Suppr超能文献

脑转移 NSCLC 患者全脑放疗联合或不联合厄洛替尼治疗的多中心、开放标签、随机、对照 III 期试验。

Whole-brain radiotherapy with and without concurrent erlotinib in NSCLC with brain metastases: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial.

机构信息

Cancer Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Cancer Center, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Neuro Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;23(6):967-978. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa281.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Erlotinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) demonstrated a favorable objective response rate in a phase II single-arm trial of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. We assessed whether concurrent erlotinib with WBRT is safe and benefits patients in a phase III, randomized trial.

METHODS

NSCLC patients with two or more brain metastases were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to WBRT (n = 115) or WBRT combined with erlotinib arms (n = 109). The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and cognitive function (CF) was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients from 10 centers across China were randomized to treatments. Median follow-up was 11.2 months. Median iPFS for WBRT concurrent erlotinib was 11.2 months vs 9.2 months for WBRT-alone (P = .601). Median PFS and overall survival (OS) of combination group were 5.3 vs 4.0 months (P = .825) and 12.9 vs 10.0 months (P = .545), respectively, compared with WBRT-alone. In EGFR-mutant patients, iPFS (14.6 vs 12.8 months; P = .164), PFS (8.8 vs 6.4 months; P = .702), and OS (17.5 vs 16.9 months; P = .221) were not significantly improved in combination group over WBRT-alone. Moreover, there were no significant differences in patients experiencing MMSE score change between the treatments.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent erlotinib with WBRT didn't improve iPFS and excessive CF detriment either in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population or in EGFR-mutant patients compared with WBRT-alone, suggesting that while safe for patients already taking the drug, there is no justification for adding concurrent EGFR-TKI with WBRT for the treatment of brain metastases. Trial registration: Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT01887795.

摘要

背景

厄洛替尼联合全脑放疗(WBRT)在一项非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑转移患者的 II 期单臂试验中显示出良好的客观缓解率。我们评估了 NSCLC 伴脑转移患者中 WBRT 联合厄洛替尼的同步治疗是否安全且有益。

方法

纳入了 2 个或更多脑转移灶的 NSCLC 患者,并按 1:1 随机分配至 WBRT 组(n=115)或 WBRT 联合厄洛替尼组(n=109)。主要终点为颅内无进展生存期(iPFS),认知功能(CF)通过简易精神状态检查(MMSE)评估。

结果

来自中国 10 家中心的 224 例患者被随机分组。中位随访时间为 11.2 个月。WBRT 联合厄洛替尼组的中位 iPFS 为 11.2 个月,WBRT 组为 9.2 个月(P=0.601)。联合组的中位 PFS 和总生存期(OS)分别为 5.3 个月 vs 4.0 个月(P=0.825)和 12.9 个月 vs 10.0 个月(P=0.545),而 WBRT 组分别为 4.0 个月和 10.0 个月。在 EGFR 突变患者中,iPFS(14.6 个月 vs 12.8 个月;P=0.164)、PFS(8.8 个月 vs 6.4 个月;P=0.702)和 OS(17.5 个月 vs 16.9 个月;P=0.221)均无显著改善。此外,在 WBRT 联合厄洛替尼组和 WBRT 组中,MMSE 评分变化的患者之间也没有显著差异。

结论

与 WBRT 相比,WBRT 联合厄洛替尼并未改善意向治疗(ITT)人群或 EGFR 突变患者的 iPFS 或认知功能损害,提示虽然对已服用该药的患者安全,但无理由为治疗脑转移添加 WBRT 同步 EGFR-TKI。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01887795。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Metastatic brain tumors: from development to cutting-edge treatment.转移性脑肿瘤:从发展到前沿治疗
MedComm (2020). 2024 Dec 20;6(1):e70020. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70020. eCollection 2025 Jan.

本文引用的文献

2
Current approaches to the management of brain metastases.脑转移瘤的治疗方法。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 May;17(5):279-299. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0320-3. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
3
Cancer statistics, 2020.癌症统计数据,2020 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
8
Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases: Evolution or Revolution?全脑放疗治疗脑转移瘤:是演进还是革命?
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):483-491. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9589. Epub 2017 Dec 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验