Zhang Xingna, Hungerford Daniel, Green Mark, García-Fiñana Marta, Buchan Iain, Barr Benjamin
Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 4;15(1):e086802. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086802.
To evaluate the effectiveness of localised Tier 3 restrictions, implemented in England in December 2020, on reducing COVID-19 hospitalisations compared with less stringent Tier 2 measures and the variations by neighbourhood deprivation and the prevalence of Alpha (B.1.1.7) variant, the primary variant of concern then, to measure hospital services' burden and inequalities across different communities.
Observational study using a synthetic control method, comparing weekly hospitalisation rates in Tier 3 areas to a synthetic control from Tier 2 areas.
England between 4 October 2020 and 21 February 2021.
23 million people under Tier 3 restrictions, compared with a synthetic control group derived from 29 million people under Tier 2 restrictions.
Tier 3 restrictions in designated areas were implemented from 7 December 2020, imposing stricter limits on gatherings and hospitality than Tier 2, followed by a national lockdown on 6 January 2021.
Weekly COVID-19-related hospitalisations for neighbourhoods in England over 11 weeks following the interventions.
Implementing Tier 3 restrictions were associated with a 17% average reduction in hospitalisations compared with Tier 2 areas (95% CI 13% to 21%; 8158 (6286 to 9981) in total). The effects were similar across different levels of neighbourhood deprivation and prevalence of the Alpha variant.
Regionally targeted Tier 3 restrictions in England had a moderate but significant effect on reducing hospitalisations. The impact did not exacerbate socioeconomic inequalities during the pandemic. Our findings suggest that regionally targeted restrictions can be effective in managing infectious diseases.
评估2020年12月在英格兰实施的局部三级限制措施与宽松一些的二级措施相比,在减少新冠病毒住院病例方面的有效性,以及按邻里贫困程度和当时主要关注的阿尔法(B.1.1.7)变异株流行率划分的差异,以衡量不同社区医院服务的负担和不平等情况。
采用合成对照法的观察性研究,将三级地区的每周住院率与二级地区的合成对照进行比较。
2020年10月4日至2021年2月21日期间的英格兰。
2300万人处于三级限制之下,与之相比,合成对照组来自2900万人处于二级限制之下。
2020年12月7日起在指定地区实施三级限制,对聚会和餐饮服务施加比二级限制更严格的限制,随后于2021年1月6日实施全国封锁。
干预后11周内英格兰各社区与新冠病毒相关的每周住院病例数。
与二级地区相比,实施三级限制措施使住院病例平均减少了17%(95%置信区间为13%至21%;总共减少8158例(6286至9981例))。不同邻里贫困程度和阿尔法变异株流行率水平的影响相似。
英格兰针对地区实施的三级限制措施对减少住院病例有适度但显著的效果。在疫情期间,这种影响并未加剧社会经济不平等。我们的研究结果表明,针对地区的限制措施在控制传染病方面可能是有效的。