• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。

YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sultan II. Abdülhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gaziosmanpaşa Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1111/1756-185X.14043
PMID:33355406
Abstract

AIM

The internet has gained popularity as a health information source for patients. YouTube is one of the biggest platforms used worldwide. Several studies showed that quality of the information on YouTube videos for patient information is poor. This study aimed to evaluate the content and quality of YouTube videos, as a source of patient information for fibromyalgia (FM).

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a YouTube search with the keyword "fibromyalgia" was performed, and the first 200 videos were listed according to relevancy. Advertisements, duplicate videos, videos in languages other than English, and videos without audio were excluded. Video features (number of "likes", "dislikes", views, length of video), and source of upload were recorded. DISCERN and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria were used for quality analysis. Video quality was assessed according to the source of upload and video features. The correlation analysis was performed between video features, JAMA, and DISCERN scores.

RESULTS

A total number of 102 videos were analyzed. The most common source of upload was physicians and majority of the content (55.8%) was about symptoms and treatment. Mean DISCERN and JAMA scores were 35.7 and 2.2, respectively. These scores were highest in videos uploaded by physicians (52.7 and 2.6, respectively). There is a positive correlation between the duration of the video, DISCERN, and JAMA scores.

CONCLUSION

The majority of YouTube content has poor quality. Health professionals should be aware of the importance of health-related information on YouTube and provide high-quality accurate and up-to-date content.

摘要

目的

互联网已成为患者获取健康信息的热门来源。YouTube 是全球使用最广泛的平台之一。有几项研究表明,YouTube 视频中关于患者信息的内容质量较差。本研究旨在评估 YouTube 视频作为纤维肌痛(FM)患者信息来源的内容和质量。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,使用关键字“fibromyalgia”进行了 YouTube 搜索,并根据相关性列出了前 200 个视频。排除广告、重复视频、非英语语言的视频和无音频的视频。记录视频特征(“点赞”、“不喜欢”、浏览量、视频长度)和上传来源。使用 DISCERN 和美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准进行质量分析。根据上传来源和视频特征评估视频质量。对视频特征、JAMA 和 DISCERN 评分进行相关性分析。

结果

共分析了 102 个视频。最常见的上传来源是医生,内容大部分(55.8%)是关于症状和治疗的。平均 DISCERN 和 JAMA 评分为 35.7 和 2.2。上传者为医生的视频得分最高(分别为 52.7 和 2.6)。视频时长、DISCERN 和 JAMA 评分之间存在正相关。

结论

YouTube 上的大部分内容质量较差。医疗专业人员应该意识到 YouTube 上健康相关信息的重要性,并提供高质量、准确且最新的内容。

相似文献

1
YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia.YouTube 作为纤维肌痛信息来源。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2021 Feb;24(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14043. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
2
Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.YouTube上关于膀胱输尿管反流的视频分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Dec;17(6):858.e1-858.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
3
Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.YouTube 视频作为睾丸扭转信息来源的质量评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 18;10:905609. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.905609. eCollection 2022.
4
A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.YouTube 上遗尿症视频的质量分析。
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):449.e1-449.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.014. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
5
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube.YouTube 上睾丸癌视频的质量分析。
Andrologia. 2021 Sep;53(8):e14118. doi: 10.1111/and.14118. Epub 2021 May 19.
7
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
8
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
9
YouTube videos in Japanese as a source of information on nocturnal enuresis: A content-quality and reliability analysis.YouTube 视频在日本被用作遗尿症信息来源:内容质量和可靠性分析。
Pediatr Int. 2022 Jan;64(1):e15049. doi: 10.1111/ped.15049.
10
Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of the Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Videos on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上的上眼睑双眼皮成形术视频的可靠性和质量。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):754-759. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02504-z. Epub 2021 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Cerebral Palsy.YouTube作为脑瘫患者信息的来源
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;13(13):1492. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131492.
2
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Providing Nutritional Recommendations for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.评估YouTube上为肠易激综合征提供营养建议的视频的质量和可靠性。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Aug;38(4):e70088. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70088.
3
YouTube as a source of education on piriformis injection: a content, quality, and reliability analysis.
YouTube作为梨状肌注射教育资源的内容、质量和可靠性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07154-2.
4
YouTube as a Source for Arabic-Speaking Parent Education on the Oral Hygiene of Children: A Social Media Content Analysis.YouTube作为阿拉伯语家长儿童口腔卫生教育的来源:一项社交媒体内容分析
Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jul-Aug;42(4):1469-1477. doi: 10.1111/phn.13551. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
5
Evaluating the quality of TikTok videos on coronary artery disease using various scales to examine correlations with video characteristics and high-quality content.使用各种量表评估TikTok上关于冠状动脉疾病的视频质量,以检验与视频特征和高质量内容的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93986-3.
6
Celiac Disease in Children and YouTube: Do the Videos Contain Accurate Information?儿童乳糜泻与YouTube:视频内容信息准确吗?
Turk Arch Pediatr. 2025 Jan 2;60(1):71-77. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2025.24235.
7
Comparative analysis of NAFLD-related health videos on TikTok: a cross-language study in the USA and China.TikTok上非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关健康视频的比较分析:美国和中国的跨语言研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):3375. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20851-9.
8
YouTube as a source of education on tunneled catheter insertion: content and quality analysis.YouTube 作为经皮隧道导管插入术教育资源:内容和质量分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06330-0.
9
Videos in Short-Video Sharing Platforms as Sources of Information on Colorectal Polyps: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.短视频分享平台上的视频作为结直肠息肉信息来源:横断面内容分析研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 29;26:e51655. doi: 10.2196/51655.
10
Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.评估心动过速相关在线视频的质量和可靠性:基于 YouTube 视频的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2620. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20062-2.