Dept. of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Dept. of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021 Jan;200:106411. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106411. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
The transsphenoidal approach presents unique challenges in young, with scanty literature. This study compares the outcome of pituitary tumors among young in our center between endoscopic(EES) and microscopic(MTS) transsphenoidal surgery, with a meta-analysis.
Patients within 20 years were studied for their surgical approach to a favorable outcome of endocrine remission (ER) (functioning) or Gross/Near-Total resection (nonfunctioning), besides the need for retreatment. Relevant studies were pooled and analyzed according to PRISMA guidelines.
Out of 64 young patients with pituitary tumors, 48 underwent transsphenoidal surgery using MTS(33) or EES(15). Of these, 21, 14, 5, and 8 had Cushing's, somatotropinomas, prolactinomas, and non-secreting tumors, respectively. Mean symptom duration was 28months, with weight gain(50 %) and visual complaints(29 %) most prevalent. Hypogonadism(21 %) was the most frequent endocrinopathy. The mean tumor volume was 3.8 cm. Over mean follow-up of 4.4years, favorable outcome was significantly higher after EES than MTS(78.6 % vs. 46.7 %)(odds ratio 4.18, p = 0.05). EES's better outcome was homogeneous across subgroups of age and tumor type, with no significant subgroup difference. Symptom duration was significantly higher among those who required retreatment(p = 0.05), while ER had a non-significant association with tumor volume(p = 0.07). Overall, 40 %, 27 %, 17 %, and 8% were on hydrocortisone, thyroxine, sex hormone, and desmopressin, respectively, at follow-up with no significant difference between EES and MTS. In pooled analysis of literature, both favorable outcome(74 % vs. 48 %,p = 0.02) and retreatment rate(8% vs. 37 %,p = 0.004) were significantly better with EES than MTS.
Among young patients with pituitary tumors, the favorable outcome and retreatment rates are better with endonasal endoscopy and associated with symptom duration and tumor volume.
经蝶窦入路在年轻人中存在独特的挑战,相关文献较少。本研究通过荟萃分析比较了我们中心内镜经蝶窦手术(EES)和显微镜经蝶窦手术(MTS)治疗垂体瘤的结果。
研究了 20 岁以下患者的手术方式,以获得内分泌缓解(ER)(功能性)或大体/近全切除(非功能性)的良好结果,并需要再次治疗。根据 PRISMA 指南对相关研究进行了汇总和分析。
在 64 例年轻的垂体瘤患者中,48 例行经蝶窦手术,其中 33 例采用 MTS,15 例采用 EES。其中,21 例、14 例、5 例和 8 例分别患有库欣病、生长激素瘤、催乳素瘤和无分泌功能肿瘤。平均症状持续时间为 28 个月,最常见的症状是体重增加(50%)和视觉障碍(29%)。性腺功能减退(21%)是最常见的内分泌疾病。肿瘤平均体积为 3.8cm。平均随访 4.4 年后,EES 的良好结局明显高于 MTS(78.6%比 46.7%)(优势比 4.18,p=0.05)。EES 的良好结果在年龄和肿瘤类型的亚组中是一致的,且无显著的亚组差异。需要再次治疗的患者症状持续时间明显较高(p=0.05),而 ER 与肿瘤体积无显著相关性(p=0.07)。总的来说,在随访时,分别有 40%、27%、17%和 8%的患者服用氢化可的松、甲状腺素、性激素和去氨加压素,EES 和 MTS 之间无显著差异。文献荟萃分析显示,EES 的良好结局(74%比 48%,p=0.02)和再次治疗率(8%比 37%,p=0.004)均明显优于 MTS。
在年轻的垂体瘤患者中,经鼻内镜手术的良好结局和再次治疗率更好,与症状持续时间和肿瘤体积相关。