Höhener Patrick, Imfeld Gwenaël
Aix Marseille University - CNRS, UMR 7376, Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry, Marseille, France.
Laboratory of Hydrology and Geochemistry of Strasbourg (LHyGeS), Université de Strasbourg, UMR 7517 CNRS/EOST, 1 Rue Blessig, 67084, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
Chemosphere. 2021 Mar;267:129232. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129232. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
In multi-elemental compound-specific isotope analysis the lambda (Λ) value expresses the isotope shift of one element versus the isotope shift of a second element. In dual-isotope plots, the slope of the regression lines typical reveals the footprint of the underlying isotope effects allowing to distinguish degradation pathways of an organic contaminant molecule in the environment. While different conventions and fitting procedures are used in the literature to determine Λ, it remains unclear how they affect the magnitude of Λ. Here we generate synthetic data for benzene δH and δC with two enrichment factors ε and ε using the Rayleigh equation to examine how different conventions and linear fitting procedures yield distinct Λ. Fitting an error-free data set in a graph plotting the δH versus δC overestimates Λ by 0.225%⋅ε/ε, meaning that if ε/εis larger than 22, Λ is overestimated by more than 5%. The correct fitting of Λ requires a natural logarithmic transformation of δH versus δC data. Using this transformation, the ordinary linear regression (OLR), the reduced major-axis (RMA) and the York methods find the correct Λ, even for large ε/ε. Fitting a dataset with synthetic data with typical random errors let to the same conclusion and positioned the suitability of each regression method. We conclude that fitting of non-transformed δ values should be discontinued. The validity of most previous Λ values is not compromised, although previously obtained Λ values for large ε/ε could be corrected using our error estimation to improve comparison.
在多元素化合物特异性同位素分析中,λ(Λ)值表示一种元素的同位素位移与另一种元素的同位素位移之比。在双同位素图中,回归线的斜率通常揭示了潜在同位素效应的特征,从而能够区分环境中有机污染物分子的降解途径。虽然文献中使用了不同的惯例和拟合程序来确定Λ,但尚不清楚它们如何影响Λ的大小。在此,我们使用瑞利方程生成具有两个富集因子ε和ε的苯δH和δC的合成数据,以研究不同的惯例和线性拟合程序如何产生不同的Λ。在绘制δH与δC的图中对无误差数据集进行拟合会使Λ高估0.225%·ε/ε,这意味着如果ε/ε大于22,则Λ的高估超过5%。正确拟合Λ需要对δH与δC数据进行自然对数变换。使用这种变换,普通线性回归(OLR)、主轴缩减(RMA)和约克方法即使对于较大的ε/ε也能找到正确的Λ。用具有典型随机误差的合成数据对数据集进行拟合得出了相同的结论,并确定了每种回归方法的适用性。我们得出结论,应停止对未变换的δ值进行拟合。大多数先前的Λ值的有效性并未受到影响,尽管先前获得的大ε/ε的Λ值可以使用我们的误差估计进行校正,以改进比较。