Palmer Rebecca
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2020 Sep;23(Suppl 2):S52-S56. doi: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_453_20. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
The use of the randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effectiveness of new interventions in aphasia has increased in recent years in response to calls for high quality evidence of the effectiveness of interventions for this population. This view-point article highlights some of the important considerations when designing a trial for an aphasia intervention, illustrated with decisions made when designing the Big CACTUS RCT for self-managed computer-based word finding therapy in aphasia. Considerations outlined include whether an RCT is needed, readiness for conducting an RCT, choice of comparators, randomisation options, blinding/masking, selection of outcome measures, pragmatic versus explanatory approaches, and fidelity measurement.
近年来,为回应获取针对失语症患者干预有效性高质量证据的呼声,采用随机对照试验(RCT)设计来评估失语症新干预措施有效性的情况有所增加。这篇观点文章强调了设计失语症干预试验时的一些重要考量因素,并以设计针对失语症自我管理的基于计算机的单词查找疗法的大型CACTUS RCT过程中所做的决策为例进行说明。所概述的考量因素包括是否需要进行RCT、开展RCT的准备情况、对照的选择、随机化选项、设盲/掩盖、结局指标的选择、务实与解释性方法以及保真度测量。