He Zhi-Yong, Li Mei-Fang, Lin Jing-Hui, Lin Dong, Lin Ren-Jang
Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Translation Cancer Medicine, Fuzhou 350014, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China,
Cancer Manag Res. 2019 Mar 14;11:2129-2138. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S184922. eCollection 2019.
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a global public health problem, and brain is a common metastatic site in advanced NSCLC. Currently, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) remains a major treatment for brain metastases, while EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is the standard treatment for advanced NSCLC harboring mutations, which is also effective for brain metastases. However, whether EGFR-TKIs plus radiotherapy is superior to EGFR-TKIs alone for the treatment of advanced -mutant NSCLS with brain metastases remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of concurrent EGFR-TKIs and WBRT vs EGFR-TKI alone in a retrospective cohort of advanced -mutant NSCLS with brain metastases.
The medical records of 104 treatment-naïve, advanced -mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases were retrospectively reviewed, and there were 56 patients undergoing concurrent EGFR-TKI and WBRT, and 48 patients given EGFR-TKI alone, including 20 cases with salvage WBRT upon brain metastasis progression. The survival prognosis was compared between the two cohorts.
The baseline clinicopathologic factors were balanced between the two cohorts. After a median follow-up of 23 months, 35.6% of the study subjects survived. Concurrent EGFR-TKI and WBRT significantly improved the median intracranial PFS (iPFS) compared with EGFR-TKI alone (17.7 vs 11.0 months, =0.015); however, no significant difference was seen in median overall survival between the two cohorts (28.1 vs 24.0 months, =0.756). In addition, the median iPFS was found to significantly vary in the number of brain metastases (≤3 vs>3 metastases: 18.0 vs 12.5 months, =0.044). Subgroup analysis showed that concurrent EGFR-TKI and WBRT improved median iPFS compared with EGFR-TKI alone in patients with more than three brain metastases (=0.001); however, no significant difference was observed between the two regimens in patients with three or less brain metastases (=0.526).
Our data demonstrate that concurrent EGFR-TKI and WBRT achieves longer iPFS than EGFR-TKI alone in advanced -mutant NSCLC with brain metastases. In advanced -mutant NSCLC with three or less brain metastases, EGFR-TKI alone may be an option as a first-line therapy.
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,脑是晚期NSCLC常见的转移部位。目前,全脑放疗(WBRT)仍是脑转移瘤的主要治疗方法,而表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)是晚期携带EGFR突变NSCLC的标准治疗方法,对脑转移瘤也有效。然而,EGFR-TKIs联合放疗治疗伴有脑转移的晚期EGFR突变NSCLS是否优于单纯EGFR-TKIs仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较在伴有脑转移的晚期EGFR突变NSCLS回顾性队列中,EGFR-TKIs与WBRT同步治疗和单纯EGFR-TKI治疗的疗效。
回顾性分析104例未经治疗、伴有脑转移的晚期EGFR突变NSCLC患者的病历,其中56例患者接受EGFR-TKIs与WBRT同步治疗,48例患者单纯接受EGFR-TKI治疗,包括20例脑转移进展后接受挽救性WBRT的患者。比较两组患者的生存预后。
两组患者的基线临床病理因素均衡。中位随访23个月后,35.6%的研究对象存活。与单纯EGFR-TKI相比,EGFR-TKIs与WBRT同步治疗显著改善了中位颅内无进展生存期(iPFS)(17.7个月对11.0个月,P=0.015);然而,两组患者的中位总生存期无显著差异(28.1个月对24.0个月,P=0.756)。此外,发现脑转移瘤数量不同,中位iPFS有显著差异(≤3个转移灶对>3个转移灶:18.0个月对12.5个月,P=0.044)。亚组分析显示,与单纯EGFR-TKI相比,EGFR-TKIs与WBRT同步治疗可改善脑转移瘤超过3个的患者的中位iPFS(P=0.001);然而,在脑转移瘤为3个或更少的患者中,两种治疗方案之间未观察到显著差异(P=0.526)。
我们的数据表明,在伴有脑转移的晚期EGFR突变NSCLC中,EGFR-TKIs与WBRT同步治疗比单纯EGFR-TKI可实现更长的iPFS。在脑转移瘤为3个或更少的晚期EGFR突变NSCLC中,单纯EGFR-TKI可作为一线治疗选择。