Suppr超能文献

托珠单抗治疗新冠肺炎合并肺炎住院患者的疗效。

Tocilizumab in Patients Hospitalized with Covid-19 Pneumonia.

机构信息

From Elmhurst Hospital Center-Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital (C.S.), and Elmhurst Hospital Center-New York City Health and Hospitals (E.K.-L.) - both in New York; Genentech, South San Francisco (J.H., L.Y., W.G.R., B.K., B.A., J.F., S.V.M.), and Highland Hospital, Oakland (R.B.) - both in California; San Juan Oncology Associates, Farmington, NM (J.D.N); Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia (G.J.C.); Michael E. DeBakey Houston VA Medical Center, Houston (L.P.); Holy Cross Health, Silver Spring, MD (M.L.C.); Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans (J.G.-D.); Central Military Hospital, Lima, Peru (V.C.); Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa (M.M.-R); BR Trials-Clinical Research, São Paulo (F.L.M.); Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi (R.S.); and Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City (M.F.G.-L.).

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 7;384(1):20-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2030340. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pneumonia is often associated with hyperinflammation. Despite the disproportionate incidence of Covid-19 among underserved and racial and ethnic minority populations, the safety and efficacy of the anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab in patients from these populations who are hospitalized with Covid-19 pneumonia are unclear.

METHODS

We randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients hospitalized with Covid-19 pneumonia who were not receiving mechanical ventilation to receive standard care plus one or two doses of either tocilizumab (8 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously) or placebo. Site selection was focused on the inclusion of sites enrolling high-risk and minority populations. The primary outcome was mechanical ventilation or death by day 28.

RESULTS

A total of 389 patients underwent randomization, and the modified intention-to-treat population included 249 patients in the tocilizumab group and 128 patients in the placebo group; 56.0% were Hispanic or Latino, 14.9% were Black, 12.7% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 12.7% were non-Hispanic White, and 3.7% were of other or unknown race or ethnic group. The cumulative percentage of patients who had received mechanical ventilation or who had died by day 28 was 12.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 16.9) in the tocilizumab group and 19.3% (95% CI, 13.3 to 27.4) in the placebo group (hazard ratio for mechanical ventilation or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.97; P = 0.04 by the log-rank test). Clinical failure as assessed in a time-to-event analysis favored tocilizumab over placebo (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.93). Death from any cause by day 28 occurred in 10.4% of the patients in the tocilizumab group and 8.6% of those in the placebo group (weighted difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -5.2 to 7.8). In the safety population, serious adverse events occurred in 38 of 250 patients (15.2%) in the tocilizumab group and 25 of 127 patients (19.7%) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized patients with Covid-19 pneumonia who were not receiving mechanical ventilation, tocilizumab reduced the likelihood of progression to the composite outcome of mechanical ventilation or death, but it did not improve survival. No new safety signals were identified. (Funded by Genentech; EMPACTA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04372186.).

摘要

背景

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)肺炎常伴有过度炎症。尽管在服务不足和种族和少数民族人群中 COVID-19 的发病率不成比例,但在因 COVID-19 肺炎住院的这些人群中,抗白细胞介素-6 受体抗体托珠单抗的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。

方法

我们以 2:1 的比例随机分配因 COVID-19 肺炎未接受机械通气的住院患者接受标准治疗加一剂或两剂托珠单抗(8mg/kg 静脉注射)或安慰剂。选择地点的重点是纳入高风险和少数民族人群的地点。主要结局是第 28 天机械通气或死亡。

结果

共有 389 名患者接受了随机分组,改良意向治疗人群包括托珠单抗组 249 名患者和安慰剂组 128 名患者;56.0%为西班牙裔或拉丁裔,14.9%为黑人,12.7%为美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民,12.7%为非西班牙裔白人,3.7%为其他或未知种族或族裔群体。第 28 天接受机械通气或死亡的患者累计百分比在托珠单抗组为 12.0%(95%置信区间[CI],8.5 至 16.9),在安慰剂组为 19.3%(95%CI,13.3 至 27.4)(机械通气或死亡的风险比,0.56;95%CI,0.33 至 0.97;P=0.04 对数秩检验)。在时间事件分析中,临床失败有利于托珠单抗而非安慰剂(风险比,0.55;95%CI,0.33 至 0.93)。第 28 天因任何原因导致的死亡在托珠单抗组 10.4%的患者和安慰剂组 8.6%的患者中发生(加权差异,2.0 个百分点;95%CI,-5.2 至 7.8)。在安全性人群中,托珠单抗组 250 名患者中有 38 名(15.2%)和安慰剂组 127 名患者中有 25 名(19.7%)发生严重不良事件。

结论

在未接受机械通气的 COVID-19 肺炎住院患者中,托珠单抗降低了机械通气或死亡复合结局进展的可能性,但并未改善生存率。未发现新的安全信号。(由基因泰克资助;EMPACTA ClinicalTrials.gov 编号,NCT04372186。)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f416/7781101/c87b03604296/NEJMoa2030340_f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验