Suppr超能文献

两项关于实验室安全决策和实践的离散选择实验。

Two discrete choice experiments on laboratory safety decisions and practices.

机构信息

Bioanalytics Branch (BB), Health Effects Laboratory Division (HELD), National Institute for Occupational Safety Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Morgantown, WV 26508, United States.

Bioanalytics Branch (BB), Health Effects Laboratory Division (HELD), National Institute for Occupational Safety Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Morgantown, WV 26508, United States.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2020 Dec;75:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The path toward enhancing laboratory safety requires a thorough understanding of the factors that influence the safety-related decision making of laboratory personnel.

METHOD

We developed and administered a web-based survey to assess safety-related decision making of laboratory personnel of a government research organization. The survey included two brief discrete choice experiments (DCEs) that allowed for quantitative analysis of specific factors that potentially influence safety-related decisions and practices associated with two different hypothetical laboratory safety scenarios. One scenario related to reporting a laboratory spill, and the other scenario involved changing protective gloves between laboratory rooms. The survey also included several brief self-report measures of attitude, perception, and behavior related to safety practices.

RESULTS

Risk perception was the most influential factor in safety-related decision making in both scenarios. Potential negative consequences and effort associated with reporting an incident and the likelihood an incident was detected by others also affected reporting likelihood. Wearing gloves was also affected somewhat by perceived exposure risk, but not by other social or work-related factors included in the scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrated the promise of DCEs in quantifying the relative impact of several factors on safety-related choices of laboratory workers in two hypothetical but realistic scenarios. Participants were faced with hypothetical choice scenarios with realistic features instead of traditional scaling techniques that ask about attitudes and perceptions. The methods are suitable for addressing many occupational safety concerns in which workers face tradeoffs in their safety-related decisions and behavior. Practical Application: Safety-related decisions regarding laboratory practices such as incident reporting and use of PPE were influenced primarily by workers' perceptions of risk of exposure and severity of risks to health and safety. This finding suggests the importance of providing laboratory workers with adequate and effective education and training on the hazards and risks associated with their work. DCEs are a promising research method for better understanding the relative influences of various personal, social, and organizational factors that shape laboratory safety decisions and practices. The information gained from DCEs may lead to more targeted training materials and interventions.

摘要

简介

提高实验室安全水平需要深入了解影响实验室人员安全相关决策的因素。

方法

我们开发并管理了一个网络调查,以评估政府研究机构实验室人员的安全相关决策。该调查包括两个简短的离散选择实验(DCE),允许对可能影响与两个不同假设实验室安全场景相关的安全相关决策和实践的特定因素进行定量分析。一个场景与报告实验室溢出物有关,另一个场景涉及在实验室之间更换防护手套。该调查还包括一些与安全实践相关的态度、感知和行为的简短自我报告措施。

结果

风险感知是两个场景中安全相关决策的最具影响力的因素。报告事件的潜在负面后果和努力,以及事件被他人发现的可能性,也影响了报告的可能性。戴手套也受到感知暴露风险的影响,但不受场景中包含的其他社会或工作相关因素的影响。

结论

该研究表明,DCE 可以在两个假设但现实的场景中量化几个因素对实验室工人安全相关选择的相对影响,这具有一定的前景。参与者面临具有现实特征的假设选择场景,而不是传统的衡量技术,传统的衡量技术只询问态度和感知。这些方法适用于解决许多职业安全问题,在这些问题中,工人在安全相关决策和行为中面临权衡。

实际应用

关于实验室实践的安全相关决策,如事件报告和使用个人防护设备,主要受到工人对暴露风险和健康与安全风险严重程度的感知的影响。这一发现表明,为实验室工作人员提供与其工作相关的危害和风险的充分和有效的教育和培训非常重要。DCE 是一种很有前途的研究方法,可以更好地了解影响实验室安全决策和实践的各种个人、社会和组织因素的相对影响。从 DCE 中获得的信息可以为更有针对性的培训材料和干预措施提供信息。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Item-based analysis of delayed reward discounting decision making.基于项目的延迟奖励折扣决策分析。
Behav Processes. 2014 Mar;103:256-60. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
9
Motor vehicle fatalities among oil and gas extraction workers.石油和天然气开采工人的机动车事故死亡。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;51:168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.005. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验