• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语义在形状知觉组织中的作用。

The role of semantics in the perceptual organization of shape.

机构信息

Justus Liebig University Giessen, Experimental Psychology, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, 35394, Gießen, Germany.

Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (CMBB), University of Marburgand Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79072-w.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-79072-w
PMID:33335146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7746709/
Abstract

Establishing correspondence between objects is fundamental for object constancy, similarity perception and identifying transformations. Previous studies measured point-to-point correspondence between objects before and after rigid and non-rigid shape transformations. However, we can also identify 'similar parts' on extremely different objects, such as butterflies and owls or lizards and whales. We measured point-to-point correspondence between such object pairs. In each trial, a dot was placed on the contour of one object, and participants had to place a dot on 'the corresponding location' of the other object. Responses show correspondence is established based on similarities between semantic parts (such as head, wings, or legs). We then measured correspondence between ambiguous objects with different labels (e.g., between 'duck' and 'rabbit' interpretations of the classic ambiguous figure). Despite identical geometries, correspondences were different across the interpretations, based on semantics (e.g., matching 'Head' to 'Head', 'Tail' to 'Tail'). We present a zero-parameter model based on labeled semantic part data (obtained from a different group of participants) that well explains our data and outperforms an alternative model based on contour curvature. This demonstrates how we establish correspondence between very different objects by evaluating similarity between semantic parts, combining perceptual organization and cognitive processes.

摘要

建立物体之间的对应关系是物体恒常性、相似性感知和识别变换的基础。以前的研究在刚体和非刚体形状变换前后测量了物体之间的点对点对应关系。然而,我们也可以在非常不同的物体之间识别“相似部分”,例如蝴蝶和猫头鹰或蜥蜴和鲸鱼。我们测量了这样的物体对之间的点对点对应关系。在每次试验中,在一个物体的轮廓上放置一个点,参与者必须在另一个物体的“对应位置”上放置一个点。响应表明,对应关系是基于语义部分(例如头、翅膀或腿)之间的相似性建立的。然后,我们测量了具有不同标签的模糊物体之间的对应关系(例如,经典模糊图形的“鸭子”和“兔子”解释之间)。尽管具有相同的几何形状,但基于语义(例如,将“头”与“头”、“尾”与“尾”相匹配),对应关系在不同的解释之间有所不同。我们提出了一个基于标记语义部分数据的零参数模型(从另一组参与者获得),该模型很好地解释了我们的数据,并优于基于轮廓曲率的替代模型。这表明我们如何通过评估语义部分之间的相似性、结合感知组织和认知过程,在非常不同的物体之间建立对应关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/147fc32af916/41598_2020_79072_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/ce922d592d5d/41598_2020_79072_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/3f2a96d4fd57/41598_2020_79072_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/a04777a65427/41598_2020_79072_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/a4e0ed2c6468/41598_2020_79072_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/552954f1a188/41598_2020_79072_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/8afcf7212a9c/41598_2020_79072_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/3bd7a2ad8a3e/41598_2020_79072_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/25fc8ef89eed/41598_2020_79072_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/93531bf7ecee/41598_2020_79072_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/e8d227420081/41598_2020_79072_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/1e59e9a0655d/41598_2020_79072_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/427d82842939/41598_2020_79072_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/147fc32af916/41598_2020_79072_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/ce922d592d5d/41598_2020_79072_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/3f2a96d4fd57/41598_2020_79072_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/a04777a65427/41598_2020_79072_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/a4e0ed2c6468/41598_2020_79072_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/552954f1a188/41598_2020_79072_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/8afcf7212a9c/41598_2020_79072_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/3bd7a2ad8a3e/41598_2020_79072_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/25fc8ef89eed/41598_2020_79072_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/93531bf7ecee/41598_2020_79072_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/e8d227420081/41598_2020_79072_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/1e59e9a0655d/41598_2020_79072_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/427d82842939/41598_2020_79072_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a8b/7746709/147fc32af916/41598_2020_79072_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of semantics in the perceptual organization of shape.语义在形状知觉组织中的作用。
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22141. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79072-w.
2
Perception of shape and space across rigid transformations.刚性变换下形状和空间的感知。
Vision Res. 2016 Sep;126:318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
3
The influence of object similarity on real object-based attention: The disassociation of perceptual and semantic similarity.客体相似性对基于真实客体的注意的影响:知觉相似性与语义相似性的分离。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Apr;205:103046. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103046. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
4
Visual perception of complex shape-transforming processes.对复杂形状变换过程的视觉感知。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Nov;90:48-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
5
Semantic category priming from the groundside of objects shown in nontarget locations and at unpredictable times.来自非目标位置且在不可预测时间呈现的物体底面的语义类别启动效应。
J Vis. 2018 Dec 3;18(13):3. doi: 10.1167/18.13.3.
6
Bricks, butter, and slices of cucumber: investigating semantic influences in amodal completion.砖块、黄油和黄瓜片:探究非模态完型中的语义影响
Perception. 2009;38(1):17-29. doi: 10.1068/p6018.
7
The Role of Shape in Semantic Memory Organization of Objects: An Experimental Study Using PI-Release.形状在物体语义记忆组织中的作用:一项使用PI-释放的实验研究。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(3):181-97. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000284. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
8
A saw is first identified as an object used on wood: ERP evidence for temporal differences between Thematic and Functional similarity relations.锯首先被识别为一种用于木材的工具:事件相关电位(ERP)证据表明主题相似性和功能相似性关系之间存在时间差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 May;71:28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.034. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
9
How voluntary spatial attention influences feature biases in object correspondence.自愿性空间注意力如何影响物体对应中的特征偏差。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):1024-1037. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01801-9.
10
Shared Latent Membership Enables Joint Shape Abstraction and Segmentation With Deformable Superquadrics.共享潜在成员关系可通过可变形超二次曲面实现联合形状抽象与分割。
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2024;33:3564-3577. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2024.3404234. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Human shape perception spontaneously discovers the biological origin of novel, but natural, stimuli.人类形状感知能自发地发现新颖但自然的刺激的生物学起源。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 May;22(226):20240931. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0931. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Homology judgements of pre-evolutionary naturalists explained by general human shape matching abilities.进化前的自然主义者的同源判断可以用人类普遍的形态匹配能力来解释。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 28;13(1):12269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39036-2.
3
Forgetting Details in Visual Long-Term Memory: Decay or Interference?

本文引用的文献

1
One-shot categorization of novel object classes in humans.人类新物体类别的一次性分类。
Vision Res. 2019 Dec;165:98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2019.09.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
2
Visual perception of shape-transforming processes: 'Shape Scission'.形状变换过程的视觉感知:“形状分裂”。
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
3
Getting "fumpered": Classifying objects by what has been done to them.被“搞砸”:根据对物体所做的事情对其进行分类。
视觉长期记忆中的细节遗忘:衰退还是干扰?
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jul 19;16:887321. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.887321. eCollection 2022.
J Vis. 2019 Apr 1;19(4):15. doi: 10.1167/19.4.15.
4
Identifying shape transformations from photographs of real objects.从真实物体的照片中识别形状变换。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 16;13(8):e0202115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202115. eCollection 2018.
5
Visual perception of shape altered by inferred causal history.形状的视觉感知因推断出的因果历史而改变。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 8;6:36245. doi: 10.1038/srep36245.
6
Visual perception of complex shape-transforming processes.对复杂形状变换过程的视觉感知。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Nov;90:48-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
7
Deep Neural Networks as a Computational Model for Human Shape Sensitivity.深度神经网络作为人类形状敏感度的计算模型
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Apr 28;12(4):e1004896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004896. eCollection 2016 Apr.
8
Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction.通过概率编程归纳实现人类水平的概念学习。
Science. 2015 Dec 11;350(6266):1332-8. doi: 10.1126/science.aab3050.
9
Perception of shape and space across rigid transformations.刚性变换下形状和空间的感知。
Vision Res. 2016 Sep;126:318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
10
Generalization of visual shapes by flexible and simple rules.通过灵活且简单的规则实现视觉形状的泛化。
Seeing Perceiving. 2012;25(3-4):237-61. doi: 10.1163/187847511X571519. Epub 2011 Jul 19.