• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.动脉内输入函数对动态对比增强磁共振成像确定胶质瘤分级的影响。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;94(1119):20200699. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200699. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Quantitative Assessment of Tumor Cell Proliferation in Brain Gliomas with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.脑胶质瘤的动态对比增强 MRI 肿瘤细胞增殖的定量评估。
Acad Radiol. 2019 Sep;26(9):1215-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
3
Volume-based histogram analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for estimation of gliomas IDH1 mutation status.基于体素的动态对比增强 MRI 直方图分析用于评估胶质瘤 IDH1 突变状态。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Oct;131:109247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109247. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.动态对比增强和动态磁敏感对比灌注磁共振成像用于胶质瘤分级:使用热点和直方图分析对血管腔室和通透性参数的初步比较
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Jun;85(6):1147-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
5
Glioma grading capability: comparisons among parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and ADC value on DWI.基于动态对比增强 MRI 参数和 DWI 上 ADC 值的胶质瘤分级能力比较。
Korean J Radiol. 2013 May-Jun;14(3):487-92. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2013.14.3.487. Epub 2013 May 2.
6
Textural features of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI derived model-free and model-based parameter maps in glioma grading.基于模型和模型自由的动态对比增强 MRI 纹理特征参数图在胶质瘤分级中的应用。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr;47(4):1099-1111. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25835. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
7
Correlation of volume transfer coefficient Ktrans with histopathologic grades of gliomas.容积转移系数 Ktrans 与胶质瘤组织学分级的相关性。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Aug;36(2):355-63. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23675. Epub 2012 May 11.
8
The assessment of immature microvascular density in brain gliomas with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.利用动态对比增强磁共振成像评估脑胶质瘤中未成熟微血管密度
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Sep;84(9):1805-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.035. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
9
Diagnostic Values of DCE-MRI and DSC-MRI for Differentiation Between High-grade and Low-grade Gliomas: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis.DCE-MRI 和 DSC-MRI 对高级别和低级别胶质瘤鉴别诊断的价值:一项综合荟萃分析。
Acad Radiol. 2018 Mar;25(3):338-348. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
10
Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.动脉输入函数选择对脑动态对比增强磁共振成像中动力学参数的影响。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jul;40:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of tracer kinetic models in evaluation of gliomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging.使用动态对比增强成像评估神经胶质瘤的示踪剂动力学模型综述。
Front Oncol. 2024 Jun 14;14:1380793. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1380793. eCollection 2024.
2
The Value of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) in the Differentiation of Pseudoprogression and Recurrence of Intracranial Gliomas.动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)在颅内胶质瘤假性进展和复发鉴别中的价值。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul 22;2022:5680522. doi: 10.1155/2022/5680522. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting complexity of tumor removal and postoperative outcome in patients with high-grade gliomas.预测高级别胶质瘤患者肿瘤切除的复杂性及术后结果。
Neurosurg Rev. 2018 Jan;41(1):371-373. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0921-1. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
2
Modification of population based arterial input function to incorporate individual variation.基于人群的动脉输入函数的修正,以纳入个体差异。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Jan;45:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
3
Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Renal Tumors: Common Subtype Differentiation using Pharmacokinetics.动态对比增强磁共振成像在肾肿瘤中的应用:基于药代动力学的常见亚型鉴别。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 8;7(1):3117. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03376-7.
4
Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.动脉输入函数选择对脑动态对比增强磁共振成像中动力学参数的影响。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Jul;40:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
5
Improved hepatic arterial fraction estimation using cardiac output correction of arterial input functions for liver DCE MRI.使用肝脏动态对比增强磁共振成像动脉输入函数的心输出量校正来改进肝动脉分数估计。
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Feb 21;62(4):1533-1546. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa553c. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
6
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary.2016 年世界卫生组织中枢神经系统肿瘤分类:概述。
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. Epub 2016 May 9.
8
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI of High Grade Brain Gliomas Obtained with Arterial or Venous Waveform Input Function.采用动脉或静脉波形输入函数获得的高级别脑胶质瘤动态对比增强灌注磁共振成像
J Neuroimaging. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):124-9. doi: 10.1111/jon.12254. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
9
Glioma grading using apparent diffusion coefficient map: application of histogram analysis based on automatic segmentation.基于自动分割的直方图分析在利用表观扩散系数图进行胶质瘤分级中的应用
NMR Biomed. 2014 Sep;27(9):1046-52. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3153. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
10
Glioma: Application of histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to tumor grading.神经胶质瘤:T1加权动态对比增强磁共振成像药代动力学参数直方图分析在肿瘤分级中的应用
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jun;35(6):1103-10. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3825. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

动脉内输入函数对动态对比增强磁共振成像确定胶质瘤分级的影响。

Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xin Jiang Medical University, Urumqi, China.

School of Information Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;94(1119):20200699. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20200699. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20200699
PMID:33332981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8011249/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of artery input function (AIF) derived from different arteries for pharmacokinetic modeling on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameters in the grading of gliomas.

METHODS

49 patients with pathologically confirmed gliomas were recruited and underwent DCE-MRI. A modified Tofts model with different AIFs derived from anterior cerebral artery (ACA), ipsilateral and contralateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA) was used to estimate quantitative parameters such as K (volume transfer constant) and V (fractional extracellular-extravascular space volume) for distinguishing the low grade glioma from high grade glioma. The K and V were compared between different arteries using Two Related Samples Tests (TRST) ( Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test). In addition, these parameters were compared between the low and high grades as well as between the grade II and III using the Mann-Whitney U-test. A -value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS

All the patients completed the DCE-MRI successfully. Sharp wash-in and wash-out phases were observed in all AIFs derived from the different arteries. The quantitative parameters (K and V) calculated from PCA were significant higher than those from ACA and MCA for low and high grades, respectively ( < 0.05). Despite the differences of quantitative parameters derived from ACA, MCA and PCA, the K and V from any AIFs could distinguish between low and high grade, however, only K from any AIFs could distinguish grades II and III. There was no significant correlation between parameters and the distance from the artery, which the AIF was extracted, to the tumor.

CONCLUSION

Both quantitative parameters K and V calculated using any AIF of ACA, MCA, and PCA can be used for distinguishing the low- from high-grade gliomas, however, only K can distinguish grades II and III.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

We sought to assess the effect of AIF on DCE-MRI for determining grades of gliomas. Both quantitative parameters K and V calculated using any AIF of ACA, MCA, and PCA can be used for distinguishing the low- from high-grade gliomas.

摘要

目的

评估不同动脉源的动脉输入函数(AIF)在基于动态对比增强磁共振成像(DCE-MRI)的胶质瘤分级中对药代动力学模型参数的影响。

方法

共纳入 49 例经病理证实的脑胶质瘤患者,行 DCE-MRI 检查。使用改良的 Tofts 模型,以大脑前动脉(ACA)、患侧和对侧大脑中动脉(MCA)、大脑后动脉(PCA)的 AIF 分别计算定量参数,如 K(容积转移常数)和 V(细胞外-细胞外间隙容积分数),以区分低级别胶质瘤和高级别胶质瘤。采用两相关样本检验(TRST)(Wilcoxon 符号秩检验)比较不同动脉的 K 和 V 值。此外,采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较低级别和高级别、II 级和 III 级之间的这些参数。p 值小于 0.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

所有患者均成功完成 DCE-MRI 检查。所有不同动脉源的 AIF 均呈现明显的快速上升和快速下降期。PCA 计算的定量参数(K 和 V)在低级别和高级别胶质瘤中均显著高于 ACA 和 MCA(p 值均小于 0.05)。尽管 ACA、MCA 和 PCA 的 AIF 定量参数存在差异,但任何 AIF 的 K 和 V 都可以区分低级别和高级别胶质瘤,而只有任何 AIF 的 K 可以区分 II 级和 III 级。参数与 AIF 提取的动脉与肿瘤之间的距离之间无显著相关性。

结论

ACA、MCA 和 PCA 的任何动脉源的 AIF 计算的定量参数 K 和 V 都可用于区分低级别和高级别胶质瘤,但只有 K 可以区分 II 级和 III 级。

知识的进展

我们旨在评估 AIF 对 DCE-MRI 确定胶质瘤分级的影响。ACA、MCA 和 PCA 的任何动脉源的 AIF 计算的定量参数 K 和 V 都可用于区分低级别和高级别胶质瘤。