Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Eur Urol. 2021 Mar;79(3):413-418. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.043. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
Before integrating prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) into routine care, it is important to assess if the benefits justify the differences in resource use.
To determine the cost-effectiveness of PSMA-PET/CT when compared with conventional imaging.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was developed using data from the proPSMA study. proPSMA included patients with high-risk prostate cancer assigned to conventional imaging or Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with planned health economics data collected. The cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from an Australian societal perspective.
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT compared with conventional imaging (CT and bone scan).
The primary outcome from proPSMA was diagnostic accuracy (nodal and distant metastases). This informed a decision tree analysis of the cost per accurate diagnosis.
The estimated cost per scan for PSMA PET/CT was AUD$1203, which was less than the conventional imaging cost at AUD$1412. PSMA PET/CT was thus dominant, having both better accuracy and a lower cost. This resulted in a cost of AUD$959 saved per additional accurate detection of nodal disease, and AUD$1412 saved for additional accurate detection of distant metastases. The results were most sensitive to variations in the number of men scanned for each Ga-PSMA-11 production run. Subsequent research is required to assess the long-term costs and benefits of PSMA PET/CT-directed care.
PSMA PET/CT has lower direct comparative costs and greater accuracy compared to conventional imaging for initial staging of men with high-risk prostate cancer. This provides a compelling case for adopting PSMA PET/CT into clinical practice.
The proPSMA study demonstrated that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) better detects disease that has spread beyond the prostate compared with conventional imaging. Our analysis shows that PSMA PET/CT is also less costly than conventional imaging for the detection of disease spread. This research was presented at the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Scientific Meeting in October 2020.
在将前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)纳入常规护理之前,重要的是要评估其益处是否证明资源使用的差异是合理的。
确定 PSMA-PET/CT 与常规成像相比的成本效益。
设计、设置和参与者:使用来自 proPSMA 研究的数据开发了成本效益分析。proPSMA 纳入了被分配给常规成像或 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT 的高危前列腺癌患者,并计划收集健康经济学数据。成本效益分析从澳大利亚社会角度进行。
Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT 与常规成像(CT 和骨扫描)相比。
proPSMA 的主要结果是诊断准确性(淋巴结和远处转移)。这为准确诊断的成本效益分析提供了决策树分析。
PSMA PET/CT 的估计每次扫描成本为 1203 澳元,低于常规成像的 1412 澳元。因此,PSMA PET/CT 具有优势,具有更高的准确性和更低的成本。这导致每额外准确检测到一个淋巴结疾病,可节省 959 澳元,每额外准确检测到一个远处转移,可节省 1412 澳元。结果对 Ga-PSMA-11 每次生产运行扫描的男性数量的变化最为敏感。需要进一步研究来评估 PSMA PET/CT 定向护理的长期成本和效益。
与常规成像相比,PSMA PET/CT 具有较低的直接比较成本和更高的准确性,用于初始分期高危前列腺癌男性。这为将 PSMA PET/CT 纳入临床实践提供了有力的依据。
proPSMA 研究表明,与常规成像相比,前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)更好地检测出前列腺外扩散的疾病。我们的分析表明,PSMA PET/CT 也比常规成像更具成本效益,用于检测疾病的扩散。这项研究于 2020 年 10 月在欧洲核医学科学会议上进行了介绍。