• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我效能领域的效应大小是否随时间变化?一项元分析研究。

Are effect sizes in self-efficacy field changing over time? A meta-meta analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Normal College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.

出版信息

Int J Psychol. 2021 Oct;56(5):801-811. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12736. Epub 2020 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1002/ijop.12736
PMID:33337546
Abstract

Theories relating to self-efficacy have developed rapidly since Bandura first proposed the concept in 1977. In the past two decades, psychologists have carried out numerous studies to research the cultural and psychological changes in social development. The research topic of this study is whether self-efficacy changes over time. This study uses a meta-meta analysis and includes 13 meta-analyses, including 536 effect sizes, with a total sample size of 421,880. We find that individual self-efficacy increases over time, which may be related to social development trends. However, the effects of interventions on self-efficacy remain similar (Q  = 1.807, df = 1, p > .05), and a possible explanation is that time effects of self-efficacy confuse the effects of intervention, because both in the intervention group and control group, the average of self-efficacy increases over time. And we find that a general decline in the predictive effects of self-efficacy (Q  = 5.117, df = 1, p = .024), especially the ability to predict relatively objective variables (e.g. job performance, teaching effectiveness, and transfer of training). A possible explanation is that as social development people tend to overestimate their self-efficacy. Another possible explanation is that the effect sizes in the original studies being overrated, may due to intentional selective reporting or unintentional statistical errors.

摘要

自 1977 年班杜拉首次提出自我效能感理论以来,该理论迅速发展。在过去的二十年中,心理学家们进行了大量研究,以研究社会发展中的文化和心理变化。本研究的研究课题是自我效能感是否随时间变化。本研究采用元分析方法,包括 13 项元分析,包含 536 个效应量,总样本量为 421880。我们发现个体自我效能感随时间推移而增加,这可能与社会发展趋势有关。然而,干预对自我效能感的影响仍然相似(Q=1.807,df=1,p>.05),一个可能的解释是,自我效能感的时间效应混淆了干预的效果,因为在干预组和对照组中,自我效能感的平均值随时间推移而增加。我们发现自我效能感预测效果普遍下降(Q=5.117,df=1,p=0.024),特别是对相对客观变量(如工作绩效、教学效果和培训转移)的预测。一种可能的解释是,随着社会的发展,人们往往会高估自己的自我效能感。另一种可能的解释是,原始研究中的效应量被高估了,这可能是由于有意的选择性报告或无意的统计错误。

相似文献

1
Are effect sizes in self-efficacy field changing over time? A meta-meta analysis.自我效能领域的效应大小是否随时间变化?一项元分析研究。
Int J Psychol. 2021 Oct;56(5):801-811. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12736. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
2
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.发表偏倚对生态学和进化生物学中的效应大小、统计功效和幅度(M 型)以及符号(S 型)错误有影响。
BMC Biol. 2023 Apr 3;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y.
3
Are Effect Sizes in Emotional Intelligence Field Declining? A Meta-Meta Analysis.情商领域的效应量在下降吗?一项元元分析。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 16;10:1655. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01655. eCollection 2019.
4
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
The Efficacy of Cognitive Intervention in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): a Meta-Analysis of Outcomes on Neuropsychological Measures.认知干预对轻度认知障碍(MCI)的疗效:神经心理学测量结果的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2017 Dec;27(4):440-484. doi: 10.1007/s11065-017-9363-3. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
7
Psychological interventions to improve self-management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.心理干预对改善 1 型和 2 型糖尿病自我管理的效果:系统综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(28):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24280.
8
9
Methodological and conceptual issues regarding occupational psychosocial coronary heart disease epidemiology.职业心理社会因素与冠心病流行病学的方法学和概念性问题
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):251-5. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3557. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
10
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Family function and health self-management ability among older adults from mountainous areas in China: moderated mediation model in a cross-sectional study.中国山区老年人的家庭功能与健康自我管理能力:一项横断面研究中的调节中介模型
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 5;25(1):1291. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22472-2.
2
Association between self-reported evidence-based medicine competencies and prescribing of drugs without scientific evidence against mild COVID-19 among recently graduated physicians in Peru.秘鲁近期毕业医生自我报告的循证医学能力与针对轻度新冠病毒疾病开具无科学依据药物处方之间的关联
Heliyon. 2023 Apr;9(4):e15366. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15366. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
3
Does Resilience Help in Reducing Burnout Symptoms Among Chinese Students? A Meta-Analysis.
心理韧性有助于减轻中国学生的职业倦怠症状吗?一项元分析。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 17;12:707792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707792. eCollection 2021.