Clinical course and outcomes of simultaneous-versus staged-bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

BACKGROUND

Difference in the clinical course and outcomes between simultaneous- and staged-bilateral medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomies (OWHTOs) over time was unknown. The study hypothesis was that patients who underwent simultaneous-bilateral OWHTO (SMBO) have a more rapid improvement in knee function than those who underwent staged-bilateral OWHTO (STBO) due to difference in the change of lower limb alignment between SMBO and STBO.

METHODS

The records of 56 knees in 28 patients who underwent either SMBO (n = 28) or STBO (n = 28) were retrospectively analysed. The time course data of weight-bearing line percentage (%WBL), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and Knee Society Score were compared between the two procedures.

RESULTS

Hospitalisation for SMBO was longer than that for STBO by 1 week. No significant difference was observed in %WBL between the two procedures. The JLCA was significantly lower with SMBO than with the first-stage surgery of STBO (P < 0.05), but it became equivalent in both groups at the last follow-up. The knee scores in both SMBO and the first-stage surgery of STBO significantly improved in approximately 1 year. The function scores in the first-stage surgery of STBO did not significantly improve until the completion of the second-stage surgery whereas those in SMBO significantly improved 1 year after surgery and become stable. The function score 1 year after surgery was significantly higher in SMBO than in the first-stage surgery of STBO (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although both SMBO and STBO achieved the desired therapeutic results, SMBO led to earlier functional improvement and decreased JLCA compared with STBO.