Suppr超能文献

哪些因素会影响水牛胚胎移植受体从受孕到产犊期间的妊娠情况及妊娠损失?

"Which Factors Affect Pregnancy Until Calving and Pregnancy Loss in Buffalo Recipients of Produced Embryos?".

作者信息

Saliba Wilson Pardini, Gimenes Lindsay Unno, Drumond Roberti Martins, Bayão Henrique Xavier Salgado, Di Palo Rossella, Gasparrini Bianca, Rubessa Marcello, Baruselli Pietro Sampaio, Sales José Nélio Souza, Bastianetto Eduardo, Leite Rômulo Cerqueira, Alvim Mucio Túlio Teixeira

机构信息

Autonomous Veterinarian, Porto Seguro, Brazil.

Departamento de Patologia, Reprodução e Saúde Única, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Vet Sci. 2020 Dec 2;7:577775. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.577775. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

embryo production and embryo transfer (ET) in buffaloes has been developed for decades. However, most studies are focused on the donor or laboratory improvements, and there is a lack of reports regarding the recipients. Therefore, our aim was to investigate factors associated to pregnancy (P/ET), pregnancy loss (PL), and calving rates in buffalo recipients. The studied factors were season, recipient parity, the synchronization protocol, the CL diameter, asynchrony between the embryo and the recipient, the day of the recipient estrous cycle, the embryo (fresh vs. vitrified), the day of embryo development, and the embryo stage. These retrospective data, from a program of produced embryos, were analyzed by logistic regression, and the odds ratio was also estimated. Two factors were related to P/ET and the calving rate: (1) progesterone associated to estradiol plus eCG protocol for fixed time ET tended to affect positively P/ET on day 30 (41.9 vs. 36.1%, respectively; = 0.07; AOR = 1.28) and P/ET on day 60 (37.8 vs. 36.1%, respectively; = 0.09; AOR = 1.08) compared to the Ovsynch protocol; and (2) the CL diameter (≥14.5 mm) at transfer increased P/ET on day 30 (47.4 vs. 32.5%; < 0.01; AOR = 1.87) and on day 60 (45.3 vs. 27.7%; < 0.01; AOR = 2.16), and also the calving rate (37.9 vs. 21.7%; < 0.01; AOR = 2.20). PL was greater when ET was done in the nonbreeding season compared to the breeding season (PL 30-60: 12.8 vs. 0.0%, = 0.01; AOR > 999.99; PL 60-calving: 26.8 vs. 3.6%, = 0.03; AOR = 9.90; and PL 30-calving: 36.2 vs. 3.6%, = 0.01; AOR = 15.30). In conclusion, the data of our study indicated that the synchronization protocol, the CL diameter, and ET during the breeding season impacted the reproductive efficiency of buffalo recipients.

摘要

水牛胚胎生产和胚胎移植(ET)技术已经发展了几十年。然而,大多数研究都集中在供体或实验室改进方面,关于受体的报道较少。因此,我们的目的是调查与水牛受体妊娠(P/ET)、妊娠丢失(PL)和产犊率相关的因素。研究的因素包括季节、受体胎次、同步化方案、黄体直径、胚胎与受体之间的不同步性、受体发情周期的天数、胚胎(新鲜胚胎与玻璃化胚胎)、胚胎发育天数以及胚胎阶段。这些来自一个胚胎生产项目的回顾性数据通过逻辑回归进行分析,并估计了优势比。有两个因素与P/ET和产犊率相关:(1)与Ovsynch方案相比,在固定时间ET时,孕酮联合雌二醇加eCG方案在第30天对P/ET有积极影响(分别为41.9%和36.1%;P = 0.07;优势比 = 1.28),在第60天对P/ET也有积极影响(分别为37.8%和36.1%;P = 0.09;优势比 = 1.08);(2)移植时黄体直径(≥14.5毫米)在第30天提高了P/ET(47.4%对32.5%;P < 0.01;优势比 = 1.87),在第60天也提高了P/ET(45.3%对27.7%;P < 0.01;优势比 = 2.16),并且提高了产犊率(37.9%对21.7%;P < 0.01;优势比 = 2.20)。与繁殖季节相比,在非繁殖季节进行ET时PL更高(第30 - 60天的PL:12.8%对0.0%,P = 0.01;优势比 > 999.99;第60天至产犊时的PL:26.8%对3.6%,P = 0.03;优势比 = 9.90;第30天至产犊时的PL:36.2%对3.6%,P = 0.01;优势比 = 15.30)。总之,我们的研究数据表明同步化方案、黄体直径以及在繁殖季节进行ET会影响水牛受体的繁殖效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77f2/7738327/786976193d2a/fvets-07-577775-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验