• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对风格如何调节抑郁、社交恐惧症和对照组中日常压力与社交互动之间的关系。

How Response Styles Moderate the Relationship between Daily Stress and Social Interactions in Depression, Social Phobia, and Controls.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Psychology and Intervention Science, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland,

Technische Universität Dresden, Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(4):280-284. doi: 10.1159/000511102. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1159/000511102
PMID:33333528
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Stress and social isolation are potent predictors of negative health outcomes and are impacted in mood and anxiety disorders. Difficulties in social interactions have been particularly noted in people diagnosed with major depression disorder (MDD) and social phobia (SP). It remains poorly understood, however, how these variables interact on a moment-to-moment basis and which variables moderate this relationship. Psychological flexibility, or the ability to be open to experiences while maintaining engagement in valued activities, may help moderate the relationship between stress and social interaction.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined these variables in participants diagnosed with MDD and SP and compared them to a control group.

METHODS

Participants were diagnosed with a mental disorder (n = 118 MDD; n = 47 SP) or were in the control group consisting of participants without MDD or SP (n = 119). Using the event sampling methodology (ESM), participants were queried six times per day for 7 days about stress, social interactions, and emotional response (rigid vs. flexible).

RESULTS

Higher current stress levels were related to more social interactions. This relationship was even stronger in situations when response flexibility was increased, especially in the clinical groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggest that a healthy psychological process (flexible emotional responding) buffers the relationship between stress and social interactions. We discuss how these variables interact and whether these patterns may paradoxically contribute to the maintenance of psychopathology.

摘要

简介

压力和社会隔离是负面健康结果的有力预测因素,会影响情绪和焦虑障碍。在被诊断患有重度抑郁症(MDD)和社交恐惧症(SP)的人群中,特别注意到了社交互动方面的困难。然而,这些变量如何在瞬息万变的基础上相互作用,以及哪些变量调节这种关系,仍知之甚少。心理灵活性,即在保持参与有价值的活动的同时对体验保持开放的能力,可能有助于调节压力与社交互动之间的关系。

目的

本研究在患有 MDD 和 SP 的参与者中检查了这些变量,并将其与对照组进行了比较。

方法

参与者被诊断患有精神障碍(n = 118 MDD;n = 47 SP)或属于无 MDD 或 SP 的对照组(n = 119)。使用事件抽样法(ESM),参与者在 7 天内每天被询问 6 次,内容有关压力、社交互动和情绪反应(僵化与灵活)。

结果

当前压力水平越高,社交互动就越多。在响应灵活性增加的情况下,这种关系更为强烈,尤其是在临床组中。

结论

数据表明,健康的心理过程(灵活的情绪反应)缓冲了压力与社交互动之间的关系。我们讨论了这些变量如何相互作用,以及这些模式是否可能矛盾地促成精神病理学的维持。

相似文献

1
How Response Styles Moderate the Relationship between Daily Stress and Social Interactions in Depression, Social Phobia, and Controls.应对风格如何调节抑郁、社交恐惧症和对照组中日常压力与社交互动之间的关系。
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(4):280-284. doi: 10.1159/000511102. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Daily fluctuation of emotions and memories thereof: Design and methods of an experience sampling study of major depression, social phobia, and controls.日常情绪波动及其记忆:重性抑郁障碍、社交恐惧症及对照组的经验取样研究的设计和方法。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;26(3). doi: 10.1002/mpr.1578.
3
Having versus not having social interactions in patients diagnosed with depression or social phobia and controls.患有抑郁症或社交恐惧症的患者与对照组患者之间是否存在社交互动。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249765. eCollection 2021.
4
Depersonalization and derealization in embarrassing social interactions: an experience sampling study in social phobia, major depression and controls.在尴尬的社交互动中出现的人格解体和现实解体:社交恐惧症、重度抑郁症和对照组的体验抽样研究。
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Mar;70:102189. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102189. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
5
General or specific? The memory-experience gap for individuals diagnosed with a major depressive disorder or a social phobia diagnosis, and individuals without such diagnoses.一般的还是特定的?患有重度抑郁症或社交恐惧症诊断的个体与没有此类诊断的个体之间的记忆体验差距。
Memory. 2019 Oct;27(9):1194-1203. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1640252. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
6
Differentiating emotions across contexts: comparing adults with and without social anxiety disorder using random, social interaction, and daily experience sampling.跨情境辨别情绪:使用随机、社交互动和日常经验采样比较有和无社交焦虑障碍的成年人。
Emotion. 2014 Jun;14(3):629-638. doi: 10.1037/a0035796. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
7
Is helping you helping me? The assessment of helping others using event sampling methodology in a clinical and a non-clinical sample.帮助你就是帮助我吗?在临床样本和非临床样本中使用事件抽样方法对帮助他人行为的评估。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Apr;62(2):768-781. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12593. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
8
Using Mobile Sensing to Test Clinical Models of Depression, Social Anxiety, State Affect, and Social Isolation Among College Students.利用移动传感技术测试大学生抑郁症、社交焦虑症、状态情感和社交隔离的临床模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 3;19(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6820.
9
The grass is always greener: Envy in social anxiety disorder.这草总是更绿:社交焦虑障碍中的嫉妒。
J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Aug;82:102445. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2021.102445. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
10
Well-being in major depression and social phobia with and without comorbidity.伴有或不伴有共病的重度抑郁症和社交恐惧症患者的幸福感。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018 Sep-Dec;18(3):201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Studying Daily Social Interaction Quantity and Quality in Relation to Depression Change: A Multi-Phase Experience Sampling Study.研究日常社交互动的数量和质量与抑郁变化的关系:一项多阶段经验抽样研究。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2025 Jul;51(7):1294-1309. doi: 10.1177/01461672231211469. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
To Help or Not to Help? Prosocial Behavior, Its Association With Well-Being, and Predictors of Prosocial Behavior During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic.帮还是不帮?亲社会行为、其与幸福感的关联以及新冠疫情期间亲社会行为的预测因素
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 11;12:775032. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775032. eCollection 2021.
3
Covariation of psychobiological stress regulation with valence and quantity of social interactions in everyday life: disentangling intra- and interindividual sources of variation.
日常生活中社会互动的效价和数量与心理生物应激调节的共变:解耦个体内和个体间的变异源。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2021 Sep;128(9):1381-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02359-3. Epub 2021 Jun 28.