Carr Matthew J, Steeg Sarah, Mok Pearl L H, Pedersen Carsten Bøcker, Antonsen Sussie, Kapur Nav, Webb Roger T
NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Division of Pharmacy & Optometry, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;17(24):9409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249409.
The etiology of "dual harm" (the co-occurrence of self-harm and externalized violence in the same individual) is under-researched. Risk factors have mostly been investigated for each behavior separately. We aimed to examine adversities experienced between birth and age 15 years among adolescents and young adults with histories of self-harm and violent criminality, with a specific focus on dual harm. Three nested case-control studies were delineated using national interlinked Danish registers; 58,409 cases in total aged 15-35 were identified: 28,956 with a history of violent criminality (but not self-harm), 25,826 with a history of self-harm (but not violent criminality), and 3987 with dual-harm history. Each case was matched by date of birth and gender to 20 controls who had not engaged in either behavior. We estimated exposure prevalence for cases versus controls for each of the three behavior groups, and incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Experiencing five or more childhood adversities was more prevalent among individuals with dual-harm history (19.3%; 95% CI 18.0, 20.8%) versus self-harm (10.9%; 10.5, 11.3%) and violence (11.4%; 11.0%, 11.8%) histories. The highest IRRs for dual harm were linked with parental unemployment (5.15; 95% CI 4.71, 5.64), parental hospitalization following self-harm (4.91; 4.40, 5.48) or assault (5.90; 5.07, 6.86), and parental violent criminality (6.11; 5.57, 6.70). Growing up in environments that are characterized by poverty, violence, and substance misuse, and experiencing multiple adversities in childhood, appear to be especially strongly linked with elevated dual-harm risk. These novel findings indicate potential etiologic pathways to dual harm.
“双重伤害”(即同一个体同时出现自我伤害和外化暴力行为)的病因研究不足。风险因素大多是针对每种行为分别进行调查的。我们旨在研究有自我伤害和暴力犯罪史的青少年和青年在15岁之前所经历的逆境,特别关注双重伤害情况。利用丹麦全国相互关联的登记册开展了三项嵌套病例对照研究;共识别出58409例年龄在15至35岁之间的病例:28956例有暴力犯罪史(但无自我伤害史),25826例有自我伤害史(但无暴力犯罪史),3987例有双重伤害史。每个病例按出生日期和性别与20名未出现任何一种行为的对照进行匹配。我们估计了三个行为组中病例与对照的暴露患病率以及发病率比(IRR)。有双重伤害史的个体(19.3%;95%置信区间18.0,20.8%)比有自我伤害史(10.9%;10.5,11.3%)和暴力史(11.4%;11.0%,11.8%)的个体经历五种或更多童年逆境的情况更为普遍。双重伤害的最高发病率比与父母失业(5.15;95%置信区间4.71,5.64)、父母因自我伤害(4.91;4.40,5.48)或攻击行为(5.90;5.07,6.86)住院以及父母暴力犯罪(6.11;5.57,6.70)有关。在以贫困、暴力和药物滥用为特征的环境中成长,以及在童年经历多种逆境,似乎与双重伤害风险升高尤其密切相关。这些新发现揭示了双重伤害潜在的病因途径。