Randomised controlled trials - the gold standard for effectiveness research: Study design: randomised controlled trials.
作者信息
Hariton Eduardo, Locascio Joseph J
机构信息
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
出版信息
BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1716. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15199. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Randomised controlled trials - the gold standard for effectiveness research: Study design: randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验——有效性研究的金标准：研究设计：随机对照试验
BJOG. 2018 Dec;125(13):1716. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15199. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
2
Patient-oriented randomisation: A new trial design applied in the Neuroleptic Strategy Study.以患者为导向的随机分组：一种应用于抗精神病药物策略研究的新试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2016 Jun;13(3):251-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774516639910. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
3
Evaluating ethics consultation: randomised controlled trial is not the right tool.评估伦理咨询：随机对照试验并非合适的工具。
J Med Ethics. 2008 Aug;34(8):594-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022277.
4
What's in a gold standard? In defence of randomised controlled trials.金标准是什么？为随机对照试验辩护。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Dec;20(4):513-523. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9773-2.
5
[Real-world evidence.].[真实世界证据。]
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Dec;108(12):497-499. doi: 10.1701/2829.28579.
6
Randomised controlled trials for complex physiotherapy interventions are perfectly possible.针对复杂物理治疗干预措施的随机对照试验完全可行。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Aug;52(15):950-951. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098612. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
7
The design and assessment of prospective randomised, controlled trials in orthopaedic surgery.骨科手术中前瞻性随机对照试验的设计与评估。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Jul;89(7):858-63. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19440.
8
The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials?队列多次随机对照试验设计：一种比实用试验更有效和高效的替代方案？
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):96-102. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw050.
9
Randomized controlled trials--a gold standard?随机对照试验——黄金标准？
Clin Rehabil. 1999 Dec;13(6):453-5. doi: 10.1191/026921599671400676.
10
Notes on the use of randomised controlled trials to evaluate complex interventions: Community treatment orders as an illustrative case.关于使用随机对照试验评估复杂干预措施的说明：以社区治疗令为例
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Feb;23(1):185-192. doi: 10.1111/jep.12699. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
引用本文的文献
1
The Effectiveness of Online Exercise on Physical Activity, Motor Function, and Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在线运动对身体活动、运动功能和心理健康的有效性：系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 15;27:e64856. doi: 10.2196/64856.
2
Perspective Mapping: Tutorial for Collecting Quantifiable Qualitative Interview Data.视角映射：收集可量化定性访谈数据的教程
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e72622. doi: 10.2196/72622.
3
Optimising Exercise for Managing Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in People Diagnosed with Cancer.优化运动以管理癌症患者化疗引起的周围神经病变
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 31;17(15):2533. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152533.
4
Ten simple rules for research with humans.关于人体研究的十条简单规则。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Aug 7;21(8):e1013362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013362. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
Pre-Screening in Clinical Trials: Incentives, Behaviours, Consequences.临床试验中的预筛选：激励措施、行为及后果
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70231. doi: 10.1111/jep.70231.
6
Effectiveness of Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative on Early Initiation and Exclusive Breastfeeding Practice: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.爱婴医院倡议对早期开始母乳喂养和纯母乳喂养实践的有效性：系统评价与荟萃分析
Nutrients. 2025 Jul 10;17(14):2283. doi: 10.3390/nu17142283.
7
The impact of photovoice on mental health and stigma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.摄影倾诉对心理健康和污名化的影响：一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jul 22;5(7):e0004272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004272. eCollection 2025.
8
Insights from fifteen years of real-world development, testing and implementation of youth digital mental health interventions.来自十五年青少年数字心理健康干预措施的实际开发、测试和实施的见解。
Internet Interv. 2025 Jun 27;41:100849. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2025.100849. eCollection 2025 Sep.
9
Natural product-based inhibitors of quorum sensing: A novel approach to combat antibiotic resistance.基于天然产物的群体感应抑制剂：对抗抗生素耐药性的新方法。
Biochem Biophys Rep. 2025 Jun 24;43:102111. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.102111. eCollection 2025 Sep.
10
Theory-based chatbot for promoting colorectal cancer screening in a community setting in Hong Kong: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.基于理论的聊天机器人在香港社区环境中促进结直肠癌筛查：一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 10;15(7):e103857. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103857.
本文引用的文献
1
Prevention of postpartum haemorrhage with sublingual misoprostol or oxytocin: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.舌下含服米索前列醇或缩宫素预防产后出血：一项双盲随机对照试验。
BJOG. 2012 Jul;119(8):975-82; discussion 982-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03341.x.
2
Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important?理解对照试验。为什么随机对照试验很重要？
BMJ. 1998 Jan 17;316(7126):201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7126.201.
Zotero 插件