Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Radiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jun 14;59(6):1295-1303. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa457.
To investigate the impact of lung window (LW) and mediastinal window (MW) settings on the clinical T classifications and prognostic prediction of patients with subsolid nodules.
Seven hundred and nineteen surgically resected subsolid nodules were reviewed, grouping into pure ground-glass nodules (n = 179) or part-solid nodules (n = 540) using LW. Interobserver agreement on nodule classifications was assessed via kappa-value, and predictive performance of the solid portion measurement in LW and MW for pathological invasiveness and malignancy were compared using receiver-operating characteristic analysis. Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors. Prognostic significance of T classifications based on LW (c[l]T) and MW (c[m]T) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method after propensity score matching. The performance of c(m)T for discrimination survival was estimated via the concordance index (C-index), net reclassification improvement and integrated-discrimination improvement.
By adopting MW, 124 part-solid nodules were reclassified as pure ground-glass nodules, and interobserver agreement improved to 0.917 (95% confidence interval 0.888-0.946). The solid portion size under MW more strongly predicted pathological invasiveness (P = 0.030), but did not better predict pathological malignancy. For remaining 416 part-solid nodules, c(l)T and c(m)T were both independent risk factors. c(m)T led to T classifications shifts in 321 nodules (14 upstaged and 307 downstaged) with no significant prognostic difference existing between the shifted c(m)T and matching c(l)T group after propensity score matching. The corrected C-index was improved to 0.695 (0.620-1.000) when adopting c(m)T with no significant difference in net reclassification improvement (P = 0.098) and integrated-discrimination improvement (P = 0.13) analysis.
As there is no significant benefit provided by MW in evaluating clinical T classification and prognosis, the current usage of LW is appropriate for assessing subsolid nodules.
探讨肺窗(LW)和纵隔窗(MW)设置对亚实性结节患者临床 T 分期和预后预测的影响。
回顾性分析 719 例手术切除的亚实性结节,使用 LW 将其分为纯磨玻璃结节(n=179)或部分实性结节(n=540)。通过kappa 值评估结节分类的观察者间一致性,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析比较 LW 和 MW 中实性部分测量对病理侵袭性和恶性的预测性能。Cox 回归用于识别预后因素。采用倾向评分匹配后,Kaplan-Meier 法评估基于 LW(c[l]T)和 MW(c[m]T)的 T 分期对生存的预后意义。通过一致性指数(C-index)、净重新分类改善和综合判别改善来评估 c(m)T 对生存的区分能力。
采用 MW 后,124 个部分实性结节被重新分类为纯磨玻璃结节,观察者间一致性提高至 0.917(95%置信区间 0.888-0.946)。MW 下的实性部分大小更能预测病理侵袭性(P=0.030),但不能更好地预测病理恶性程度。对于剩余的 416 个部分实性结节,c(l)T 和 c(m)T 均为独立危险因素。在 321 个结节中(14 个升级和 307 个降级),c(m)T 导致 T 分期改变,经倾向评分匹配后,移位的 c(m)T 与匹配的 c(l)T 组之间无显著预后差异。校正后的 C-index 提高至 0.695(0.620-1.000),当采用 c(m)T 时,净重新分类改善(P=0.098)和综合判别改善(P=0.13)分析无显著差异。
MW 在评估临床 T 分期和预后方面没有明显益处,因此目前使用 LW 评估亚实性结节是合适的。