Lebrun Aurore, Kean Rhonda B, Hooper D Craig
Department of Cancer Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Future Virol. 2020 Nov;15(11):755-761. doi: 10.2217/fvl-2020-0132. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
Immune memory cells residing in previously infected, nonlymphoid tissues play a role in immune surveillance. In the event that circulating antibodies fail to prevent virus spread to the tissues in a secondary infection, these memory cells provide an essential defense against tissue reinfection. CNS tissues are isolated from circulating immune cells and antibodies by the blood-brain barrier, making the presence of tissue-resident immune memory cells particularly needed to combat recurrent infection by neurotropic viruses. Wild-type and laboratory-engineered rabies viruses are neurotropic, differ in pathogenicity, and have varying effects on BBB functions. These viruses have proven invaluable tools in demonstrating the importance of tissue-resident immune memory cells in the reinfection of CNS tissues. Only Type 1 immune memory is effective at therapeutically clearing a secondary infection with wild-type rabies viruses from the CNS and does so despite the maintenance of blood-brain barrier integrity.
驻留在先前感染的非淋巴组织中的免疫记忆细胞在免疫监视中发挥作用。在二次感染中,循环抗体未能阻止病毒传播到组织的情况下,这些记忆细胞为抵御组织再次感染提供了重要防御。中枢神经系统组织通过血脑屏障与循环免疫细胞和抗体隔离,因此特别需要组织驻留免疫记忆细胞来对抗嗜神经病毒的反复感染。野生型和实验室改造的狂犬病病毒具有嗜神经性,致病性不同,对血脑屏障功能的影响也不同。这些病毒已被证明是展示组织驻留免疫记忆细胞在中枢神经系统组织再次感染中的重要性的宝贵工具。只有1型免疫记忆在治疗性清除中枢神经系统中的野生型狂犬病病毒二次感染方面有效,并且在维持血脑屏障完整性的情况下也是如此。