• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Roseville Protocol for the Management of Febrile Infants 7-60 Days.

作者信息

Nguyen Tran H P, Young Beverly R, Poggel Laura E, Alabaster Amy, Greenhow Tara L

机构信息

Department of Hospital Pediatrics, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Roseville, California;

Department of Hospital Pediatrics, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Roseville, California.

出版信息

Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Dec 17. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0187.

DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2020-0187
PMID:33334815
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Roseville Protocol modifies the Rochester Protocol by adding a high-risk temperature criterion of >38.5°C for infants 7 to 28 days old and by allowing febrile infants 29 to 60 days old with abnormal urinalysis but reassuring complete blood cell counts to be discharged home on oral antibiotics without receiving a lumbar puncture (LP). In this study, we define the Roseville Protocol test characteristics to detect invasive bacterial infection (IBI) and retrospectively compare its performance to that of the Rochester, Philadelphia, and Boston protocols.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we examine all cases of fever in infants aged 7 to 60 days presenting to a large health maintenance organization from 2007 to 2016 and having requisite laboratory tests for protocol analysis. The 4 protocols were retrospectively applied to this cohort to calculate each protocol's sensitivity and specificity to detect IBI. Protocols were compared regarding recommended LPs, admissions, and parenteral antibiotics.

RESULTS

In 627 infants 7 to 28 days old, the Roseville Protocol had a sensitivity of 96.7% and a negative predictive value of 99.5%. It identified 2 IBIs missed by the Rochester Protocol but recommended an absolute increase of 19% in LPs and admissions. In 1176 infants 29 to 60 days old, the Roseville Protocol had a sensitivity of 91.4% and a negative predictive value of 99.6%. There was an absolute reduction in LPs by 18% to 44% compared to the Rochester Protocol and by 74% to 100% compared to the Philadelphia and Boston protocols. There was an absolute reduction in admissions by 18% to 44% compared to the Rochester Protocol, by 25% to 51% compared to the Philadelphia Protocol, and by 10% to 36% compared to the Boston Protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The Roseville Protocol has sensitivity and specificity comparable to that of existing protocols for IBI in febrile infants 7 to 60 days old, while allowing for fewer invasive procedures and hospitalizations in infants ≥29 days old.

摘要

相似文献

1
Roseville Protocol for the Management of Febrile Infants 7-60 Days.
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Dec 17. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0187.
2
Risk Stratification of Febrile Infants ≤60 Days Old Without Routine Lumbar Puncture.60 天以下无常规腰椎穿刺发热婴儿的危险分层。
Pediatrics. 2018 Dec;142(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1879. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
3
Boston Febrile Infant Algorithm 2.0: Improving Care of the Febrile Infant 1-2 Months of Age.《波士顿发热婴儿算法2.0:改善1至2月龄发热婴儿的护理》
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022 Oct 27;7(6):e616. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000616. eCollection 2022 Nov-Dec.
4
Febrile Infants ≤60 Days Old With Positive Urinalysis Results and Invasive Bacterial Infections.60 天以下发热婴儿,尿液分析阳性结果伴侵袭性细菌感染。
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Dec;10(12):1120-1125. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-000638.
5
Rochester Criteria and Yale Observation Scale Score to Evaluate Febrile Neonates with Invasive Bacterial Infection.罗氏标准和耶鲁观察量表评分用于评估有侵袭性细菌感染的发热新生儿。
J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug;63(2):159-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.10.003. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
Performance of the Modified Boston and Philadelphia Criteria for Invasive Bacterial Infections.改良波士顿和费城标准在侵袭性细菌感染中的表现。
Pediatrics. 2020 Apr;145(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3538. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
7
Performance of blood biomarkers to rule out invasive bacterial infection in febrile infants under 21 days old.21 天以下发热婴儿中排除侵袭性细菌感染的血液生物标志物的表现。
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Jun;104(6):547-551. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315397. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
8
Diagnosis and management of febrile infants (0-3 months).发热婴儿(0 - 3个月)的诊断与管理
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Mar(205):1-297.
9
Application of the Rochester Criteria to Identify Febrile Infants With Bacteremia and Meningitis.应用罗切斯特标准识别患有菌血症和脑膜炎的发热婴儿。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2019 Jan;35(1):22-27. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001421.
10
Reappraisal of criteria used to predict serious bacterial illness in febrile infants less than 8 weeks of age.对用于预测8周龄以下发热婴儿严重细菌感染的标准的重新评估。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;12(10):921-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping review of clinical decision aids in the assessment and management of febrile infants under 90 days of age.90日龄以下发热婴儿评估与管理中临床决策辅助工具的范围综述
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05619-3.
2
CA FIRST (California Febrile Infant Risk Stratification Tool) Algorithm Development in a Learning Health System.CA FIRST(加利福尼亚发热婴儿风险分层工具)在学习型健康系统中的算法开发。
Perm J. 2023 Sep 15;27(3):92-98. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.030. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
3
Clinical management and outcomes for febrile infants 29-60 days evaluated in community emergency departments.
在社区急诊科评估的29至60日龄发热婴儿的临床管理与结局
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Jun 17;3(3):e12754. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12754. eCollection 2022 Jun.