• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Commentary: Cautionary Notes on Exemption Elimination.评论:关于豁免取消的警示说明。
Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov;16(2):21-24. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26356.
2
Knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of school nurses and personnel and associations with nonmedical immunization exemptions.学校护士及工作人员的知识、态度和信念以及与非医疗免疫豁免的关联。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e552-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e552.
3
Vaccine exemption requirements and parental vaccine attitudes: an online experiment.疫苗豁免要求和家长的疫苗态度:一项在线实验。
Vaccine. 2020 Mar 4;38(11):2620-2625. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.035. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
4
Characteristics of immunized and un-immunized students, including non-medical exemptions, in Ontario, Canada: 2016-2017 school year.加拿大安大略省免疫和未免疫学生(包括非医学豁免)的特征:2016-2017 学年。
Vaccine. 2019 May 21;37(23):3123-3132. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.033. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
5
Vaccine hesitancy and influenza beliefs among parents of children requiring a second dose of influenza vaccine in a season: An American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) study.儿童需要接种第二剂流感疫苗季节中父母的疫苗犹豫和流感信念:美国儿科学会(AAP)儿科在诊间研究(PROS)研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020 May 3;16(5):1070-1077. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1707006. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
6
"Everybody just wants to do what's best for their child": Understanding how pro-vaccine parents can support a culture of vaccine hesitancy.“每个人都只想为自己的孩子做最好的事情”:理解支持疫苗犹豫文化的亲疫苗接种家长的行为方式。
Vaccine. 2015 Nov 27;33(48):6703-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.090. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
7
Vaccine Hesitancy: Where We Are and Where We Are Going.疫苗犹豫:我们所处的位置与前进的方向
Clin Ther. 2017 Aug;39(8):1550-1562. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
8
Optimizing communication material to address vaccine hesitancy.优化宣传材料以应对疫苗犹豫问题。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2020 Feb 6;46(2-3):48-52. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v46i23a05.
9
Vaccine Hesitancy: Causes, Consequences, and a Call to Action.疫苗犹豫:原因、后果及行动呼吁
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Dec;49(6 Suppl 4):S391-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
10
Beliefs around childhood vaccines in the United States: A systematic review.美国儿童疫苗接种相关信念:系统综述。
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 23;37(45):6793-6802. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.08.068. Epub 2019 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Services Research and Government's Spending on Healthcare Programs: A Welcome Misalignment?卫生服务研究与政府医疗保健计划支出:一种受欢迎的错位?
Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov;16(2):6-13. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26358.

本文引用的文献

1
Eliminating Religious and Philosophical Exemptions: The Next Step in Ontario's Campaign against Vaccine Hesitancy.消除宗教和哲学豁免:安大略省对抗疫苗犹豫运动的下一步。
Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov;16(2):14-20. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26357.

评论:关于豁免取消的警示说明。

Commentary: Cautionary Notes on Exemption Elimination.

机构信息

Canada Research Chair, Religious Diversity and Social Change, Director, Nonreligion in a Complex Future, Department of Classics and Religious Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov;16(2):21-24. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26356.

DOI:10.12927/hcpol.2020.26356
PMID:33337311
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7710959/
Abstract

A flourishing democracy should have a great deal of space for a wide range of beliefs and practices. The issue of vaccine hesitancy requires that we have as much data and information as possible in order to determine the precise point at which those beliefs and practices may endanger others or the population as a whole. Imposing restrictions before determining that point is about power rather than protection, and ultimately alienates portions of the population.

摘要

一个繁荣的民主社会应该为各种信仰和实践留出很大的空间。疫苗犹豫问题需要我们尽可能多地掌握数据和信息,以便确定这些信仰和实践在何时可能危及他人或整个人口。在确定这一点之前就施加限制,与其说是为了保护,不如说是为了权力,最终会使部分民众感到疏远。