Suppr超能文献

重度急性细支气管炎的呼吸与药物治疗:临床指南难道不是为重症监护而制定的吗?

Respiratory and pharmacological management in severe acute bronchiolitis: Were clinical guidelines not written for critical care?

作者信息

Marcos-Morales A, García-Salido A, Leoz-Gordillo I, de Lama Caro-Patón G, Martínez de Azagra-Garde A, García-Teresa M Á, Iglesias-Bouzas M I, Nieto-Moro M, Serrano-González A, Casado-Flores J

机构信息

Pediatric Critical Care Unit, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, avenida Menéndez Pelayo 65, Madrid, Spain.

Pediatric Critical Care Unit, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, avenida Menéndez Pelayo 65, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr. 2021 Feb;28(2):150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2020.11.007. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The treatment applied for children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for severe acute bronchiolitis may differ from general recommendations. The first objective of our study was to describe the treatments offered to these children in a Spanish tertiary PICU. The second objective was to analyse the changes in management derived from the publication of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) bronchiolitis guideline in 2014.

METHODS

This was a retrospective-prospective observational study conducted during two epidemic waves (2014-2015 and 2015-2016). The AAP guidelines were distributed and taught to PICU staff between both epidemic waves.

RESULTS

A total of 138 children were enrolled (78 male). In the first period, 78 children were enrolled. The median age was 1.8 months (IQR 1.1-3.6). There were no differences between the management in the two periods, except for the use of high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT); its use increased in the second period. Overall, 83% of patients received non-invasive ventilation or HFOT. Children older than 12 months received HFOT exclusively. In comparison, continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure were used less during the period 2015-2016 (P=0.036). Regarding pharmacological therapy, 70% of patients received antibiotics, 23% steroids, 33% salbutamol, 31% adrenaline, and 7% hypertonic saline. The mortality rate was zero.

CONCLUSIONS

Our PICU did not follow the AAP recommendations. There were no differences between the two periods, except in the use of HFOT. All children older than 12 months received HFOT exclusively. The rate of using invasive mechanical ventilation was also low.

摘要

目的

因严重急性细支气管炎入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的儿童所接受的治疗可能与一般建议有所不同。我们研究的首要目标是描述在西班牙一家三级PICU中为这些儿童提供的治疗。第二个目标是分析2014年美国儿科学会(AAP)细支气管炎指南发布后管理方面的变化。

方法

这是一项在两个流行季(2014 - 2015年和2015 - 2016年)进行的回顾性 - 前瞻性观察性研究。在两个流行季之间,向PICU工作人员分发并讲解了AAP指南。

结果

共纳入138名儿童(78名男性)。在第一个时期,纳入78名儿童。中位年龄为1.8个月(四分位间距1.1 - 3.6)。除了高流量氧疗(HFOT)的使用外,两个时期的管理没有差异;其在第二个时期的使用有所增加。总体而言,83%的患者接受了无创通气或HFOT。12个月以上的儿童仅接受HFOT。相比之下,2015 - 2016年期间持续气道正压通气和双水平气道正压通气的使用较少(P = 0.036)。关于药物治疗,70%的患者接受了抗生素,23%接受了类固醇,33%接受了沙丁胺醇,31%接受了肾上腺素,7%接受了高渗盐水。死亡率为零。

结论

我们的PICU未遵循AAP的建议。除了HFOT的使用外,两个时期没有差异。所有12个月以上的儿童仅接受HFOT。有创机械通气的使用率也很低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验