Hao D J, Liu T J, He B R, Yang J S, Zou P, Zhang Z P, Liu P, Zhang X F, Huang D G, Chen H, Li Q D, Zhao Y T
Department of Spinal Surgery, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 8;100(45):3590-3595. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200715-02122.
To investigate the clinical outcomes and radiographic results of artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR) for cervical adjacent segment disease (ASD). The clinical data of 28 patients with single-segment cervical ASD treated with ACDR in Xi 'an Honghui Hospital from December 2013 to July 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 19 males and 9 females with a mean age of (46±7) years (36-63 years). Preoperative, postoperative 1 month and postoperative 24 months of clinical and radiographic outcomes were recorded and compared. The clinical outcome mainly includes Japanese orthopedic association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI%), Odom score and complications. Imaging assessment mainly included range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine, surgical segment ROM, Cobb angle of surgical segment, degree of adjacent disc degeneration, heterotopic ossification, and prosthesis related image parameters. In terms of clinical outcome, the average JOA score was 12.7±1.5 before surgery, 14.0±1.0 one month after surgery, 15.8±0.9 24 months after surgery, and the improvement rate of JOA was 75%±19%. The mean NDI% was 27.0%±2.8% before surgery, 20.5%±1.6% one month after surgery, and 15.3%±2.8% 24 months after surgery; the difference before and after treatment was statistically significant (159.101, 0.01). Twenty patients were classified with excellent Odom score and 8 patients with good Odom score at the final follow-up. The total ROM of cervical spine, operation segment ROM, operation segment Cobb angle were all improved significantly after the operation (4.633, 6.063, 26.952, all 0.05). There was a statistical difference in Miyazaki classification between adjacent discs above ACDR and below the fusion segment 24 months after surgery (μ(c)=2.12, 0.034). The incidence of heterotopic ossification was 14.3%. The results of displacement degree of prosthesis were as follow: coronal plane (0.30±0.11) mm, sagittal plane (0.28±0.10) mm; subsidence of the prosthesis: (0.27±0.09) mm. No prosthesis loosening was observed. The clinical outcome of revision of cervical ASD by ACDR is satisfactory. The risk of intervertebral disc degeneration in adjacent segments is significantly lower than that of ACDF due to the presence of certain motor function postoperatively.
探讨人工颈椎间盘置换术(ACDR)治疗颈椎相邻节段疾病(ASD)的临床疗效及影像学结果。回顾性分析2013年12月至2016年7月在西安红会医院接受ACDR治疗的28例单节段颈椎ASD患者的临床资料。其中男性19例,女性9例,平均年龄(46±7)岁(36 - 63岁)。记录并比较术前、术后1个月及术后24个月的临床和影像学结果。临床疗效主要包括日本骨科学会(JOA)评分、颈部功能障碍指数(NDI%)、奥多姆评分及并发症。影像学评估主要包括颈椎活动度(ROM)、手术节段ROM、手术节段Cobb角、相邻椎间盘退变程度、异位骨化及假体相关影像参数。在临床疗效方面,术前平均JOA评分为12.7±1.5,术后1个月为14.0±1.0,术后24个月为15.8±0.9,JOA改善率为75%±19%。术前平均NDI%为27.0%±2.8%,术后1个月为20.5%±1.6%,术后24个月为15.3%±2.8%;治疗前后差异有统计学意义(159.101,0.01)。末次随访时,奥多姆评分优20例,良8例。术后颈椎总ROM、手术节段ROM、手术节段Cobb角均显著改善(4.633,6.063,26.952,均P<0.05)。术后24个月,ACDR上方与融合节段下方相邻椎间盘的宫崎分类有统计学差异(μ(c)=2.12,P=0.034)。异位骨化发生率为14.3%。假体移位程度结果如下:冠状面(0.30±0.11)mm,矢状面(0.28±0.10)mm;假体下沉:(0.27±0.09)mm。未观察到假体松动。ACDR翻修治疗颈椎ASD的临床疗效满意。由于术后保留一定运动功能,相邻节段椎间盘退变风险显著低于前路颈椎融合术(ACDF)。