Suppr超能文献

高危冠状动脉解剖结构稳定型缺血性心脏病患者血运重建后的长期临床结局。

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes Following Revascularization in High-Risk Coronary Anatomy Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.

机构信息

Canadian VIGOUR Center University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.

Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta GA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jan 5;10(1):e018104. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018104. Epub 2020 Dec 19.

Abstract

Background The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial failed to show a reduction in hard clinical end points with an early invasive strategy in stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). However, the influence of left main disease and high-risk coronary anatomy was left unaddressed. In a large angiographic disease-based registry, we examined the modulating effect of revascularization on long-term outcomes in anatomically high-risk SIHD. Methods and Results 9016 patients with SIHD with high-risk coronary anatomy (3 vessel disease with ≥70% stenosis in all 3 epicardial vessels or left main disease ≥50% stenosis [isolated or in combination with other disease]) were selected for study from April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2016. The primary composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) was compared between revascularization versus conservative management. A total of 5487 (61.0%) patients received revascularization with either coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=3312) or percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2175), while 3529 (39.0%) patients were managed conservatively. Selection for coronary revascularization was associated with improved all-cause death/MI as well as longer survival compared with selection for conservative management (Inverse Probability Weighted hazard ratio [IPW-HR] 0.62; 95% CI 0.58 to 0.66; <0.001; IPW-HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.53-0.61; <0.001, respectively). Similar risk reduction was noted with percutaneous coronary intervention (IPW-HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.59-0.70, <0.001) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (IPW-HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.66; <0.001). Conclusions Revascularization in patients with SIHD with high-risk coronary anatomy was associated with improved long-term outcome compared with conservative therapy. As such, coronary anatomical profile should be considered when contemplating treatment for SIHD.

摘要

背景

ISCHEMIA(国际比较医疗效果与有创治疗的研究)试验未能显示在稳定型缺血性心脏病(SIHD)中早期有创策略可降低硬性临床终点。然而,左主干病变和高危冠状动脉解剖结构的影响仍未得到解决。在一个大型基于血管造影的疾病登记处,我们研究了血运重建对解剖学高危 SIHD 长期结局的调节作用。

方法和结果

2002 年 4 月 1 日至 2016 年 3 月 31 日,从高危冠状动脉解剖结构的 SIHD 患者中选择了 9016 例患者(所有 3 个心外膜血管狭窄≥70%的 3 血管疾病或左主干病变狭窄≥50%[孤立或与其他病变联合])进行研究。比较了血运重建与保守治疗的全因死亡或心肌梗死(MI)的主要复合终点。共有 5487 例(61.0%)患者接受了血运重建,其中 3312 例行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG),2175 例行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),而 3529 例(39.0%)患者接受了保守治疗。与选择保守治疗相比,选择冠状动脉血运重建与全因死亡/MI 降低以及生存时间延长相关(逆概率加权风险比[IPW-HR]0.62;95%CI0.58 至 0.66;<0.001;IPW-HR0.57;95%CI0.53-0.61;<0.001)。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(IPW-HR0.64,95%CI0.59-0.70,<0.001)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(IPW-HR0.61;95%CI0.57-0.66;<0.001)也观察到了类似的风险降低。

结论

与保守治疗相比,高危冠状动脉解剖结构的 SIHD 患者的血运重建与长期预后改善相关。因此,在考虑 SIHD 的治疗时,应考虑冠状动脉解剖结构特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37b5/7955498/b6b161e3291e/JAH3-10-e018104-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验