• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube 作为硬膜外分娩镇痛医学信息的来源。

YouTube as a source of medical information about epidural analgesia for labor pain.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Division of Pain Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, USA.

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021 Feb;45:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.11.005
PMID:33339713
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large gaps remain in our understanding of the role of social media platforms in the dissemination of medical information. This cross-sectional study quantitatively assessed the accuracy and quality of information on YouTube regarding epidural labor analgesia.

METHODS

YouTube was searched on May 23, 2020 using keywords 'epidural,' 'epidural for labor,' 'epidural for pregnancy,' 'epidural experience,' and 'epidural risks,' and the top 50 viewed videos from each search were screened. Primary outcomes included the proportion of videos containing non-factual information, and video quality analyzed using the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) score.

RESULTS

Thirteen of 60 (21.7%) videos included non-factual information about epidural analgesia; these videos were viewed more than 16.5 million times (60% of total viewership of the videos analyzed). Mean (standard deviation) mDISCERN score for all included videos was 1.9 (1.3), which is below the threshold for high video-quality. Videos from medical sources (hospitals, medical practices, physicians, other medical professionals) had a higher mDISCERN score compared with videos by non-medical sources (P <0.001). Educational videos from professional societies of obstetrics or obstetric anesthesiology were not captured.

CONCLUSION

YouTube is an accessible platform for medical information on epidural labor analgesia, although a significant proportion of videos studied contained non-factual information and presented low video quality. Increased efforts by reputable sources including hospitals, physicians, other medical professionals, and professional societies, to disseminate accurate information, are warranted.

摘要

背景

我们对于社交媒体平台在传播医学信息方面的作用仍存在很大的理解空白。本横断面研究定量评估了关于硬膜外分娩镇痛的 YouTube 上信息的准确性和质量。

方法

于 2020 年 5 月 23 日使用关键词“硬膜外”“分娩硬膜外”“妊娠硬膜外”“硬膜外体验”和“硬膜外风险”在 YouTube 上进行搜索,并对每个搜索的前 50 个观看视频进行筛选。主要结果包括包含非事实信息的视频比例,以及使用改良 DISCERN(mDISCERN)评分分析的视频质量。

结果

在 60 个视频中,有 13 个(21.7%)视频包含硬膜外镇痛的非事实信息;这些视频的观看次数超过 1650 万次(占分析视频总观看次数的 60%)。所有纳入视频的平均(标准差)mDISCERN 得分为 1.9(1.3),低于视频质量高的阈值。与非医疗来源的视频相比,来自医疗来源(医院、医疗实践、医生、其他医疗专业人员)的视频的 mDISCERN 评分更高(P <0.001)。未捕获来自妇产科或产科麻醉专业协会的教育视频。

结论

YouTube 是一个可获取硬膜外分娩镇痛医学信息的平台,尽管研究中的很大一部分视频包含非事实信息,且呈现出低视频质量。包括医院、医生、其他医疗专业人员和专业协会在内的可靠来源应加大努力传播准确信息。

相似文献

1
YouTube as a source of medical information about epidural analgesia for labor pain.YouTube 作为硬膜外分娩镇痛医学信息的来源。
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2021 Feb;45:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
2
YouTube as a Source of Medical Information About Spinal Cord Stimulation.YouTube 作为脊髓刺激相关医学信息的来源。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Jan;24(1):156-161. doi: 10.1111/ner.13303. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
3
YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok 视频作为喉癌医学信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):1594. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19077-6.
4
YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?YouTube 上的 COVID-19 信息:信息错误大流行?
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604.
5
YouTube as a Source of Information on Epidural Steroid Injection.YouTube作为硬膜外类固醇注射信息的来源
J Pain Res. 2021 May 21;14:1353-1357. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S307506. eCollection 2021.
6
YouTube Videos as a Source of Misinformation on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.YouTube 视频作为特发性肺纤维化错误信息的来源。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 May;16(5):572-579. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-644OC.
7
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
8
The COVID-19 and chloroquine infodemic: Cross-sectional observational study of content analysis on YouTube.《COVID-19 和氯喹信息疫情:对 YouTube 内容分析的横断面观察研究》。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 28;18(9):e0286964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286964. eCollection 2023.
9
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
10
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Benchmarking AI Chatbots for Maternal Lactation Support: A Cross-Platform Evaluation of Quality, Readability, and Clinical Accuracy.用于产妇泌乳支持的人工智能聊天机器人基准测试:质量、可读性和临床准确性的跨平台评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 20;13(14):1756. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141756.
2
Evaluating AI-based breastfeeding chatbots: quality, readability, and reliability analysis.评估基于人工智能的母乳喂养聊天机器人:质量、可读性和可靠性分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 17;20(3):e0319782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319782. eCollection 2025.
3
A two-wave survey study examining the impact of different sources of pregnancy information on pregnancy-related anxiety among Swedish women.
一项双波调查研究,考察不同来源的怀孕信息对瑞典女性怀孕相关焦虑的影响。
Eur J Midwifery. 2025 Jan 17;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/197169. eCollection 2025.
4
YouTube as a source of education on tunneled catheter insertion: content and quality analysis.YouTube 作为经皮隧道导管插入术教育资源:内容和质量分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06330-0.
5
Medical Misinformation and Quality of Public Video Content on Cannabis for Chronic Pain Management: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the YouTube Platform.关于大麻用于慢性疼痛管理的医学错误信息及公共视频内容质量:YouTube平台的横断面分析
J Pain Res. 2024 Nov 6;17:3577-3586. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S479200. eCollection 2024.
6
Online Misleading Information About Women's Reproductive Health: A Narrative Review.关于女性生殖健康的网络误导性信息:一项叙述性综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09118-6. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
7
Social Media Usage for Medical Education and Smartphone Addiction Among Medical Students: National Web-Based Survey.社交媒体在医学教育中的应用与医学生的智能手机成瘾:全国性网络调查。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Oct 22;10:e55149. doi: 10.2196/55149.
8
YouTube as a source of education in perioperative anesthesia for patients and trainees: a systematic review.YouTube 作为患者和学员围手术期麻醉教育资源:系统评价。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;71(9):1238-1250. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02791-5. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
9
Epidural analgesia during labour and severe maternal morbidity: population based study.分娩时硬膜外镇痛与严重产妇发病率:基于人群的研究。
BMJ. 2024 May 22;385:e077190. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077190.
10
Misinformation Persists in Complementary Health: Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of YouTube-Based Information on the Use of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain.补充健康领域中错误信息仍然存在:评估YouTube上关于针灸治疗慢性疼痛的信息的可靠性和质量。
J Pain Res. 2024 Apr 16;17:1509-1518. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S459475. eCollection 2024.