Allied Health Services, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Services, Birtinya, Australia.
Sunshine Coast Health Institute, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtinya, Australia.
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(13):3173-3180. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1861117. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
The aim of this study was to quantify changes in patients' activity levels, location and people present, within one acute stroke unit (ASU) and one inpatient rehabilitation unit (IRU) with respect to change in hospital design.
A prospective observational study using behavioural mapping. We observed participants from 8 am till 5 pm every 10 minutes across two days and compared participant activity (physical, social and cognitive), location and people present pre and post-transition to new units. Built design, staffing levels and models of care were contrasted.
We recruited 73 participants (63% stroke): old-ASU ( = 19); new-ASU ( = 15); old-IRU ( = 19); new-IRU ( = 20). Compared to old, new units had more single rooms, larger floor spaces and higher staffing levels. We found no significant change in participants' activity levels between the old and new ASU. Participants in the new IRU showed increased physical activity (43.4% vs. 54.4%, = 0.02) but social and cognitive activity remained similar. Participants were more alone (ASU 47.4% vs. 66.7%, = 0.01; IRU 41.7% vs. 58.3%, < 0.001), and less often with nursing staff (ASU 17.7% vs. 6.7%, = 0.04; IRU 18.8% vs. 5.7%, < 0.001) in new units.
Hospital design appears to impact on patients' physical activity. Single rooms may increase isolation and reduce interaction with nursing staff.Implications for rehabilitationDesign of new rehabilitation units needs to consider patients' social engagement with family, friends, other patients and staff in addition to privacy and infection control.A change in built design of rehabilitation units should prompt observation of patients' activity levels and engagement with people and available space to ensure optimal use of new environments.Promotion of communal spaces and activities away from the bedroom to encourage social engagement is recommended for patients recovering in rehabilitation facilities.Less time in contact with nursing staff in rehabilitation environments with predominantly single rooms suggests a review of clinical practice and patient safety is warranted.
本研究旨在量化在医院设计改变的情况下,一个急性卒中单元(ASU)和一个住院康复单元(IRU)中患者活动水平、位置和在场人员的变化。
前瞻性观察性研究,使用行为映射。我们在两天内每 10 分钟观察一次参与者,从上午 8 点到下午 5 点,并比较参与者在过渡到新单元前后的活动(身体、社交和认知)、位置和在场人员。对比了建筑设计、人员配备水平和护理模式。
我们招募了 73 名参与者(63%为卒中患者):旧 ASU(n=19);新 ASU(n=15);旧 IRU(n=19);新 IRU(n=20)。与旧单元相比,新单元的单人房更多,楼层面积更大,人员配备水平更高。我们发现旧 ASU 和新 ASU 之间参与者的活动水平没有显著变化。新 IRU 的参与者表现出更多的身体活动(43.4%对 54.4%,=0.02),但社交和认知活动保持相似。参与者更加孤独(ASU 47.4%对 66.7%,=0.01;IRU 41.7%对 58.3%,<0.001),与护理人员在一起的时间更少(ASU 17.7%对 6.7%,=0.04;IRU 18.8%对 5.7%,<0.001)。
医院设计似乎会影响患者的身体活动。单人房可能会增加隔离感,减少与护理人员的互动。
新康复单元的设计需要考虑患者与家人、朋友、其他患者和工作人员的社会交往,以及隐私和感染控制。
康复单元建筑设计的改变应促使观察患者的活动水平和与人员及可用空间的互动,以确保新环境的最佳利用。
建议在康复设施中鼓励患者在公共空间和远离卧室的活动中进行社交,以促进社交参与。
在主要为单人房的康复环境中,与护理人员接触的时间减少,这表明有必要审查临床实践和患者安全。