Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 17;10(1):22178. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79252-8.
The use of intraoperative margin revision to achieve margin clearance in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer is controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the evidence of intraoperative margin revisions of the pancreatic neck and its impact on overall survival (OS). Nine studies with 4501 patients were included. Patient cohort was stratified in an R0R0-group (negative margin on frozen and permanent section), R1R0-group (revised positive margin on frozen section which turned negative on permanent section), and R1R1-group (positive margin on frozen and permanent section despite margin revision). OS was higher in the R1R0-group (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.96, P = 0.01) compared to the R1R1-group but lower compared to the R0R0-group (HR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05-1.37, P = 0.008), respectively. Subgroup analyses on the use of different margin clearance definitions confirmed an OS benefit in the R1R0-group compared to the R1R1-group (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.65-0.99, P = 0.04). In conclusion, intraoperative margin clearance of the pancreatic neck margin is associated with improved OS while residual tumor indicates aggressive tumor biology. Consensus definitions on margin terminologies, clearance, and surgical techniques are required.
在胰腺癌胰十二指肠切除术中,使用术中切缘修正来实现切缘清除存在争议。我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以总结胰腺颈部术中切缘修正及其对总生存(OS)的影响的证据。共纳入了 9 项研究,涉及 4501 名患者。根据患者队列,分为 R0R0 组(冷冻和石蜡切片均为阴性切缘)、R1R0 组(冷冻切片上的阳性切缘修正为阴性,但石蜡切片仍为阳性)和 R1R1 组(冷冻和石蜡切片上均为阳性切缘,尽管进行了切缘修正)。与 R1R1 组相比,R1R0 组的 OS 更高(HR 0.83,95%CI 0.72-0.96,P = 0.01),但与 R0R0 组相比,OS 更低(HR 1.20;95%CI 1.05-1.37,P = 0.008)。不同切缘清除定义的亚组分析证实,与 R1R1 组相比,R1R0 组的 OS 获益(HR 0.81;95%CI 0.65-0.99,P = 0.04)。总之,胰腺颈部的术中切缘清除与改善 OS 相关,而残留肿瘤提示肿瘤具有侵袭性生物学行为。需要对切缘术语、清除和手术技术达成共识定义。