University of Tampere, Finland
University of Eastern Finland, Finland.
J Nurs Meas. 2021 Apr 1;29(1):66-79. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00047. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
Managers need evidence-based methods to evaluate their management skills. To further test the appreciative management scale (AMS 1.0) to create a practical instrument to be used in evaluating appreciative management.
For further testing, a new survey was conducted among social and healthcare managers ( = 734) in Finland. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to assess the scale validity and Cronbach's alpha coefficients the internal consistency.
The validated AMS 2.0 scale includes 24 items. The values measuring validity and reliability were good, with an Rool Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) of 0.072, Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values between 0.532 and 0.634, and Composite Reliability (CR) values ranging between 0.850 and 0.914. The Cronbach's alpha of the whole scale was 0.944.
AMS 2.0 is a reliable and valid means to measure appreciative management as proved by confirmatory factor analysis.
管理者需要基于证据的方法来评估他们的管理技能。为了进一步测试欣赏式管理量表（AMS 1.0），创建一个实用的工具来评估欣赏式管理。
为了进一步测试，在芬兰对社会和医疗保健经理（n=734）进行了一项新的调查。验证性因子分析（CFA）用于评估量表的有效性和克朗巴哈α系数的内部一致性。
验证后的 AMS 2.0 量表包括 24 个项目。测量有效性和可靠性的值良好，近似均方误差（RMSEA）为 0.072，平均方差提取（AVE）值在 0.532 到 0.634 之间，综合可靠性（CR）值在 0.850 到 0.914 之间。整个量表的克朗巴哈α系数为 0.944。
AMS 2.0 通过验证性因子分析证明是一种可靠和有效的衡量欣赏式管理的方法。
