Suppr超能文献

选择油滴大小概率分布函数进行溢油建模并非易事。

The choice of droplet size probability distribution function for oil spill modeling is not trivial.

机构信息

University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, FL 33149, Miami, USA; Ifremer, STH, F-56100 Lorient, France.

University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, FL 33149, Miami, USA.

出版信息

Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Feb;163:111920. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111920. Epub 2020 Dec 16.

Abstract

The droplet size distribution (DSD) formed by gas-saturated oil jets is one of the most important characteristics of the flow to understand and model the fate of uncontrolled deep-sea oil spills. The shape of the DSD, generally modeled as a theoretical lognormal, Rosin-Rammler or non-fundamental distribution function, defines the size and the mass volume range of the droplets. Yet, the fundamental DSD shape has received much less attention than the volume median size (d50) and range of the DSD during ten years of research following the Deepwater Horizon (DWH) blowout. To better understand the importance of the distribution function of the droplet size we compare the oil rising time, surface oil mass, and sedimented and beached masses for different DSDs derived from the DWH literature in idealized and applied conditions, while keeping d50 constant. We highlight substantial differences, showing that the probability distribution function of the DSD for far-field modeling is, regardless of the d50, consequential for oil spill response.

摘要

由饱和油射流形成的液滴尺寸分布(DSD)是理解和模拟失控深海溢油命运的最重要特征之一。DSD 的形状通常被建模为理论对数正态、罗辛-拉姆勒或非基本分布函数,定义了液滴的大小和质量体积范围。然而,在 Deepwater Horizon(DWH)井喷后的十年研究中,基本 DSD 形状受到的关注远不及 d50 和 DSD 的范围。为了更好地理解液滴尺寸分布函数的重要性,我们在理想和应用条件下,将从 DWH 文献中得出的不同 DSD 的油上升时间、表面油质量以及沉降和搁浅质量进行比较,同时保持 d50 不变。我们强调了显著的差异,表明远场模型化的 DSD 概率分布函数,无论 d50 如何,对溢油反应都具有重要意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验