Suppr超能文献

选择油滴大小概率分布函数进行溢油建模并非易事。

The choice of droplet size probability distribution function for oil spill modeling is not trivial.

机构信息

University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, FL 33149, Miami, USA; Ifremer, STH, F-56100 Lorient, France.

University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, FL 33149, Miami, USA.

出版信息

Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Feb;163:111920. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111920. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Abstract

The droplet size distribution (DSD) formed by gas-saturated oil jets is one of the most important characteristics of the flow to understand and model the fate of uncontrolled deep-sea oil spills. The shape of the DSD, generally modeled as a theoretical lognormal, Rosin-Rammler or non-fundamental distribution function, defines the size and the mass volume range of the droplets. Yet, the fundamental DSD shape has received much less attention than the volume median size (d50) and range of the DSD during ten years of research following the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) blowout. To better understand the importance of the distribution function of the droplet size we compare the oil rising time, surface oil mass, and sedimented and beached masses for different DSDs derived from the DWH literature in idealized and applied conditions, while keeping d50 constant. We highlight substantial differences, showing that the probability distribution function of the DSD for far-field modeling is, regardless of the d50, consequential for oil spill response.

摘要

由饱和油射流形成的液滴尺寸分布(DSD)是理解和模拟失控深海溢油命运的最重要特征之一。DSD 的形状通常被建模为理论对数正态、罗辛-拉姆勒或非基本分布函数,定义了液滴的大小和质量体积范围。然而,在 Deepwater Horizon(DWH)井喷后的十年研究中,基本 DSD 形状受到的关注远不及 d50 和 DSD 的范围。为了更好地理解液滴尺寸分布函数的重要性,我们在理想和应用条件下,将从 DWH 文献中得出的不同 DSD 的油上升时间、表面油质量以及沉降和搁浅质量进行比较,同时保持 d50 不变。我们强调了显著的差异,表明远场模型化的 DSD 概率分布函数,无论 d50 如何,对溢油反应都具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验