Hôpital Henri Mondor, 94010, Creteil, France.
Hôpital Antoine Béclère, 92140, Clamart, France.
Int Orthop. 2020 Jan;44(1):109-117. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04385-z. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
With advances in technology and particularly locked screws, patients with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) are frequently allowed full weight bearing for a unilateral procedure. We are aware of no reports comparing the safety of a simultaneous bilateral HTO with staged bilateral HTO. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare these two strategies.
Ninety patients were treated with bilateral HTO surgery for osteoarthritis from 2009 to 2013; they had opening-wedge HTO and fixed with the same plate fixation and locked screws. A comparison of the outcomes after simultaneous bilateral HTO (35 patients) and after sequential staged bilateral HTO (55 patients) was performed. We considered four measures of medical safety: hypotension, serious intra-operative adverse event, heterologous blood transfusion, and thrombophlebitis. We considered also four measures of orthopaedic safety: infection, patient's inability to walk full weight bearing, changes in correction, and nonunion.
For the same duration of operation, the duration of anaesthesia and the time in the operating room were 35% longer for patients having a staged bilateral HTO. Blood loss was higher in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral HTO compared with those who underwent a staged bilateral HTO. For patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral HTO, thrombophlebitis frequency and length of anticoagulation were lower than the sum of each event in the staged bilateral HTO. The patients with simultaneous bilateral HTO had a longer total period of time for crutches than patients with staged bilateral HTO. Patients in the simultaneous bilateral cohort did not develop an infection within one year as patients in the planned-stage cohort. The simultaneous bilateral cohort had a lower rate of delayed union than the planned-stage cohort did.
On the basis of this analysis, simultaneous bilateral HTO is a reasonable treatment option. Individuals who undergo staged bilateral HTO face the risk of complications twice, in addition to two hospitalizations. Patients who undergo simultaneous bilateral HTO have a higher risk of blood transfusion.
随着技术的进步,特别是锁定螺钉的出现,接受胫骨高位截骨术(HTO)的患者通常可以进行单侧手术的完全负重。我们尚未发现比较同期双侧 HTO 与分期双侧 HTO 安全性的报道。本研究旨在回顾性比较这两种策略。
2009 年至 2013 年,90 例膝关节骨关节炎患者接受双侧 HTO 手术治疗;所有患者均行开放式楔形截骨术,使用相同的接骨板固定和锁定螺钉固定。比较同期双侧 HTO(35 例)和分期双侧 HTO(55 例)的治疗效果。我们考虑了 4 项医疗安全指标:低血压、严重术中不良事件、异体输血和血栓性静脉炎。我们还考虑了 4 项矫形安全指标:感染、患者无法完全负重行走、矫正变化和骨不连。
对于相同的手术时间,分期双侧 HTO 患者的麻醉时间和手术室时间延长了 35%。同期双侧 HTO 患者的失血量高于分期双侧 HTO 患者。与分期双侧 HTO 相比,同期双侧 HTO 患者的血栓性静脉炎发生率和抗凝时间均较低。同期双侧 HTO 患者的拐杖使用总时间长于分期双侧 HTO 患者。同期双侧 HTO 患者在一年内未发生感染,而计划分期 HTO 患者发生了感染。同期双侧 HTO 患者的延迟愈合率低于计划分期 HTO 患者。
基于本分析,同期双侧 HTO 是一种合理的治疗选择。分期双侧 HTO 患者除了两次住院外,还面临着两次并发症的风险。同期双侧 HTO 患者有更高的输血风险。