• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作场所感恩量表日语版(GAWS)的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Gratitude at Work Scale (GAWS).

作者信息

Komase Yu, Watanabe Kazuhiro, Sasaki Natsu, Kawakami Norito

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Japan.

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Chiyoda-ku, Japan.

出版信息

J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12185. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12185.

DOI:10.1002/1348-9585.12185
PMID:33342013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7750024/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Workplace gratitude is important for improving work-related outcomes and individual well-being. Although the gratitude at work scale (GAWS) was developed in the United States, it has not been corroborated in Asian countries with interdependent cultures. This study aimed to develop and validate the GAWS among Japanese workers.

METHOD

Japanese workers completed online surveys at baseline (N = 206) and 2 weeks later (N = 103). The Japanese GAWS was developed according to the international guidelines. We measured (a) trait gratitude as comparison for the criterion-related validity, (b) work-related outcomes/factors (eg, work engagement), and (c) well-being (eg, eudemonic well-being at work) as comparisons for convergent validity. Cronbach's alpha, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), and measurement errors were calculated to assess reliability; measurement validity was evaluated by correlational analyses and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

RESULTS

A total of 206 and 93 workers were included for baseline and follow-up analyses, respectively. Cronbach's alpha and ICCs of the Japanese GAWS ranged from 0.81 to 0.91. CFA showed that the 2-factor model (ie, gratitude for (a) a supportive work environment and (b) meaningful work) demonstrated a good fit (χ (34) = 67.58, CFI = 0.967, TLI = 0.956, RMSEA = 0.069, SRMR = 0.037), similar to the original version. As we had hypothesized, overall GAWS and the two domains were significantly correlated with trait gratitude, work-related outcomes/factors, and well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

The Japanese GAWS demonstrated good reliability and validity. Future research should explore mechanisms related to workplace gratitude and further intervention studies among workers.

摘要

目的

职场感恩对于改善与工作相关的成果和个人幸福感很重要。尽管工作感恩量表(GAWS)是在美国开发的,但在具有相互依存文化的亚洲国家尚未得到证实。本研究旨在开发并验证日本员工的GAWS。

方法

日本员工在基线时(N = 206)和两周后(N = 103)完成了在线调查。日本GAWS是根据国际指南开发的。我们测量了(a)特质感恩作为与标准相关效度的比较,(b)与工作相关的成果/因素(如工作投入),以及(c)幸福感(如工作中的幸福安康)作为收敛效度的比较。计算了克朗巴哈系数、组内相关系数(ICC)和测量误差以评估信度;通过相关分析和验证性因素分析(CFA)评估测量效度。

结果

分别有206名和93名员工纳入基线分析和随访分析。日本GAWS的克朗巴哈系数和ICC范围为0.81至0.91。CFA显示,两因素模型(即对(a)支持性工作环境和(b)有意义工作的感恩)显示出良好的拟合度(χ(34)= 67.58,CFI = 0.967,TLI = 0.956,RMSEA = 0.069,SRMR = 0.037),与原始版本相似。正如我们所假设的,总体GAWS及其两个维度与特质感恩、与工作相关的成果/因素和幸福感显著相关。

结论

日本GAWS显示出良好的信度和效度。未来的研究应探索与职场感恩相关的机制,并对员工进行进一步的干预研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c8/7750024/3e5c44a67682/JOH2-62-e12185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c8/7750024/3e5c44a67682/JOH2-62-e12185-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15c8/7750024/3e5c44a67682/JOH2-62-e12185-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Gratitude at Work Scale (GAWS).工作场所感恩量表日语版(GAWS)的信度和效度
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12185. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12185.
2
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Gratitude at Work Scale in Employed Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.工作感恩量表中文版在在职护士中的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Res. 2024 Aug 1;32(4):e336. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000620.
3
The Japanese Workplace PERMA-Profiler: A validation study among Japanese workers.《日本职场 PERMA-Profiler:日本工作者的验证研究》。
J Occup Health. 2018 Sep 26;60(5):383-393. doi: 10.1539/joh.2018-0050-OA. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
4
Internal consistency, convergent validity, and structural validity of the Japanese version of the Physical Activity Self-Regulation scale (PASR-12) among Japanese workers: A validation study.日本版身体活动自我调节量表(PASR - 12)在日本员工中的内部一致性、收敛效度和结构效度:一项效度验证研究。
J Occup Health. 2017 Jan 24;59(1):24-32. doi: 10.1539/joh.16-0143-OA. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
5
Translation and Validation of Iranian Version of the Gratitude at Work Scale (GAWS).工作感恩量表(GAWS)伊朗文版的翻译与验证。
J Relig Health. 2024 Oct;63(5):3778-3792. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02101-9. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
6
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Feedback Environment Scale (FES-J) for workers.《反馈环境量表(FES-J)日本版在劳动者中的信度和效度》
Ind Health. 2019 Jun 4;57(3):326-341. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2018-0019. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
7
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support.《组织支持感知调查》日译本的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2024 Jan 4;66(1). doi: 10.1093/joccuh/uiae034.
8
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers.工人心理安全感量表日语版的信度和效度。
Ind Health. 2022 Oct 1;60(5):436-446. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0130. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
9
Reliability and validity of the Vietnamese version of the 9-item Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.越南语版 9 项工作投入量表的信度和效度。
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12157. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12157.
10
Effects of a Newly Developed Gratitude Intervention Program on Work Engagement Among Japanese Workers: A Pre- and Posttest Study.一项新开发的感恩干预方案对日本员工工作投入的影响:一项前后测研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Sep;61(9):e378-e383. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001661.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation and Validation of Iranian Version of the Gratitude at Work Scale (GAWS).工作感恩量表(GAWS)伊朗文版的翻译与验证。
J Relig Health. 2024 Oct;63(5):3778-3792. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02101-9. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
2
Non-cardiac Chest Pain in Japan: Prevalence, Impact, and Consultation Behavior - A Population-based Study.日本的非心源性胸痛:患病率、影响及就诊行为——一项基于人群的研究
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Oct 30;29(4):446-454. doi: 10.5056/jnm22184.
3
Prevalence, characteristics, and psychological outcomes of workplace cyberbullying during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a cross-sectional online survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring eudemonic well-being at work: a validation study for the 24-item the University of Tokyo Occupational Mental Health (TOMH) well-being scale among Japanese workers.测量工作中的福乐幸福感:对日本工作者的 24 项东京大学职业心理健康(TOMH)幸福感量表进行验证研究。
Ind Health. 2020 Apr 2;58(2):107-131. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2019-0074. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
2
Feeling excited or taking a bath: Do distinct pathways underlie the positive affect-health link in the U.S. and Japan?感到兴奋或洗澡:美国和日本积极情绪与健康关联的背后是否存在不同的途径?
Emotion. 2020 Mar;20(2):164-178. doi: 10.1037/emo0000531. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
3
在日本 COVID-19 大流行期间,工作场所网络欺凌的流行率、特征和心理后果:一项横断面在线调查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 31;22(1):1087. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13481-6.
4
Effects of a gratitude intervention program on work engagement among Japanese workers: a protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.感恩干预方案对日本工作者工作投入的影响:一项群组随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Feb 23;9(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00541-6.
The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers: A daily investigation of proactive and reactive helping at work.
接受帮助者表示感谢的好处:工作中主动和被动帮助的日常调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Feb;104(2):197-213. doi: 10.1037/apl0000346. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
4
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.COSMIN 患者报告结局测量系统评价偏倚风险清单。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1171-1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
5
Gratitude in Organizations: A Contribution for Healthy Organizational Contexts.组织中的感恩:对健康组织环境的一种贡献。
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 17;8:2025. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02025. eCollection 2017.
6
Does gratitude enhance prosociality?: A meta-analytic review.感恩是否能增强亲社会行为?一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Jun;143(6):601-635. doi: 10.1037/bul0000103. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Determination and comparison of the smallest detectable change (SDC) and the minimal important change (MIC) of four-shoulder patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).四种肩袖患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的最小可检测变化(SDC)和最小有意义变化(MIC)的测定和比较。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2013 Nov 14;8:40. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-8-40.
8
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist.系统评价研究测量特性的方法学质量评估:COSMIN 清单的评分系统。
Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):651-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1. Epub 2011 Jul 6.
9
A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior.小恩小惠,意义重大:解释感恩表达为何能激发亲社会行为。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jun;98(6):946-55. doi: 10.1037/a0017935.
10
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.