• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创与开放腰椎融合手术1年随访时腰椎肌肉性能的比较

Comparisons of Lumbar Muscle Performance Between Minimally-Invasive and Open Lumbar Fusion Surgery at 1-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Lu Meng-Ling, Cheng Chih-Hsiu, Chen Wen-Chien, Fu Chen-Ju, Niu Chi-Chien

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung.

Bone and Joint Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taoyuan.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2022 Jul;12(6):1192-1198. doi: 10.1177/2192568220979666. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1177/2192568220979666
PMID:33334181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9210239/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

Minimally-invasive lumbar fusion surgery (MIS) is a viable alternative to conventional open surgery (COS) for spinal disorders. Although MIS seems to be associated with less para-spinal muscle trauma, the actual back muscle performance after MIS and COS remain controversial. This study investigated post-operative para-spinal muscle performance, and the correlation between muscle dysfunction and clinical outcome.

METHODS

In this prospective, non-randomized control study, 50 patients were enrolled and split into 2 groups: COS and MIS. We established a biomechanical model of the para-spinal muscle in the lumbar spine using electromyography (EMG) and specific muscle function tests. Functional outcomes were also reviewed and analyzed. All patients underwent EMG pre-operatively, and at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively. The para-spinal muscle performance was investigated by comparing the back muscle co-contraction ratio and the load transmission zone to the pre-operative data.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients in the COS group and 25 in the MIS group completed the study. Both groups showed a significant improved functional score. The abdominal and back muscle strengths were decreased post-operatively, and were then increased at 12 months post-operatively in both groups. During the perturbed balance task and static task, the MIS group exhibited a trend of recovery in comparison with the COS group. But, the back muscle performance at 12 months was poorer than the pre-op performance in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in clinical outcome and para-spinal muscle performance between groups. In both methods, the global muscle function had declined post-operatively.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性研究。

目的

对于脊柱疾病,微创腰椎融合手术(MIS)是传统开放手术(COS)的一种可行替代方案。尽管MIS似乎与椎旁肌创伤较小相关,但MIS和COS术后的实际背部肌肉功能仍存在争议。本研究调查了术后椎旁肌功能,以及肌肉功能障碍与临床结果之间的相关性。

方法

在这项前瞻性、非随机对照研究中,招募了50名患者并分为两组:COS组和MIS组。我们使用肌电图(EMG)和特定肌肉功能测试建立了腰椎椎旁肌的生物力学模型。还对功能结果进行了回顾和分析。所有患者在术前、术后3个月和1年接受EMG检查。通过将背部肌肉共同收缩率和负荷传递区域与术前数据进行比较,来研究椎旁肌功能。

结果

COS组21名患者和MIS组25名患者完成了研究。两组的功能评分均有显著改善。两组术后腹部和背部肌肉力量均下降,然后在术后12个月时增加。在平衡扰动任务和静态任务期间,与COS组相比,MIS组呈现出恢复趋势。但是,两组术后12个月时的背部肌肉功能均比术前差。

结论

两组之间的临床结果和椎旁肌功能无显著差异。两种方法中,术后整体肌肉功能均有所下降。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6de/9210239/4fe4d8384e0b/10.1177_2192568220979666-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6de/9210239/637e4245d4b4/10.1177_2192568220979666-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6de/9210239/e0c7870cc990/10.1177_2192568220979666-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6de/9210239/949b2ef752cf/10.1177_2192568220979666-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6de/9210239/4fe4d8384e0b/10.1177_2192568220979666-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6de/9210239/637e4245d4b4/10.1177_2192568220979666-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6de/9210239/e0c7870cc990/10.1177_2192568220979666-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6de/9210239/949b2ef752cf/10.1177_2192568220979666-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a6de/9210239/4fe4d8384e0b/10.1177_2192568220979666-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparisons of Lumbar Muscle Performance Between Minimally-Invasive and Open Lumbar Fusion Surgery at 1-Year Follow-Up.微创与开放腰椎融合手术1年随访时腰椎肌肉性能的比较
Global Spine J. 2022 Jul;12(6):1192-1198. doi: 10.1177/2192568220979666. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
2
Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.选择性腰椎椎间融合术后使用微创融合技术是否与更好的疗效相关?一项全国性前瞻性患者报告结局登记研究的分析。
Spine J. 2017 Jul;17(7):922-932. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
3
Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.机器人辅助微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎滑脱症。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Oct;13(7):1960-1968. doi: 10.1111/os.13044. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
4
A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?肥胖患者腰椎手术的前瞻性、多机构比较有效性研究:微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术是否能带来更好的疗效?
World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.034. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
5
Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial.经 MAST Quadrant 牵开器微创腰椎体间融合术与开放手术的前瞻性随机临床试验。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Dec;124(23):3868-74.
6
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.
7
[Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].[象限通道下微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗Ⅰ、Ⅱ度退行性腰椎滑脱症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 Mar 25;32(3):199-206. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.03.002.
8
[Two different techniques combined with MIS-TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis:a case-control study].[两种不同技术联合微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗退行性腰椎滑脱症:一项病例对照研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 May 25;35(5):409-17. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.05.002.
9
A Novel Inextensible Endoscopic Tube Versus Traditional Extensible Retractor System in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Observation Study.新型不可伸缩内镜管与传统可伸缩牵开器系统在单节段微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中的应用:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E587-E599.
10
Comparison of paraspinal muscle degeneration and decompression effect between conventional open and minimal invasive approaches for posterior lumbar spine surgery.传统开放与微创后路腰椎手术对椎旁肌退变和减压效果的比较。
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 3;10(1):14635. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71515-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical Evaluation of the Effect of MIS and COS Surgical Techniques on Patients with Spondylolisthesis using a Musculoskeletal Model.使用肌肉骨骼模型对微创和传统开放手术技术治疗腰椎滑脱症患者的效果进行生物力学评估。
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2025 Feb 1;15(1):49-66. doi: 10.31661/jbpe.v0i0.2406-1781. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Comparison of a novel hand-held retractor-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by the wiltse approach and posterior TLIF: a one-year prospective controlled study.新型手持牵开器辅助下经Wiltse 入路与后路 TLIF 治疗腰椎间融合术的比较:一项为期一年的前瞻性对照研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Feb 14;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07248-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Postural stability and trunk muscle responses to the static and perturbed balance tasks in individuals with and without symptomatic degenerative lumbar disease.有症状的退行性腰椎疾病患者与无症状者在静态和动态平衡任务中的姿势稳定性及躯干肌肉反应。
Gait Posture. 2018 Jul;64:159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
2
Clinical Correlation between Muscle Damage and Oswestry Disability Index Score after Open Lumbar Surgery: Does Open Surgery Reduces Functional Ability?腰椎开放手术后肌肉损伤与Oswestry功能障碍指数评分的临床相关性:开放手术是否会降低功能能力?
Asian Spine J. 2018 Jun;12(3):518-523. doi: 10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.518. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
3
Is a single-level measurement of paraspinal muscle fat infiltration and cross-sectional area representative of the entire lumbar spine?
对椎旁肌脂肪浸润和横截面积进行单节段测量能否代表整个腰椎?
Skeletal Radiol. 2018 Jul;47(7):939-945. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-2902-z. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
Open versus percutaneous instrumentation in thoracolumbar fractures: magnetic resonance imaging comparison of paravertebral muscles after implant removal.胸腰椎骨折的开放手术与经皮器械置入:内植物取出后椎旁肌肉的磁共振成像比较
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Aug;27(2):235-241. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.SPINE16886. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
5
Trunk Muscle Activation and Estimating Spinal Compressive Force in Rope and Harness Vertical Dance.绳索和背带垂直舞蹈中躯干肌肉激活及脊柱压缩力估计
J Dance Med Sci. 2015 Dec;19(4):163-72. doi: 10.12678/1089-313X.19.4.163.
6
Minimally invasive TLIF leads to increased muscle sparing of the multifidus muscle but not the longissimus muscle compared with conventional PLIF-a prospective randomized clinical trial.与传统后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)相比,微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)能减少多裂肌而非最长肌的肌肉损伤——一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
Spine J. 2016 Jul;16(7):811-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.460. Epub 2015 Jul 30.
7
Denervation and atrophy of paraspinal muscles after open lumbar interbody fusion is associated with clinical outcome--electromyographic and CT-volumetric investigation of 30 patients.开放性腰椎椎间融合术后椎旁肌去神经支配与萎缩及其与临床疗效的相关性——30例患者的肌电图和CT容积测量研究
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Feb;156(2):235-44. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1981-9. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
8
Effect and possible mechanism of muscle-splitting approach on multifidus muscle injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery.后路腰椎手术后肌裂入路对多裂肌损伤和萎缩的影响及可能机制。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 18;95(24):e192(1-9). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01607.
9
Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up.3至4年随访时,微创与开放入路单节段经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效
Eur Spine J. 2013 Dec;22(12):2857-63. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2853-y. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
10
Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.微创与开放经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术的比较:基于当前证据的荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Aug;22(8):1741-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2747-z. Epub 2013 Apr 10.