Suppr超能文献

评论:关于豁免取消的警示说明。

Commentary: Cautionary Notes on Exemption Elimination.

机构信息

Canada Research Chair, Religious Diversity and Social Change, Director, Nonreligion in a Complex Future, Department of Classics and Religious Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov;16(2):21-24. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26356.

Abstract

A flourishing democracy should have a great deal of space for a wide range of beliefs and practices. The issue of vaccine hesitancy requires that we have as much data and information as possible in order to determine the precise point at which those beliefs and practices may endanger others or the population as a whole. Imposing restrictions before determining that point is about power rather than protection, and ultimately alienates portions of the population.

摘要

一个繁荣的民主社会应该为各种信仰和实践留出很大的空间。疫苗犹豫问题需要我们尽可能多地掌握数据和信息,以便确定这些信仰和实践在何时可能危及他人或整个人口。在确定这一点之前就施加限制,与其说是为了保护,不如说是为了权力,最终会使部分民众感到疏远。

相似文献

1
Commentary: Cautionary Notes on Exemption Elimination.评论:关于豁免取消的警示说明。
Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov;16(2):21-24. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26356.
7
Vaccine Hesitancy: Where We Are and Where We Are Going.疫苗犹豫:我们所处的位置与前进的方向
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1550-1562. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
8
Optimizing communication material to address vaccine hesitancy.优化宣传材料以应对疫苗犹豫问题。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2020 Feb 6;46(2-3):48-52. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v46i23a05.
9
Vaccine Hesitancy: Causes, Consequences, and a Call to Action.疫苗犹豫:原因、后果及行动呼吁
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6 Suppl 4):S391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
10
Beliefs around childhood vaccines in the United States: A systematic review.美国儿童疫苗接种相关信念:系统综述。
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 23;37(45):6793-6802. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.068. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验