(P = 0.037)的象形图以及给药剂量类别中表示“半片”(P = 0.012)的象形图方面,发现3个患者年龄组的偏好存在显著差异。在表示“睡前”(P = 0.040)、“饭前”(P = 0.022)、“饭后”(P = 0.025)、“与餐同服”(P = 0.014)以及“一、二或三片”(P = 0.041)的象形图方面,发现3个患者年龄组的理解存在差异。

结论

患者和医务人员在各类医学说明象形图的偏好上存在显著差异,在用药时间和与餐相关的用药象形图的理解上也存在显著差异。患者对医学说明象形图的偏好和理解与年龄相关。为成功开发易懂的处方药标签,应咨询不同样本的患者,以确保描绘用药说明的象形图对所有个体(包括低文化水平者)都有用。

相似文献

1
Development of pictographs depicting medication use instructions for low-literacy medical clinic ambulatory patients.为低识字水平的门诊患者绘制用药说明象形图的研发。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Jun;16(5):337-45. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.5.337.
2
Effect of Pictograph-Based Discharge Instructions on Older Adults' Comprehension and Recall: A Pilot Study.基于象形图的出院指导对老年人理解和记忆的影响:一项试点研究。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;9(2):66-71. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20150513-05. Epub 2015 May 28.
3
Evaluation of a pictograph enhancement system for patient instruction: a recall study.用于患者指导的象形图增强系统评估:一项回忆研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1026-31. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002330. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
4
Using pictographs to enhance recall of spoken medical instructions II.使用象形图提高对口头医学指示的记忆 二。
Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Jun;43(3):231-42. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00171-3.
5
Development and pilot test of pictograph-enhanced breast health-care instructions for community-residing immigrant women.针对居住在社区的移民妇女的象形图增强型乳房保健指南的开发与试点测试。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2012 Aug;18(4):373-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2012.02051.x.
6
What's in a label? An exploratory study of patient-centered drug instructions.标签里有什么?一项以患者为中心的药物说明书的探索性研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;68(5):777-82. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1169-2. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
7
Improving patient understanding of prescription drug label instructions.提高患者对处方药标签说明的理解。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jan;24(1):57-62. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0833-4. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
8
Assessment of pictographs developed through a participatory design process using an online survey tool.使用在线调查工具对通过参与式设计过程开发的象形图进行评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2009 Feb 24;11(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1129.
9
Does Animation Improve Comprehension of Risk Information in Patients with Low Health Literacy? A Randomized Trial.动画是否能提高低健康素养患者对风险信息的理解?一项随机试验。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):17-28. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19890296. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
10
Development and evaluation of pictograms on medication labels for patients with limited literacy skills in a culturally diverse multiethnic population.针对文化多元的多民族人群中识字能力有限的患者,开展药物标签象形图的开发与评估。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Sep-Oct;10(5):720-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.003. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of textual elements on the comprehensibility of drug label instructions (DLIs): A systematic review.文本元素对药品标签说明书(DLIs)理解度的影响:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 May 19;16(5):e0250238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250238. eCollection 2021.
2
Provision and Need for Medicine Information in Asia and Africa: A Scoping Review of the Literature.亚洲和非洲的医药信息提供与需求:文献范围综述。
Drug Saf. 2021 Apr;44(4):421-437. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01038-8. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Recall of Pharmaceutical Pictograms by Older Adults.老年人对药品象形图的记忆
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Nov-Dec;72(6):446-454. Epub 2019 Dec 1.
4
A narrative review on do's and don'ts in prescription label writing - lessons for pharmacists.关于处方标签书写注意事项的叙述性综述——给药剂师的经验教训
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2018 Jun 13;7:53-66. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S163968. eCollection 2018.
5
Exploring the perspectives of potential consumers and healthcare professionals on the readability of a package insert: a case study of an over-the-counter medicine.探索潜在消费者和医疗保健专业人员对药品说明书可读性的看法:以一种非处方药为例的案例研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 May;70(5):583-8. doi: 10.1007/s00228-014-1645-6. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
6
Factors affecting healthy eating and physical activity behaviors among multiethnic blue- and white-collar workers: a case study of one healthcare institution.多民族蓝领和白领工人健康饮食及身体活动行为的影响因素:以一家医疗机构为例的研究
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2013 Sep;72(9):300-6.
7
Development of a standardized knowledge base to generate individualized medication plans automatically with drug administration recommendations.开发一个标准化知识库,以便根据药物管理建议自动生成个体化用药计划。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;76 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):37-46. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12188.
8
Legibility of USP pictograms by clients of community pharmacies in Portugal.葡萄牙社区药剂师客户对 USP 图形的易读性。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Feb;35(1):22-9. doi: 10.1007/s11096-012-9698-z. Epub 2012 Oct 14.
9
Patient communication tools to enhance ART adherence counseling in low and high resource settings.用于增强资源匮乏和资源丰富环境下抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)依从性咨询的患者沟通工具。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Oct;89(1):163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.020. Epub 2012 May 9.