Suppr超能文献

音系发展中的标记性和蕴涵关系:一项跨语言研究。

Markedness and implicational relationships in phonological development: A cross-linguistic investigation.

机构信息

Therapy, Child Development Centre of Prince George and District, Prince George, Canada, and.

Department of Linguistics, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Dec;22(6):669-682. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2020.1842906. Epub 2020 Dec 20.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The complexity approach to speech disorders, based on the theoretical notion of phonological markedness, has been gaining interest over the last decade. In a nutshell, this approach suggests that the acquisition of phonologically marked units (e.g. complex onsets) implies the acquisition of less marked ones (e.g. singleton onsets). However, because the notion of markedness is, itself, subject to controversies, we need to constrain what types of implications can be generalised among language learners, within and across languages.

METHOD

We report on longitudinal data from one phonologically-disordered and five typically-developing children documented across four different languages (English, French, German, Portuguese), using data from the PhonBank database (https://phonbank.talkbank.org). Using the Phon software program (https://www.phon.ca), we systematically analysed each longitudinal study for consonants in singleton onsets and codas as well as in onset clusters.

RESULT

The implicational relationships supported by our study involve units of similar types (e.g. relations between different segmental categories), while relationships that involve different types of units or processes cannot be generalised across learners.

CONCLUSION

A better understanding of implicational relationships makes the complexity approach more predictive of developmental patterns of phonology and related phonological disorders.

摘要

目的

基于音系标记性的理论概念,语音障碍的复杂性方法在过去十年中引起了越来越多的关注。简而言之,这种方法表明,对音系上有标记的单位(例如复杂的起音)的习得意味着对标记性较低的单位(例如单个起音)的习得。然而,由于标记性本身存在争议,我们需要限制语言学习者在语言内和语言间可以推广哪些类型的推论。

方法

我们报告了来自一个语音障碍儿童和五个正常发展儿童的纵向数据,这些数据记录在四种不同的语言中(英语、法语、德语、葡萄牙语),使用来自 PhonBank 数据库(https://phonbank.talkbank.org)的数据。我们使用 Phon 软件程序(https://www.phon.ca)系统地分析了每个纵向研究中的单元,包括单元的起始和结尾的单个辅音以及起始辅音群。

结果

我们的研究支持的蕴涵关系涉及类似类型的单位(例如不同的音段类别之间的关系),而涉及不同类型的单位或过程的关系不能在学习者之间推广。

结论

更好地理解蕴涵关系使复杂性方法更能预测语音和相关语音障碍的发展模式。

相似文献

4
Substitution Errors and the Role of Markedness in Bilingual Phonological Acquisition.双语语音习得中的替换错误与标记性作用。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Dec 11;66(12):4699-4715. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-23-00116. Epub 2023 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

2
Implicationally Related Error Patterns and the Selection of Treatment Targets.隐含相关的错误模式与治疗靶点的选择
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2001 Oct 1;32(4):257-270. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2001/023).
3
Frequency effects in phonological acquisition.语音习得中的频率效应。
J Child Lang. 2015 Mar;42(2):306-11; discussion 316-22. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000634.
5
Phonological complexity and language learnability.语音复杂性与语言可学性。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007 Feb;16(1):6-17. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/003).
7
A foot domain account of prosodically-conditioned substitutions.韵律条件性替换的足部辖域描述。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2003 Dec;17(8):645-57. doi: 10.1080/0269920031000118945.
8
9
Precursors to onset clusters in acquisition.习得过程中起始簇的前体。
J Child Lang. 2002 Aug;29(3):495-517. doi: 10.1017/s0305000902005238.
10
The articulatory basis of babbling.咿呀学语的发音基础。
J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Dec;38(6):1199-211. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3806.1199.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验