Department of Dermatology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 3;51(3):315-320. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa222.
The clinical outcome of BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma has been improved by both molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Long-term follow-up data reveal durable clinical responses in patients receiving first-line combinations of BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors, particularly those showing a complete response. Clinical outcomes are also associated with the lactate dehydrogenase levels and the number of metastatic organs. Although brain metastasis is frequently difficult to control, systemic therapy is preferred in cases with small and asymptomatic brain metastases associated with progressive extra-cranial disease. Control of intra-cranial disease with BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors is comparable with that of immune checkpoint inhibitors, although immune checkpoint inhibitors are superior to targeted therapies with respect to survival. The BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors regimen is well-tolerated, and toxicities are usually manageable and reversible, but differ according to the specific regimen used. Guidelines in the United States, Europe, and Japan recommend targeted therapy for patients who need early tumor responses. A meta-analysis of retrospective data shows that the baseline lactate dehydrogenase level is significantly higher in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors than in those treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, suggesting that clinicians tend to use BRAF inhibitors plus MEK inhibitors for more advanced disease. Since there is insufficient efficacy and safety data on the use of targeted therapies for acral and mucosal melanoma, a retrospective analysis may be useful. The combination of molecular targeted therapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors is expected to elicit further improvement. The results of several trials using combination or sequential therapies will be available in the next few years.
BRAF 突变型晚期黑色素瘤的临床疗效已通过分子靶向治疗和免疫检查点抑制剂得到改善。长期随访数据显示,接受 BRAF 抑制剂加 MEK 抑制剂一线联合治疗的患者具有持久的临床反应,尤其是完全缓解的患者。临床结果还与乳酸脱氢酶水平和转移器官数量有关。尽管脑转移通常难以控制,但对于伴有进行性颅外疾病的小且无症状脑转移的患者,系统治疗是首选。BRAF 抑制剂加 MEK 抑制剂可控制颅内疾病,与免疫检查点抑制剂相当,尽管免疫检查点抑制剂在生存方面优于靶向治疗。BRAF 抑制剂加 MEK 抑制剂方案耐受性良好,毒性通常可管理和逆转,但根据具体方案而有所不同。美国、欧洲和日本的指南建议需要早期肿瘤反应的患者进行靶向治疗。一项回顾性数据分析显示,接受 BRAF 抑制剂加 MEK 抑制剂治疗的患者的基线乳酸脱氢酶水平明显高于接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的患者,这表明临床医生倾向于将 BRAF 抑制剂加 MEK 抑制剂用于更晚期的疾病。由于缺乏针对肢端和黏膜黑色素瘤的靶向治疗的充分疗效和安全性数据,回顾性分析可能会有所帮助。分子靶向治疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂有望进一步改善。未来几年将有几项联合或序贯治疗试验的结果。