Carmona Puerta Raimundo, Chávez González Elibet, Rabassa López-Calleja Magda Alina, Lorenzo Martínez Elizabeth, Cruz Elizundia Juan Miguel, Padrón Peña Gustavo, Rodríguez González Fernando
Department of Electrophysiology and Arrhythmology Cardiovascular Hospital "Ernesto Guevara" Santa Clara City Cuba.
Chief Professor in Cardiology Cardiovascular Hospital "Ernesto Guevara" Santa Clara City Cuba.
J Arrhythm. 2020 Oct 15;36(6):1083-1091. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12444. eCollection 2020 Dec.
P-wave dispersion (PWD) is believed to be caused by inhomogeneous atrial conduction. This statement, however, is based on limited little solid evidence. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between atrial conduction and PWD by means of invasive electrophysiological studies.
Cross-sectional study in 153 patients with accessory pathways and atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) undergoing an electrophysiological study. Different atrial conduction times were measured and correlated with PWD.
Only the interatrial (P-DCS) and left intra-atrial conduction times (ΔDCS-PCS) showed a significant correlation with PWD, but this correlation was weak. Multivariate linear regression analysis determined that both P-DCS (β = 0.242; = .008) and ΔDCS-PCS (β = 0.295; < .001) are independent predictors of PWD. Performing the multivariate analysis for arrhythmic substrates, it is observed that only ΔDCS-PCS continued to be an independent predictor of PWD. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curves showed that regardless of the types of arrhythmic substrates, PWD discriminates significantly, but moderately, to patients with P-DCS and ΔDCS-PCS ≥75 percentile.
Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times were directly and significantly correlated with PWD, but only weakly, and were independent predictors of PWD. In general, PWD correctly discriminates patients with high values in interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times, but moderately. This is maintained in cases with accessory pathways; however, in patients with AVNRT it only does so for intraleft atrial conduction times. Interatrial and intraleft atrial conduction times weakly explains PWD.
P波离散度(PWD)被认为是由心房传导不均匀所致。然而,这一说法基于的可靠证据有限。本研究旨在通过侵入性电生理研究确定心房传导与PWD之间的关系。
对153例有旁路和房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)并接受电生理研究的患者进行横断面研究。测量不同的心房传导时间,并将其与PWD进行关联分析。
仅房间传导时间(P-DCS)和左房内传导时间(ΔDCS-PCS)与PWD呈显著相关,但这种相关性较弱。多因素线性回归分析确定P-DCS(β = 0. , = 0.008)和ΔDCS-PCS(β = 0.295; < 0.001)均为PWD的独立预测因素。对心律失常基质进行多因素分析时,发现只有ΔDCS-PCS仍然是PWD的独立预测因素。对受试者工作特征曲线的分析表明,无论心律失常基质的类型如何,PWD对P-DCS和ΔDCS-PCS≥第75百分位数的患者有显著但中等程度的鉴别能力。
房间和左房内传导时间与PWD直接且显著相关,但相关性较弱,且是PWD的独立预测因素。一般来说,PWD能正确鉴别房间和左房内传导时间较长的患者,但鉴别能力中等。在有旁路的病例中这种情况持续存在;然而,在AVNRT患者中,它仅对左房内传导时间有鉴别作用。房间和左房内传导时间对PWD的解释作用较弱。