Ranmal Rita, Prictor Megan, Scott J Tim
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 5-11 Theobalds Road, London, UK, WC1X 8SH.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;2008(4):CD002969. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002969.pub2.
Communication with children and adolescents with cancer about their disease and treatment and the implications of these is an important aspect of good quality care. It is often poorly performed in practice. Various interventions have been developed that aim to enhance communication involving children or adolescents with cancer.
To assess the effects of interventions for improving communication with children and/or adolescents about their cancer, its treatment and their implications, updating the 2003 version of this review.
In April 2006 we updated searches of the following sources: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, issue 1 2006); MEDLINE (Ovid), (2003 to March week 5 2006); EMBASE (Ovid) (2003 to 2006 week 13); PsycINFO (Ovid) (2003 to March week 5 2006); CINAHL (Ovid) (2003 to March week 5 2006); ERIC (CSA) (earliest to 2006); Sociological Abstracts (CSA) (earliest to 2006); Dissertation Abstracts: (2002 to 6 April 2006).In 2003 we conducted searches of CENTRAL; MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, Sociological Abstracts and Dissertation Abstracts.For the initial (2001) publication of this review we also searched the following databases: PsycLIT; Cancerlit; Sociofile; Health Management Information Consortium; ASSIA; LISA; PAIS; Information Science Abstracts; JICST; Pascal; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts; Mental Health Abstracts; AMED; MANTIS.We also searched the bibliographies of studies assessed for inclusion, and contacted experts in the field.
Randomised and non-randomised controlled trials, and before and after studies, evaluating the effects of interventions for improving communication with children and/or adolescents about their cancer, treatment and related issues.
Data relating to the interventions, populations and outcomes studied and the design and methodological quality of included studies were extracted by one review author and checked by another review author. We present a narrative summary of the results.
One new study met the criteria for inclusion; in total we have included ten studies involving 438 participants. Studies were diverse in terms of the interventions evaluated, study designs used, types of people who participated and the outcomes measured.One study of a computer-assisted education programme reported improvements in knowledge and understanding about blood counts and cancer symptoms. One study of a CD-ROM about leukaemia reported an improvement in children's feelings of control over their health. One study of art therapy as support for children during painful procedures reported an increase in positive, collaborative behaviour. Two out of two studies of school reintegration programs reported improvements in some aspects of psychosocial wellbeing (one in anxiety and one in depression), social wellbeing (two in social competence and one in social support) and behavioural problems; and one reported improvements in physical competence. One newly-identified study of a multifaceted interactive intervention reported a reduction in distress (as measured by heart rate) related to radiation therapy.Two studies of group therapy, one of planned play and story telling, and one of a self-care coping intervention, found no significant effects on the psychological or clinical outcomes measured.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to enhance communication involving children and adolescents with cancer have not been widely or rigorously assessed. The weak evidence that exists suggests that some children and adolescents with cancer may derive some benefit from specific information-giving programs, from support before and during particular procedures, and from interventions that aim to facilitate their reintegration into school and social activities. More research is needed to investigate the effects of these and other related interventions.
与患有癌症的儿童和青少年就其疾病、治疗及其影响进行沟通是优质护理的一个重要方面。在实际操作中,这一点往往做得很差。已经开发了各种干预措施,旨在加强与患有癌症的儿童或青少年的沟通。
评估旨在改善与儿童和/或青少年就其癌症、治疗及其影响进行沟通的干预措施的效果,更新本综述2003年版。
2006年4月,我们更新了对以下来源的检索:Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL,2006年第1期);医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE,Ovid平台)(2003年至2006年第5周);荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE,Ovid平台)(2003年至2006年第13周);心理学文摘数据库(PsycINFO,Ovid平台)(2003年至2006年第5周);护理学与健康照护数据库(CINAHL,Ovid平台)(2003年至2006年第5周);教育资源信息中心数据库(ERIC,CSA平台)(最早至2006年);社会学文摘数据库(Sociological Abstracts,CSA平台)(最早至2006年);学位论文文摘数据库(Dissertation Abstracts)(2002年至2006年4月6日)。2003年,我们检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、ERIC、Sociological Abstracts和Dissertation Abstracts。对于本综述的首次(2001年)发表,我们还检索了以下数据库:心理学文献数据库(PsycLIT);癌症文献数据库(Cancerlit);社会科学文献数据库(Sociofile);健康管理信息联盟数据库(Health Management Information Consortium);应用社会科学索引和摘要数据库(ASSIA);图书馆与信息科学文摘数据库(LISA);公共事务信息服务数据库(PAIS);信息科学文摘数据库(Information Science Abstracts);日本科技信息数据库(JICST);法国科研中心数据库(Pascal);语言学与语言行为文摘数据库(Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts);心理健康文摘数据库(Mental Health Abstracts);联合和补充医学数据库(AMED);医学文摘数据库(MANTIS)。我们还检索了纳入研究的参考文献,并联系了该领域的专家。
随机对照试验和非随机对照试验,以及前后对照研究,评估旨在改善与儿童和/或青少年就其癌症、治疗及相关问题进行沟通的干预措施的效果。
由一位综述作者提取与所研究的干预措施、人群和结局以及纳入研究的设计和方法学质量相关的数据,并由另一位综述作者进行核对。我们对结果进行了叙述性总结。
一项新研究符合纳入标准;我们总共纳入了10项研究,涉及438名参与者。这些研究在评估的干预措施、使用的研究设计、参与人群的类型以及测量的结局方面各不相同。一项关于计算机辅助教育项目的研究报告称,在关于血细胞计数和癌症症状的知识和理解方面有所改善。一项关于白血病的光盘的研究报告称,儿童对自身健康的控制感有所增强。一项关于艺术疗法作为在痛苦程序中对儿童支持的研究报告称,积极、合作行为有所增加。两项关于重返学校项目的研究中有两项报告称,在心理社会幸福感(一项在焦虑方面,一项在抑郁方面)、社会幸福感(两项在社交能力方面,一项在社会支持方面)和行为问题的某些方面有所改善;另一项报告称身体能力有所改善。一项新发现的关于多方面互动干预的研究报告称,与放射治疗相关的痛苦(通过心率测量)有所减少。两项关于团体治疗的研究、一项关于有计划的游戏和讲故事的研究以及一项关于自我护理应对干预的研究,在测量的心理或临床结局方面未发现显著效果。
旨在加强与患有癌症的儿童和青少年沟通的干预措施尚未得到广泛或严格的评估。现有的薄弱证据表明,一些患有癌症的儿童和青少年可能从特定的信息提供项目、特定程序之前和期间的支持以及旨在促进他们重返学校和社会活动的干预措施中获得一些益处。需要更多的研究来调查这些及其他相关干预措施的效果。