Lisanti Maria Tiziana, Blaiotta Giuseppe, Nioi Claudia, Moio Luigi
Dipt. di Agraria -Sezione di Scienze della Vigna e del Vino, Univ. degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, viale Italia 83100 Avellino, Italy.
Unité de recherche Œnologie EA 4577, USC 1366 INRA, Bordeaux INP, Inst. des Sciences de la Vigne et du Vin CS 50008 - 210, chemin de Leysotte - 33882 - Villenave d'Ornon cedex -France.
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019 Mar;18(2):455-479. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12422. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
The use of sulfur dioxide (SO ) as wine additive is able to ensure both antioxidant protection and microbiological stability. In spite of these undeniable advantages, in the last two decades the presence of SO in wine has raised concerns about potential adverse clinical effects in sensitive individuals. The winemaking industry has followed the general trend towards the reduction of SO concentrations in food, by expressing at the same time the need for alternative control methods allowing reduction or even elimination of SO In the light of this, research has been strongly oriented toward the study of alternatives to the use of SO in wine. Most of the studies have focused on methods able to replace the antimicrobial activity of SO . This review article gives a comprehensive overview of the current state-of-the-art about the chemical additives and the innovative physical techniques that have been proposed for this purpose. After a focus on the chemistry and properties of SO in wine as well as on wine spoilage and on the conventional methods used for the microbiological stabilization of wine, recent advances on alternative methods proposed to replace the antimicrobial activity of SO in winemaking are presented and discussed. Even though many of the alternatives to SO showed good efficacy, nowadays no other physical technique or additive can deliver the efficacy and broad spectrum of action as SO (both antioxidant and antimicrobial), therefore the alternative methods should be considered a complement to SO in low-sulfite winemaking, rather than being seen as its substitutes.
使用二氧化硫(SO₂)作为葡萄酒添加剂能够确保抗氧化保护和微生物稳定性。尽管有这些不可否认的优点,但在过去二十年里,葡萄酒中SO₂的存在引发了人们对敏感个体潜在不良临床影响的担忧。葡萄酒酿造行业顺应了食品中SO₂浓度降低的总体趋势,同时表示需要替代控制方法,以减少甚至消除SO₂。有鉴于此,研究一直强烈倾向于研究葡萄酒中SO₂使用的替代方法。大多数研究都集中在能够替代SO₂抗菌活性的方法上。这篇综述文章全面概述了目前关于为此目的提出的化学添加剂和创新物理技术的最新进展。在关注了葡萄酒中SO₂的化学性质和特性、葡萄酒变质以及用于葡萄酒微生物稳定的传统方法之后,介绍并讨论了在葡萄酒酿造中为替代SO₂抗菌活性而提出的替代方法的最新进展。尽管许多SO₂替代方法显示出良好的效果,但如今没有其他物理技术或添加剂能像SO₂那样(兼具抗氧化和抗菌作用)具有如此的功效和广泛的作用范围,因此在低亚硫酸盐葡萄酒酿造中,替代方法应被视为SO₂的补充,而不是其替代品。