Suppr超能文献

DESH 角、胼胝体角和扣带回沟征在预测 iNPH 患者分流术后步态反应性中的作用。

Role of DESH, callosal angle and cingulate sulcus sign in prediction of gait responsiveness after shunting in iNPH patients.

机构信息

Dpt. of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Medical Faculty, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.

Dpt. of Radiology, Military University Hospital, Prague, Czechia.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Jan;83:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.11.020. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

Abstract

Primary endpoint of this single-centre, prospective consecutive cohort study was to evaluate DESH score, CA, CSS and Evans index of suspected iNPH patients against the reference standard of lumbar infusion test (LIT) and external lumbar drainage (ELD) in prediction of gait response after VP shunt implantation in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH). Patients were assigned to NPH and non-NPH groups based on LIT and ELD results. Age-matched controls were added for group comparison. 32 NPH, 46 non-NPH and 15 control subjects were enrolled in the study. There were significant differences in mean preoperative DESH scores of NPH, non-NPH and control groups (6.3 ± 2.3 ([±SD]) (range 2-10) vs 4.5 ± 2.4 (range 0-10) vs 1.0 ± 1.2 (range 0-4)). Differences in mean CA and Evans index were not significant between NPH and non-NPH groups. CSS showed 62.5% sensitivity, 60.87% specificity, 52.63% PPV and 70% NPV for differentiation of NPH and non-NPH groups. A CA of 68 degrees had 48.49% sensitivity, 76.09% specificity, 59.26% PPV 67.31% NPV and DESH score of 4 had 93.75% sensitivity, 41.30% specificity, 52.63% PPV and 90.48% NPV for differentiation between NPH and non-NPH groups. The groups of probable iNPH patients with gait impairment diagnosed by high DESH score or positive functional testing did not overlap and DESH score did not correlate with gait improvement after ELD. DESH score should not be used as a simple diagnostic or prognostic marker of iNPH and we could not confirm the benefit of measurement of callosal angle and cingulate sulcus sign.

摘要

本单中心前瞻性连续队列研究的主要终点是评估 DESH 评分、CA、CSS 和 Evans 指数在疑似 iNPH 患者中的表现,将其与腰椎输注试验 (LIT) 和外部腰椎引流 (ELD) 的参考标准进行对比,以预测特发性正常压力脑积水 (iNPH) 患者 VP 分流植入后的步态反应。根据 LIT 和 ELD 结果将患者分为 NPH 组和非 NPH 组,并为组间比较纳入年龄匹配的对照组。本研究共纳入 32 例 NPH 患者、46 例非 NPH 患者和 15 例对照组。NPH、非 NPH 和对照组的平均术前 DESH 评分有显著差异(6.3 ± 2.3(±SD)(范围 2-10)vs 4.5 ± 2.4(范围 0-10)vs 1.0 ± 1.2(范围 0-4))。NPH 和非 NPH 组间 CA 和 Evans 指数的差异无统计学意义。CSS 对 NPH 和非 NPH 组的区分具有 62.5%的敏感性、60.87%的特异性、52.63%的阳性预测值和 70%的阴性预测值。CA 为 68 度时,其对 NPH 和非 NPH 组的区分具有 48.49%的敏感性、76.09%的特异性、59.26%的阳性预测值、67.31%的阴性预测值和 DESH 评分为 4 时,其对 NPH 和非 NPH 组的区分具有 93.75%的敏感性、41.30%的特异性、52.63%的阳性预测值和 90.48%的阴性预测值。诊断为步态障碍的疑似 iNPH 患者,高 DESH 评分或功能检查阳性的组之间并未重叠,且 DESH 评分与 ELD 后步态改善无关。DESH 评分不应作为 iNPH 的简单诊断或预后标志物,我们也不能证实测量胼胝体角和扣带沟征的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验