University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Assessment. 2021 Jun;28(4):1147-1158. doi: 10.1177/1073191120976860. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
The Five-Factor Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (FFOCI) is a recently developed measure of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) based on an established dimensional model of general personality, the five-factor model. The present study aimed to evaluate the construct validity of the FFOCI by examining its associations with both traditional and dimensional diagnostic models of OCPD. This study used an archival data set of mental health patients that employed a multimethod design. A total of 214 individuals (and their nominated informants) completed various personality inventories indexing the traditional and Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) diagnostic criteria for OCPD, as well as other individual AMPD personality traits deemed conceptually relevant to the FFOCI. The results were generally quite supportive of construct validity. They showed that FFOCI scale scores converged with traditional measures of OCPD and AMPD-OCPD traits and impairment in a conceptually expected manner, with a few exceptions. Overall, it was clear from these findings that the FFOCI takes a broader and more comprehensive approach to the assessment of obsessive-compulsive than traditional and AMPD operationalizations.
五因素强迫观念及强迫行为量表（FFOCI）是一种基于普遍人格的五因素模型（FFM）而开发的，用于评估强迫人格障碍（OCPD）的新方法。本研究旨在通过考察其与传统的和维度的 OCPD 诊断模型的关联，来评估 FFOCI 的建构效度。本研究使用了一个心理健康患者的档案数据集，采用了多方法设计。共有 214 名个体（及其指定的知情人）完成了各种人格量表，这些量表均记录了传统的和替代人格障碍模型（AMPD）的 OCPD 诊断标准，以及其他被认为与 FFOCI 概念上相关的个体 AMPD 人格特质。结果总体上相当支持建构效度。它们表明，FFOCI 量表得分与传统的 OCPD 以及 AMPD-OCPD 特质和损伤的测量方法以一种概念上预期的方式收敛，只有少数例外。总的来说，从这些发现中可以清楚地看出，FFOCI 与传统的和 AMPD 的操作化相比，对强迫的评估采取了更广泛和更全面的方法。
