• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新的狼疮标准:批判性观点。

New lupus criteria: a critical view.

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, University Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, Mount Sinai Hospital.

出版信息

Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2021 Mar 1;33(2):205-210. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000771.

DOI:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000771
PMID:33332888
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the validation of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2019 classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

RECENT FINDINGS

Positive antinuclear antibodies, which constitute the obligatory entry criterion of the EULAR/ACR criteria, were found in the vast majority of SLE patients worldwide, with 97% (94-100%) of patients antinuclear antibodies positive in studies investigating EULAR/ACR criteria performance. Combined over the publications, EULAR/ACR criteria sensitivity was 92% (range 85-97%). Specificity varied more relevantly, with the publications published after the EULAR/ACR 2019 criteria showing 93% (83-98%) specificity. Of particular relevance is the good performance of the EULAR/ACR criteria seen in pediatric SLE as well as in early SLE.

SUMMARY

The new classification criteria have been investigated in an impressive number of cohorts worldwide, adding to the data from the EULAR/ACR criteria project cohort. It is critical to strictly keep to the attribution rule, that items are only counted if there is no more likely alternative explanation than SLE, the domain structure, where only the highest weighted item in a domain counts, and the limitation to highly specific tests for antibodies to double-stranded DNA.

摘要

目的综述

回顾 2019 年欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)/美国风湿病学会(ACR)系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)分类标准的验证。

最新发现

阳性抗核抗体构成 EULAR/ACR 标准的强制性纳入标准,在全球绝大多数 SLE 患者中均可发现,在研究 EULAR/ACR 标准性能的研究中,97%(94-100%)的患者抗核抗体阳性。综合所有出版物,EULAR/ACR 标准的敏感性为 92%(范围 85-97%)。特异性的变化更为显著,EULAR/ACR 2019 标准发布后的出版物显示特异性为 93%(83-98%)。特别值得注意的是,EULAR/ACR 标准在儿科 SLE 和早期 SLE 中的表现良好。

总结

新的分类标准已在全球范围内进行了大量队列研究,增加了 EULAR/ACR 标准项目队列的数据。严格遵守归属规则至关重要,即只有在没有比 SLE 更可能的替代解释的情况下,才能将项目计入,必须遵循域结构,即只有在域中权重最高的项目才被计入,并且只能使用针对双链 DNA 抗体的高度特异性检测。

相似文献

1
New lupus criteria: a critical view.新的狼疮标准:批判性观点。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2021 Mar 1;33(2):205-210. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000771.
2
European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria item performance.欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)/美国风湿病学会(ACR)SLE 分类标准项目表现。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Jun;80(6):775-781. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219373. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Assessing the EULAR/ACR classification criteria for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.评估系统性红斑狼疮患者的 EULAR/ACR 分类标准。
Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022 Feb;18(2):135-144. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2022.2033617. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
Evaluation of the European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology-2019 classification criteria in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: a single-center retrospective study.评估欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮分类标准:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;41(8):2483-2489. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06138-7. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
5
Comparison of systemic lupus international collaborating clinics 2012 classification criteria and European league against rheumatism/American college of rheumatology 2019 classification criteria for early detection of childhood onset systemic lupus erythematosus (multi-center study).比较系统性红斑狼疮国际协作组 2012 分类标准与欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年儿童发病系统性红斑狼疮早期检测分类标准(多中心研究)。
Lupus. 2024 May;33(6):629-637. doi: 10.1177/09612033241240830. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Rheumatology-1997, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics-2012, and the European League Against Rheumatism-2019 criteria for juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.美国风湿病学会 1997 年、系统性红斑狼疮国际协作组 2012 年和欧洲抗风湿病联盟 2019 年青少年系统性红斑狼疮诊断标准的诊断准确性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Autoimmun Rev. 2022 Sep;21(9):103144. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103144. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
New classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮的新分类标准。
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2020 Nov;32(6):590-596. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000740.
8
Diagnostic accuracy of the European League against rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology-2019 versus the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics-2012 versus the ACR-1997 classification criteria in adult systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.欧洲抗风湿病联盟/美国风湿病学会 2019 年与系统性红斑狼疮国际协作临床中心 2012 年和美国风湿病学会 1997 年分类标准对成人系统性红斑狼疮的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 12;13:1023451. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1023451. eCollection 2022.
9
The Performances of the ACR 1997, SLICC 2012, and EULAR/ACR 2019 Classification Criteria in Pediatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.ACR 1997、SLICC 2012 和 EULAR/ACR 2019 分类标准在儿童系统性红斑狼疮中的表现。
J Rheumatol. 2021 Jun;48(6):907-914. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200871. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
10
New Criteria for Lupus.狼疮的新诊断标准
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2020 May 13;22(6):18. doi: 10.1007/s11926-020-00896-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Philosophical and distinct SLE epitomes: dogmas in conflict with evidences and an intellectual dissonance between established pathophysiological models.哲学性且独特的系统性红斑狼疮缩影:与证据相冲突的教条以及既定病理生理模型之间的认知失调。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 24;16:1580664. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1580664. eCollection 2025.
2
SLE: a cognitive step forward-a synthesis of rethinking theories, causality, and ignored DNA structures.SLE:认知上的进步——重新思考理论、因果关系和被忽视的 DNA 结构的综合。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jun 4;15:1393814. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1393814. eCollection 2024.
3
The greatest contribution to medical science is the transformation from studying symptoms to studying their causes-the unrelenting legacy of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur-and a causality perspective to approach a definition of SLE.
对医学科学的最大贡献是从研究症状转向研究病因——罗伯特·科赫和路易斯·巴斯德的不懈遗产——以及一种因果关系的观点来接近 SLE 的定义。
Front Immunol. 2024 Feb 1;15:1346619. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1346619. eCollection 2024.
4
SLE classification criteria: Science-based icons or algorithmic distractions - an intellectually demanding dilemma.SLE 分类标准:基于科学的图标还是算法干扰 - 一个高智力要求的困境。
Front Immunol. 2022 Sep 28;13:1011591. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1011591. eCollection 2022.