Suppr超能文献

在中国伴有部分性发作或全面强直-阵挛发作患者中添加普瑞巴林的疗效、安全性和耐受性:III 期双盲和开放标签延伸研究的事后分析。

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in patients from China with focal seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Post hoc analysis of phase III double-blind and open-label extension studies.

机构信息

Institute of Neurosciences and Department of Neurology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong, China.

West China Hospital, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

CNS Neurosci Ther. 2021 Mar;27(3):330-340. doi: 10.1111/cns.13458.

Abstract

AIMS

This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety/tolerability of adjunctive perampanel in patients from China (aged ≥12 years) with focal seizures (FS), with/without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS).

METHODS

Study centers in China were identified using data from five double-blind, randomized, phase III studies of adjunctive perampanel (2-12 mg/day) and their open-label extensions (OLEx). Efficacy assessments included median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days, and 50% and 75% responder and seizure-freedom rates. Safety/tolerability assessments included monitoring of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

RESULTS

Overall, 277 patients (placebo, n = 79; perampanel, n = 198) were included in the double-blind safety analysis set. The full analysis set comprised 274 patients (FS, n = 238 [placebo, n = 60; perampanel, n = 178]; FBTCS, n = 120 [placebo, n = 31; perampanel, n = 89]; GTCS, n = 36 [placebo, n = 18; perampanel, n = 18]). Median percent reductions in seizure frequency for placebo vs perampanel were as follows: 16.6% vs 32.4% (FS; P < 0.05) and 39.1% vs 48.2% (FBTCS; not significant [NS]) at 4-12 mg/day, and 37.9% vs 82.6% (GTCS; NS) at 8 mg/day; 50% responder rates were 31.7% vs 37.4% (FS; NS), 48.4% vs 51.9% (FBTCS; NS), and 33.3% vs 61.1% (GTCS; NS), respectively. Seizure-freedom rates were 1.7% vs 9.2%, 16.1% vs 25.3%, and 16.7% vs 44.4%, respectively (all NS). Overall, 262 patients entered the OLEx (FS, n = 228; GTCS, n = 34). Perampanel was efficacious for up to four years for FS and FBTCS and up to two years for GTCS. Across the double-blind and OLEx studies, TEAEs were reported in 65.7% and 81.3% of perampanel-treated patients, respectively; the most common was dizziness. Efficacy and safety/tolerability outcomes were generally similar between Chinese and non-Chinese patients.

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive perampanel (up to 12 mg/day) may be a suitable treatment for Chinese patients with FS, with/without FBTCS, or GTCS, with similar efficacy and safety/tolerability compared to non-Chinese patients.

摘要

目的

本事后分析评估了在中国(年龄≥12 岁)局灶性发作(FS)、有/无局灶性到双侧强直阵挛发作(FBTCS)或全面强直阵挛发作(GTCS)的患者中,添加性吡仑帕奈的疗效和安全性/耐受性。

方法

使用五项添加性吡仑帕奈(2-12mg/天)双盲、随机、III 期研究及其开放标签扩展(OLEx)的数据,确定中国的研究中心。疗效评估包括每 28 天的癫痫发作频率中位数降低百分比,以及 50%和 75%的应答者和无癫痫发作率。安全性/耐受性评估包括监测治疗出现的不良事件(TEAEs)。

结果

总体而言,277 名患者(安慰剂,n=79;吡仑帕奈,n=198)被纳入双盲安全性分析集。全分析集包括 274 名患者(FS,n=238[安慰剂,n=60;吡仑帕奈,n=178];FBTCS,n=120[安慰剂,n=31;吡仑帕奈,n=89];GTCS,n=36[安慰剂,n=18;吡仑帕奈,n=18])。安慰剂与吡仑帕奈的癫痫发作频率中位数降低百分比分别为:16.6%与 32.4%(FS;P<0.05)和 39.1%与 48.2%(FBTCS;无显著差异[NS]),在 4-12mg/天,和 37.9%与 82.6%(GTCS;NS)在 8mg/天;50%的应答率分别为 31.7%与 37.4%(FS;NS)、48.4%与 51.9%(FBTCS;NS)和 33.3%与 61.1%(GTCS;NS)。无癫痫发作率分别为 1.7%与 9.2%、16.1%与 25.3%和 16.7%与 44.4%(均 NS)。总体而言,262 名患者进入 OLEx(FS,n=228;GTCS,n=34)。吡仑帕奈对 FS 和 FBTCS 的疗效最长可达四年,对 GTCS 的疗效最长可达两年。在双盲和 OLEx 研究中,分别有 65.7%和 81.3%的吡仑帕奈治疗患者报告了 TEAEs;最常见的是头晕。疗效和安全性/耐受性结果在中、非中国患者之间通常相似。

结论

添加性吡仑帕奈(最高 12mg/天)可能是中国 FS 伴/不伴 FBTCS 或 GTCS 患者的一种合适治疗方法,与非中国患者相比,具有相似的疗效和安全性/耐受性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/230b/7871786/4fdcb93dc482/CNS-27-330-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验