• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行为分析师的“离散选择实验”简介。

An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts.

机构信息

Georgia Southern University, Department of Psychology, USA.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Health Effects Laboratory Division, Bioanalytics Branch, USA.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2022 May;198:104628. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104628. Epub 2022 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104628
PMID:35354088
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9885321/
Abstract

In this paper, we introduce discrete choice experiments (DCEs) and provide foundational knowledge on the topic. DCEs are one of the most popular methods within econometrics to study the distribution of choices within a population. DCEs are particularly useful when studying the effects of categorical variables on choice. Procedurally, a DCE involves recruiting a large sample of individuals exposed to a set of choice arrays. The factors that are suspected to affect choice are varied systematically across the choice arrays. Most commonly, DCE data are analyzed with a multinomial logit statistical model with a goal of determining the relative utility of each relevant factor. We also discuss DCEs in comparison with behavioral choice models, such as those based on the matching law, and we show an example of a DCE to illustrate how a DCE can be used to understand choice with behavioral, social, and organizational factors.

摘要

在本文中,我们介绍离散选择实验(DCE)并提供相关主题的基础知识。DCE 是计量经济学中研究群体内选择分布最常用的方法之一。当研究类别变量对选择的影响时,DCE 特别有用。从程序上讲,DCE 涉及招募大量接触一组选择数组的个体。在选择数组中系统地改变被怀疑影响选择的因素。通常,使用多项逻辑回归统计模型分析 DCE 数据,目的是确定每个相关因素的相对效用。我们还讨论了 DCE 与行为选择模型的比较,例如基于匹配律的模型,并展示了一个 DCE 的示例,说明如何使用 DCE 来理解行为、社会和组织因素的选择。

相似文献

1
An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts.行为分析师的“离散选择实验”简介。
Behav Processes. 2022 May;198:104628. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104628. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
2
3
Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences.比较离散选择实验和挥重法估计属性相对重要性:肺癌患者偏好的案例研究。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Feb;44(2):203-216. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231222421. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
4
Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?一举两得:如果要超越传统的单一最佳离散选择实验,我们应该使用最佳最差、最佳最佳还是排序法来进行偏好 elicitation?
Health Econ. 2022 Dec;31(12):2630-2647. doi: 10.1002/hec.4599. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.医疗保健选择是否可预测?离散选择实验设计和模型的影响。
Value Health. 2019 Sep;22(9):1050-1062. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1924. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
6
Discrete choice experiments to generate utility values for multi-attribute utility instruments: a systematic review of methods.离散选择实验生成多属性效用工具的效用值:方法的系统评价。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;21(7):983-992. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01189-6. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide.医疗保健中离散选择实验的样本量要求:实用指南。
Patient. 2015 Oct;8(5):373-84. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z.
8
Health valuation protocol for dual discrete choice experiment (dual-DCE) surveys to estimate the effects of different scenarios and attributes on main effects.用于双重离散选择实验(dual-DCE)调查的健康估值协议,以估计不同情景和属性对主要效应的影响。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 22;15(2):e091097. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091097.
9
Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.当比较表述偏好时,在医疗相关离散选择实验中考虑规模异质性的会计:系统评价。
Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):475-488. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0304-x.
10
A Comparison of Ordered Categorical versus Discrete Choices within a Stated Preference Survey of Whole-Blood Donors.全血献血者意愿调查中有序分类与离散选择的比较
Med Decis Making. 2023 Apr;43(3):362-373. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221145048. Epub 2022 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Discrete choice experiments: a primer for the communication researcher.离散选择实验:传播研究者入门指南
Front Commun (Lausanne). 2025;10. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1385422. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
2
Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analyses in Health Screening Programs for Type 2 Diabetes and Liver Disease: A Scoping Review.2型糖尿病和肝病健康筛查项目中的离散选择实验与联合分析:一项范围综述
Can Liver J. 2025 Feb 25;8(1):63-78. doi: 10.3138/canlivj-2024-0050. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Preferences for multi-cancer tests (MCTs) in primary care: discrete choice experiments of general practitioners and the general public in England.

本文引用的文献

1
Two discrete choice experiments on laboratory safety decisions and practices.两项关于实验室安全决策和实践的离散选择实验。
J Safety Res. 2020 Dec;75:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
2
Texting while driving: A discrete choice experiment.开车时发短信:一项离散选择实验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105823. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105823. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
3
Public preference for COVID-19 vaccines in China: A discrete choice experiment.公众对中国 COVID-19 疫苗的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
基层医疗中对多癌检测(MCTs)的偏好:英格兰全科医生和普通公众的离散选择实验
Br J Cancer. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03063-9.
4
Preferences for Mobile App Features to Support People Living With Chronic Heart Diseases: Discrete Choice Study.支持慢性心脏病患者的移动应用功能偏好:离散选择研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Apr 25;13:e58556. doi: 10.2196/58556.
5
Inpatient preferences among patients with multiple chronic conditions in China: A discrete choice experiment.中国多慢性病患者的住院偏好:一项离散选择实验
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 7;26(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02731-2.
6
Which factors drive the choice of the French-speaking Quebec population towards a COVID-19 vaccination programme: A discrete-choice experiment.哪些因素推动说法语的魁北克人选择接种 COVID-19 疫苗:一项离散选择实验。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13963. doi: 10.1111/hex.13963.
7
Eliciting preferences of persons with dementia and informal caregivers to support ageing in place in the Netherlands: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment.荷兰痴呆症患者和非正规照护者对支持就地养老偏好的 elicitation:一项离散选择实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 10;13(12):e075671. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075671.
Health Expect. 2020 Dec;23(6):1543-1578. doi: 10.1111/hex.13140. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
Comparison of delay discounting of different outcomes in cigarette smokers, smokeless tobacco users, e-cigarette users, and non-tobacco users.比较吸烟者、无烟烟草使用者、电子烟使用者和非烟草使用者对不同结果的延迟折扣。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2020 Sep;114(2):203-215. doi: 10.1002/jeab.623. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
5
Marginal Effects-Quantifying the Effect of Changes in Risk Factors in Logistic Regression Models.边际效应——量化逻辑回归模型中风险因素变化的影响
JAMA. 2019 Apr 2;321(13):1304-1305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.1954.
6
How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity.离散选择实验在多大程度上能够预测健康选择?系统评价和元分析的外部有效性。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Nov;19(8):1053-1066. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0954-6. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
7
Divergent Preferences for HIV Prevention: A Discrete Choice Experiment for Multipurpose HIV Prevention Products in South Africa.对 HIV 预防措施的不同偏好:南非多用途 HIV 预防产品的离散选择实验。
Med Decis Making. 2018 Jan;38(1):120-133. doi: 10.1177/0272989X17729376. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
8
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.离散选择实验分析的统计方法:药物经济学与结果研究国际协会联合分析良好研究实践特别工作组报告
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):300-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Women's and healthcare professionals' preferences for prenatal testing: a discrete choice experiment.女性和医疗保健专业人员对产前检查的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Prenat Diagn. 2015 Jun;35(6):549-57. doi: 10.1002/pd.4571. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
10
Gaining pounds by losing pounds: preferences for lifestyle interventions to reduce obesity.减重却增重:对减少肥胖的生活方式干预措施的偏好。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2015 Apr;10(2):161-82. doi: 10.1017/S1744133114000413. Epub 2014 Oct 28.