Rastogi Archana, Ashwini N S, Rath Indira, Bihari Chhagan, Sasturkar Shridhar V, Pamecha Viniyendra
Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences, D-1 Vasant Kunj, Delhi, 110070, India.
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 9;408(1):390. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03124-8.
Hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeries are one of the most challenging and complex procedures. Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) diagnosis plays a pivotal role in management decisions. Comprehensive large cohort studies evaluating utility of IFS in HPB malignancies are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of frozen section analysis and to analyse discrepancies and impact of IFS on the surgical decisions.
This was a retrospective study of IFS received for the HPB specimens between years 2009 and 2021. The results were compared to the permanent sections to evaluate diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Indications, disagreements and impact on the surgical management were analysed.
A total of 1008 specimens were evaluated: bile duct margin (279; 27.7%), gallbladder (203; 20.1%), liver lesions (125 cases; 12.4%), lymph nodes (147; 14.6%), pancreatic margin (120; 11.9%) and deposits (134; 13.3%). IFS were diagnosed as negative for malignancy (805; 79.9%), positive for dysplasia (8; 0.8%), suspicious for malignancy (6; 0.6%) and positive for malignancy (189; 18.8%). The overall diagnostic accuracy was 98.4%, and the discordant rate was 1.6%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 94.7%, 99.4%, 97.5% and 98.6% respectively. The most important reason of discordant results was technical, followed by interpretational and sampling errors.
The study demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy (98.4%) of IFS in a large dataset of HPB specimens. This comprehensive analysis apprises of the indications, errors and the impact of IFS diagnosis on subsequent HPB surgical management.
肝胰胆(HPB)手术是最具挑战性和复杂性的手术之一。术中冰冻切片(IFS)诊断在管理决策中起着关键作用。目前缺乏评估IFS在HPB恶性肿瘤中效用的综合性大样本队列研究。本研究旨在评估冰冻切片分析的准确性,并分析IFS诊断结果的差异及其对手术决策的影响。
这是一项对2009年至2021年间接收的HPB标本的IFS进行的回顾性研究。将结果与永久切片进行比较,以评估诊断准确性、敏感性和特异性。分析了IFS的适应证、诊断分歧及其对手术管理的影响。
共评估了1008份标本:胆管切缘(279份;27.7%)、胆囊(203份;20.1%)、肝脏病变(125例;12.4%)、淋巴结(147份;14.6%)、胰腺切缘(120份;11.9%)和转移灶(134份;13.3%)。IFS诊断为恶性阴性(805份;79.9%)、发育异常阳性(8份;0.8%)、恶性可疑(6份;0.6%)和恶性阳性(189份;18.8%)。总体诊断准确性为98.4%,不一致率为1.6%。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为94.7%、99.4%、97.5%和98.6%。结果不一致的最重要原因是技术问题,其次是解释和采样误差。
本研究表明,在大量HPB标本数据集中,IFS具有较高的诊断准确性(98.4%)。这项综合分析揭示了IFS诊断的适应证、误差及其对后续HPB手术管理的影响。