Monti Manuela, Vertogen Bernadette, Masini Carla, Donati Caterina, Lilli Claudia, Zingaretti Chiara, Musuraca Gerardo, De Giorgi Ugo, Cerchione Claudio, Farolfi Alberto, Cortesi Pietro, Viale Pierluigi, Martinelli Giovanni, Nanni Oriana
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirugiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 3;11:605185. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.605185. eCollection 2020.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide has led to a desperate search for effective drugs and vaccines. There are still no approved agents for disease prophylaxis. We thus decided to use a drug repositioning strategy to perform a state-of-the-art review of a promising but controversial drug, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), in an effort to provide an objective, scientific and methodologically correct overview of its potential prophylactic role. The advantage of using known drugs is that their toxicity profile is well known and there are fewer commercial interests (e.g., expired patents), thus allowing the scientific community to be freer of constraints. The main disadvantage is that the economic resources are almost always insufficient to promote large multinational clinical trials. In the present study, we reviewed the literature and available data on the prophylactic use of HCQ. We also took an in-depth look at all the published clinical data on the drug and examined ongoing clinical trials (CTs) from the most important CT repositories to identify a supporting rationale for HCQ prophylactic use. Our search revealed a substantial amount of preclinical data but a lack of clinical data, highlighting the need to further assess the translational impact of data in a clinical setting. We identified 77 CTs using a multiplicity of HCQ schedules, which clearly indicates that we are still far from reaching a standard of care. The majority of the CTs (92%) are randomized and 53% are being conducted in a phase 3 or 2/3 setting. The comparator is placebo or control in 55 (77%) of the randomized studies. Forty-eight (62%) CTs expect to enroll up to 1,000 subjects and 50 (71%) plan to recruit healthcare workers (HCW). With regard to drug schedules, 45 (58.5%) CTs have planned a loading dose, while 18 (23.4%) have not; the loading dose is 800 mg in 19 trials (42.2%), 400 mg in 19 (42.2%), 600 mg in 4 (8.9%) and 1,200 mg in 1 (2.2%). Forty trials include at least one daily schedule, while 19 have at least one weekly schedule. Forty-one (53.2%) will have a treatment duration of more than 30 days. Awaiting further developments that can only derive from the results of these prospective randomized CTs, the take-home message of our review is that a correct methodological approach is the key to understanding whether prophylactic HCQ can really represent an effective strategy in preventing COVID-19.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情在全球范围内的影响促使人们急切地寻找有效的药物和疫苗。目前仍没有获批用于疾病预防的药物。因此,我们决定采用药物重新定位策略,对一种有前景但存在争议的药物羟氯喹(HCQ)进行最新综述,以期对其潜在的预防作用提供客观、科学且方法正确的概述。使用已知药物的优势在于其毒性特征已为人熟知,且商业利益较少(例如专利过期),从而使科学界能更少地受到限制。主要缺点是经济资源几乎总是不足以推动大型跨国临床试验。在本研究中,我们回顾了关于HCQ预防性使用的文献和现有数据。我们还深入研究了该药物所有已发表的临床数据,并查阅了最重要的临床试验数据库中正在进行的临床试验(CT),以确定HCQ预防性使用的支持依据。我们的检索发现了大量临床前数据,但缺乏临床数据,这凸显了在临床环境中进一步评估数据转化影响的必要性。我们确定了77项使用多种HCQ给药方案的临床试验,这清楚表明我们距离达到标准治疗方案仍很遥远。大多数临床试验(92%)是随机的,53%处于3期或2/3期。在55项(77%)随机研究中,对照为安慰剂或对照组。48项(62%)临床试验预计招募至多1000名受试者,50项(71%)计划招募医护人员(HCW)。关于药物给药方案,45项(58.5%)临床试验计划了负荷剂量,而18项(23.4%)未计划;19项试验(42.2%)的负荷剂量为800毫克,19项(42.2%)为400毫克,4项(8.9%)为600毫克,1项(2.2%)为1200毫克。40项试验包括至少一种每日给药方案,19项有至少一种每周给药方案。41项(53.2%)试验的治疗持续时间将超过30天。在等待这些前瞻性随机临床试验结果带来的进一步进展之际,我们综述的关键信息是,正确的方法学途径是理解预防性使用HCQ是否真的能成为预防COVID-19的有效策略的关键。