Wang Tianduanyi, Gautam Prson, Rousu Juho, Aittokallio Tero
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT), Department of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 Nov 24;18:3819-3832. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.11.001. eCollection 2020.
While high-throughput drug screening offers possibilities to profile phenotypic responses of hundreds of compounds, elucidation of the cell context-specific mechanisms of drug action requires additional analyses. To that end, we developed a computational target deconvolution pipeline that identifies the key target dependencies based on collective drug response patterns in each cell line separately. The pipeline combines quantitative drug-cell line responses with drug-target interaction networks among both intended on- and potent off-targets to identify pharmaceutically actionable and selective therapeutic targets. To demonstrate its performance, the target deconvolution pipeline was applied to 310 small molecules tested on 20 genetically and phenotypically heterogeneous triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines to identify cell line-specific target mechanisms in terms of cytotoxic and cytostatic drug target vulnerabilities. The functional essentiality of each protein target was quantified with a target addiction score (TAS), as a measure of dependency of the cell line on the therapeutic target. The target dependency profiling was shown to capture inhibitory information that is complementary to that obtained from the structure or sensitivity of the drugs. Comparison of the TAS profiles and gene essentiality scores from CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screens revealed that certain proteins with low gene essentiality showed high target addictions, suggesting that they might be functioning as protein groups, and therefore be resistant to single gene knock-out. The comparative analysis discovered protein groups of potential multi-target synthetic lethal interactions, for instance, among histone deacetylases (HDACs). Our integrated approach also recovered a number of well-established TNBC cell line-specific drivers and known TNBC therapeutic targets, such as HDACs and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). The present work provides novel insights into druggable vulnerabilities for TNBC, and opportunities to identify multi-target synthetic lethal interactions for further studies.
虽然高通量药物筛选为剖析数百种化合物的表型反应提供了可能,但阐明药物作用的细胞背景特异性机制还需要进行额外分析。为此,我们开发了一种计算性的靶点反卷积流程,该流程基于每个细胞系中药物的集体反应模式分别识别关键的靶点依赖性。该流程将定量的药物-细胞系反应与预期靶点和潜在脱靶之间的药物-靶点相互作用网络相结合,以识别具有药物可及性和选择性的治疗靶点。为了证明其性能,将靶点反卷积流程应用于在20种基因和表型异质性三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)细胞系上测试的310种小分子,以根据细胞毒性和细胞周期停滞药物靶点易损性确定细胞系特异性的靶点机制。用靶点成瘾评分(TAS)对每个蛋白质靶点的功能必要性进行量化,作为细胞系对治疗靶点依赖性的一种度量。结果表明,靶点依赖性分析所捕获的抑制信息与从药物结构或敏感性获得的信息互补。将TAS图谱与CRISPR-Cas9基因敲除筛选得到的基因必要性评分进行比较,发现某些基因必要性低的蛋白质表现出高靶点成瘾性,这表明它们可能以蛋白质组的形式发挥作用,因此对单基因敲除具有抗性。比较分析发现了潜在的多靶点合成致死相互作用的蛋白质组,例如组蛋白去乙酰化酶(HDAC)之间的相互作用。我们的综合方法还发现了一些已确立的TNBC细胞系特异性驱动因子和已知的TNBC治疗靶点,如HDAC和细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)。本研究为TNBC的可药物化脆弱性提供了新的见解,并为识别多靶点合成致死相互作用以供进一步研究提供了机会。