Suppr超能文献

德尔尼多停搏液在成人心脏手术中的应用:多长时间不算过长?

Use of del Nido Cardioplegia for Adult Heart Surgery: How Long Is Not Too Long?

作者信息

Guim Goh Si, Wah Hoon Cindy Goh, Lim Clara Anne, Chay-Nancy Huang Shoo, Li Ler Ashlynn Ai, Lim Qi Xuan, Jaafar Nurdiyana Binte, Lim Cheryl, Sazzad Faizus, Kofidis Theo

机构信息

Perfusion Services, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore; School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; and Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Extra Corpor Technol. 2020 Dec;52(4):272-278. doi: 10.1182/ject-2000025.

Abstract

The most apparent practical advantage of del Nido cardioplegia (DNC) is that it allows the surgeon a longer arrest period before a subsequent dose is needed, as opposed to the conventional St. Thomas' cardioplegia solution where the recommended ischemic time is ∼15-20 minutes. In this study, we explored the incidence of arrhythmia after cross-clamp removal as a surrogate for a safe myocardial ischemic time with the use of DNC in adult heart surgery. A total of 113 patients who had undergone heart valve repair and/or replacement surgery at the National University Hospital, Singapore, were investigated. This single-center retrospective study was conducted on a population where DNC had been used for myocardial protection between January 2017 and April 2019. Cardioplegia ischemic time interval groups were not significant predictors of postoperative arrhythmia, defibrillation, and intraoperative intra-aortic balloon pump usage. Crude comparison of postoperative outcomes showed no significant differences in any other postoperative variables, including mortality and total hospital stay. From the results of the present study, it appears that there is no optimal ischemic time interval for the administration of DNC within a 120-minute time period. It is likely that DNC has a redosing interval of, and may provide adequate myocardial protection, for up to 120 minutes.

摘要

与传统的圣托马斯心脏停搏液相比,德尔尼多心脏停搏液(DNC)最明显的实际优势在于,在需要再次给药之前,它能让外科医生有更长的心脏停搏时间,而传统的圣托马斯心脏停搏液推荐的缺血时间约为15 - 20分钟。在本研究中,我们探讨了在成人心脏手术中使用DNC时,移除交叉夹闭后心律失常的发生率,以此作为安全心肌缺血时间的替代指标。对新加坡国立大学医院113例接受心脏瓣膜修复和/或置换手术的患者进行了调查。这项单中心回顾性研究针对的是2017年1月至2019年4月期间使用DNC进行心肌保护的人群。心脏停搏液缺血时间间隔组并非术后心律失常、除颤及术中主动脉内球囊泵使用的显著预测因素。术后结果的粗略比较显示,在包括死亡率和总住院时间在内的任何其他术后变量方面均无显著差异。从本研究结果来看,在120分钟时间段内,似乎不存在DNC给药的最佳缺血时间间隔。DNC可能有长达120分钟的再次给药间隔时间,并且可能提供足够的心肌保护。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Academic Perfusion at Its Best and a New Tradition.最佳学术灌注与新传统。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2020 Dec;52(4):259-260. doi: 10.1182/ject-524fte.

本文引用的文献

4
Del Nido cardioplegia - what is the current evidence?德尔尼多停搏液——当前有哪些证据?
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2018 Jun;15(2):114-118. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2018.76477. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验