Poulsen D L, Hansen H J, Langemark M, Olesen J, Bech P
Department of Psychiatry, Frederiksborg General Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Psychother Psychosom. 1987;48(1-4):60-2. doi: 10.1159/000288032.
In the present study of 253 patients with chronic pain syndrome we have made a multidimensional approach. All patients have been included in the study independent of coexisting states of anxiety or depression. We included criteria for diagnosis, duration, generability and intensity of pain, anxiety and depression, psychosocial stressors and social functioning. Using this system we have evaluated the antipain effectiveness of clomipramine and mianserin in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. By use of the Melancholia Scale 16 patients (6%) had a major depression, and by use of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, 72 patients (28%) had a generalized anxiety disorder. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the three treatments, when using a visual analogue scale (VAS 10 cm with cut-off score 2 cm) for severity of pains as outcome criteria or the results of VAS and Global Clinical Impression Scale using the criteria of reduction of 50% or more between the pretreatment and posttreatment scores. By use of all the assessments it is possible to make an improvement curve for each patient expressed by the area under the curve, and not even there we found a difference between the three treatments. Clomipramine and mianserin were significantly superior to placebo in the topographical pain subgroup with headache using area under the improvement curves as criteria (p less than 0.05). When the 60-item General Health Questionnaire was used to identify minor psychiatric morbidity 44% was found. We can use this as a measure of quality of life. Our results have indicated that placebo-controlled studies are still needed in this field of research.
在对253例慢性疼痛综合征患者的本研究中,我们采用了多维方法。所有患者均被纳入研究,无论其是否并存焦虑或抑郁状态。我们纳入了疼痛、焦虑和抑郁的诊断标准、持续时间、普遍性和强度、心理社会应激源及社会功能等标准。使用该系统,我们在一项双盲、安慰剂对照试验中评估了氯米帕明和米安色林的抗痛效果。使用忧郁量表,16例患者(6%)患有重度抑郁症;使用汉密尔顿焦虑量表,72例患者(28%)患有广泛性焦虑症。当使用视觉模拟量表(VAS,10厘米,临界值为2厘米)作为疼痛严重程度的结局标准,或使用VAS和整体临床印象量表,以治疗前和治疗后评分降低50%或更多为标准时,结果显示三种治疗方法之间无统计学显著差异。通过所有评估,可以为每位患者绘制以曲线下面积表示的改善曲线,即便如此我们也未发现三种治疗方法之间存在差异。以改善曲线下面积为标准,在以头痛为主的疼痛亚组中,氯米帕明和米安色林显著优于安慰剂(p小于0.05)。当使用60项一般健康问卷来识别轻度精神疾病时,发现患病率为44%。我们可以将此作为生活质量的一项指标。我们的结果表明,该研究领域仍需要安慰剂对照研究。